... instituted for the purposes of mutual help, and not having capital stock or conducted for profit, or to forbid or restrain individual members of such organizations from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objects thereof; nor shall such organizations,... The World Almanac & Book of Facts - Seite 3051942Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 2006 - 164 Seiten
...organizations from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objects thereof; nor shall such organizations, or the members thereof, be held or construed to be...in restraint of trade, under the antitrust laws." Id. antitrust litigation that is frivolous or unfounded. Further, a joint venture that notifies the... | |
 | Richard Allen Epstein - 2006 - 184 Seiten
...organizations from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objects thereof; nor shall such organizations, or the members thereof, be held or construed to be...conspiracies in restraint of trade, under the antitrust laws.'41 85 This statute shows all the indelible marks of special interest legislation, which at the... | |
 | Charles Gardner Geyh - 2006 - 352 Seiten
...organizations from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objectives thereof; nor shall such organizations or members thereof, be held or construed to be illegal...conspiracies in restraint of trade under the antitrust laws.122 In 1921, however, the Supreme Court interpreted the Clayton Act's exemption for labor unions... | |
 | Anatole Anton, Richard Schmitt - 2007 - 538 Seiten
...organizations from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objects thereof; nor shall such organizations, or the members thereof, be held or construed to be...conspiracies in restraint of trade under the antitrust laws. Taken by itself the first sentence of this section would simply be false, since the labor of human... | |
 | Charles Gardner Geyh - 2009 - 360 Seiten
...organizations from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objectives thereof; nor shall such organizations or members thereof, be held or construed to be illegal...in restraint of trade under the antitrust laws.'" In 1921, however, the Supreme Court interpreted the Clayton Act's exemption for labor unions narrowly,... | |
| |