 | Chambers W. and R., ltd - 1854
...simple denomination: reduce also the third term, if compound, to its lowest given denomination. 2. Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first. The quotient will be the answer sought, and is always of the same kind as the third term. In multiplying,... | |
 | James Gray - 1854 - 108 Seiten
...denominations, reduce them to the same, and the third to the lowest denomination mentioned in it. 4. Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first ; the quotient will be the answer in the same denomination to which the third term was reduced, and... | |
 | Roswell Chamberlain Smith - 1856 - 311 Seiten
...and second terms to the same denomination, and the third term to the lowest denomination in it, then multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first, the quotient will be the fturth term or answer, in the same denominatn n with the third term. CONTRACTIONS... | |
 | Charles Davies, William Guy Peck - 1857 - 592 Seiten
...corresponding cause or effect for the first term, and the remaining cause or effect for the second term. 2 Multiply the second and third terms' together, and divide their product by the first term ; or, multiply the third term by the ratio of the first to the second. DOUBLE RULE OF THREE. Compound... | |
 | Benjamin Greenleaf - 1857 - 444 Seiten
...the second term, and the larger for the first, when the answer should be less than the third term. Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first ; or divide the third term by the ratio of the first term to the second. NOTE 1. — When the first... | |
 | David Price - 1858 - 252 Seiten
...the rule for placing the terme— 1st ? 2d 1 What is the rule for working— 1st ? 2d ? divide the product by the first term ; the quotient will be the answer to the question, in the same denomination to which the third term was reduced. ID" Sometimes it will be best to reduce the terms before you make... | |
 | Benjamin Greenleaf - 1858 - 444 Seiten
...the second term, and the larger for the first, when the ansirer should be less than the third term. Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first ; or divide the third term by the ratio of tlie first term to the second. NOTE 1. — When the first... | |
 | Chambers W. and R., ltd - 1859
...below, can be carried on without thisreduction, according to Compound Multiplication and Division. 2. Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first. The quotient will be the answer sought, and is always of the same kind as the third term. In multiplying,... | |
 | Emerson Elbridge White - 1861 - 332 Seiten
...and second terms of each of the simple ratios of the compound ratio as in SIMPLE PKOPORTION. Then, multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the product of the first terms. The quotient will be the answer. Or, Arrange the third and second terms... | |
 | Charles Davies - 1863 - 336 Seiten
...when it is less, place the greater term there, and the remaining term in the second place. II. Then multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first. NOTES. — 1. If the first aud second terms have different units, they must be reduced to the same... | |
| |
... 3. Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first term , the quotient will be the answer to the question, in the same denomination you left the, second term in, which may be brought into anv other denomination... 
