| Chambers W. and R., ltd - 1854
...simple denomination: reduce also the third term, if compound, to its lowest given denomination. 2. **Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first.** The quotient will be the answer sought, and is always of the same kind as the third term. In multiplying,... | |
| James Gray - 1854 - 108 Seiten
...denominations, reduce them to the same, and the third to the lowest denomination mentioned in it. 4. **Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first** ; the quotient will be the answer in the same denomination to which the third term was reduced, and... | |
| Roswell Chamberlain Smith - 1856 - 311 Seiten
...and second terms to the same denomination, and the third term to the lowest denomination in it, then **multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first,** the quotient will be the fturth term or answer, in the same denominatn n with the third term. CONTRACTIONS... | |
| Charles Davies, William Guy Peck - 1857 - 592 Seiten
...corresponding cause or effect for the first term, and the remaining cause or effect for the second term. 2 **Multiply the second and third terms' together, and divide their product by the first term** ; or, multiply the third term by the ratio of the first to the second. DOUBLE RULE OF THREE. Compound... | |
| Benjamin Greenleaf - 1857 - 444 Seiten
...the second term, and the larger for the first, when the answer should be less than the third term. **Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first** ; or divide the third term by the ratio of the first term to the second. NOTE 1. — When the first... | |
| David Price - 1858 - 252 Seiten
...the rule for placing the terme— 1st ? 2d 1 What is the rule for working— 1st ? 2d ? divide the **product by the first term ; the quotient will be the answer to the question, in the same denomination** to which the third term was reduced. ID" Sometimes it will be best to reduce the terms before you make... | |
| Benjamin Greenleaf - 1858 - 444 Seiten
...the second term, and the larger for the first, when the ansirer should be less than the third term. **Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first** ; or divide the third term by the ratio of tlie first term to the second. NOTE 1. — When the first... | |
| Chambers W. and R., ltd - 1859
...below, can be carried on without thisreduction, according to Compound Multiplication and Division. 2. **Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first.** The quotient will be the answer sought, and is always of the same kind as the third term. In multiplying,... | |
| Emerson Elbridge White - 1861 - 332 Seiten
...and second terms of each of the simple ratios of the compound ratio as in SIMPLE PKOPORTION. Then, **multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the** product of the first terms. The quotient will be the answer. Or, Arrange the third and second terms... | |
| Charles Davies - 1863 - 336 Seiten
...when it is less, place the greater term there, and the remaining term in the second place. II. Then **multiply the second and third terms together, and divide their product by the first.** NOTES. — 1. If the first aud second terms have different units, they must be reduced to the same... | |
| |