...nuisance and not for the infringement of a right to a specific quantity of light. " There must bsi a substantial privation of light, sufficient to render the occupation of the house uncomfortable, and to prevent the plaintiff from carrying on his accustomed business . . . 011 the premises, as beneficially...

...the free access Interference of light to his house, and buildings are erected which cause Wlt lght' a substantial privation of light sufficient to render the occupation of the house uncomfortable, according to the ordinary notions of mankind, and to prevent the plaintiff from carrying on his business...

...Stacey (1826, 2 C. &. P. 465 ; 31 RR 679) Best, CJ directed the jury that in order to ground an action there must be a substantial privation of light sufficient...to render the occupation of the house uncomfortable and to prevent the plaintiff from carrying on his accustomed business (that of a grocer) as beneficially...

...so far back as the cases of Back v. Stacey (2 C. & P. 465) and Parker v. Smith (5 C. & P. 438) : " There must be a substantial privation of light sufficient...to render the occupation of the house uncomfortable and to prevent the plaintiff from carrying on his accustomed business as beneficially as he had formerly...

...which it might otherwise have been applied. In order to give a right of action and sustain the issue there must be a substantial privation of light, sufficient to render the occupation of the honse uncomfortable and to prevent the plaintiff from carrying on his accustomed business (that of...

...staircase and scullery on the first floor to some extent. As the result, he found as a fact that there was a substantial privation of light sufficient to render the occupation of the house uncomfortable, and to prevent the plaintiff from carrying on his accustomed business (that of a licensed victnaller)...