...specification ; and upon an action for the infrinjcement of the plaintiff's patent, the defendants pleaded that the plaintiff was not the first and true inventor of the pavement meni tioned m the specification. In support of this plea, evidence was given of a letter addressed...

...on the 28th September, 1836, for an improvement in the manufacture of iron. The declaration was in the usual form, and the defendants pleaded thereto,...was joined. Thirdly, after setting out at length the plaintiffs specification, the defendants pleaded, that the alleged improvement therein described, was...

...There were five pleas : First, that the Crown did not by the letters patent make the alleged grant : Secondly, that the plaintiff was not the first and true inventor of the supposed new manufacture as alleged : Thirdly, that the said invention was not a new manufacture :...

...Majesty did not by the said letters patent in the declaration mentioned, make such grant as alleged, — secondly, that the plaintiff was not the first and true inventor of the said supposed invention in the declaration mentioned, as alleged, — thirdly, that the said supposed invention...

...and that the defendants had afterwards infringed the patent right. The defendants pleaded : First ; Not guilty. Secondly ; That the plaintiff was not the first and true inventor. Thirdly ; That the invention was not new at the date of the patent. Fourthly ; That the invention was...

...after the date of the disclaimer, and concluded with a claim of an injunction and account. Pleas — Not guilty. Secondly, that the plaintiff was not the first and true inventor. Thirdly, that the invention was not new. Fourthly, that the invention was no manufacture. Fifthly,...

...here ordered and compelled to pay the amount of all such profits to the plaintiff. Pleas. — First, not guilty. Secondly, that the plaintiff was not the first and true inventor. Thirdly, that the invention was not a new invention. Fourthly, that the plaintiff did not, within six...

...had pleaded — 1st. Kot guilt)' ; 2nd. That the alleged manufacture was not a new manufacture ; 3rd. That the plaintiff was not the first and true inventor of the said manufacture ; 4th. That tbe alleged invention was not one for which Letters Patent could be granted...

...plaintiff claimed damages, and also an injunction and an account. The defendant pleaded, — first, not guilty, — secondly, that the plaintiff was not the first and true inventor of the said supposed new manufacture, as alleged, — thirdly, that the said supposed invention -was not a new...

...private *8411 roat ' s > courts, and "bridges, with timber, or wooden, blocks." The defendants pleaded " that the plaintiff was not the first and true inventor of the invention in the letters-patent and specification mentioned," besides various other pleas, which it...