 ... judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts, even when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly.  Albany Law Journal - Seite 401875Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1879 - 750 Seiten
...Randall v. Brigham, 7 Wall., 523.) In the case last cited it is said of judges of Superior Courts : They are not liable to civil actions for their judicial...when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, unless perhaps they are done maliciously or corruptly. (Pages 536, 537.) And in the other cases a distinction... | |
 | 1926 - 1144 Seiten
...were not necessary to a correct statement of the law, and that judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly. A distinction must be here observed between excess of jurisdiction and the clear absence of all jurisdiction... | |
 | 1889 - 1878 Seiten
...case of Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, is that "judges of courts of record of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly." The principle on which such exemption is founded and maintained rests in public policy, and was established... | |
 | 1880 - 556 Seiten
...cásea, as in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, it is held that judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, aud are alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly; and a distinction is made between excess... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1881 - 828 Seiten
...cases, as in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wallace, 335, it is held that judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly; and a distinction is made between excess of jurisdiction and the clear absence of all jurisdiction... | |
 | 1881 - 1112 Seiten
...Supreme Court of the United States there held ' ' that Judges of Courts of Record of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...judicial acts, even when such acts are in excess of ilieir jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done maliciously and corruptly — a distinction... | |
 | 1881 - 1116 Seiten
...Supreme Court of the United States there held " that Judges of Courts of Record of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts, even luhen such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done maliciously... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 962 Seiten
...cases, as in Bradley v. fisher, 13 Wall. 335, it is held that judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly ; and a distinction is made between excess of jurisdiction and the clear absence of all jurisdiction... | |
 | 1884 - 762 Seiten
...were not necessary to a correct statement of the law, and that judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...judicial acts, even when such acts are in excess of thsir jurisdiction and are alleged to have beea done maliciously or corruptly. A distinction must be... | |
 | 1908 - 1164 Seiten
...Wall. 335, 20 L. Ed. G4C. where It was held that Judges of courts of record of superior or general Jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts, even when the acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done corruptly and maliciously."... | |
| |
