 | 1917 - 930 Seiten
...party is acting therein not on his own behalf, but for another.' 'This does not deny,' said Parke, B., 'that it is binding on those whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind ; but shows that it also binds another, by reason that the act of the agent, in signing the agreement in... | |
 | 1918 - 356 Seiten
...one which by its terms was not to be performed within one year from the making thereof, and therefore required to be in writing by the Statute of Frauds, and this question depended upon the time the corporation became bound by the contract which had originally been... | |
 | 1950 - 504 Seiten
...of the contract on the one hand to and charge with liability on the other the 10 unnamed principals and this whether the agreement be or be not required...those whom on the face of it it purports to bind; but shows that it also binds another by reason 15 that the act of the agent in signing the agreement in... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 850 Seiten
...party is acting therein not on his own behalf, but for another. 'This does not deny,' said Parke, B., 'that it is binding on those whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind; but shows that it also binds another, by reason that the act of the agent, in signing the agreement in... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 812 Seiten
...Senior (8 Mees. & Wels. 834), where the court, after using the language just cited from Chitty, say : " This evidence in no way contradicts the written agreement....whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind, but shows that it also binds another, by reason, that the act of the agent in signing the agreement in... | |
 | 1872 - 992 Seiten
...of the contract on the one hand to. and charge with liability on the other, the unnamed principals, and this whether the agreement be or be not required...evidence in no way contradicts the written agreement." The word "unnamed " there means not absolutely unnamed, but unnamed in the writing. BLACKBURN". J.---I... | |
 | 1871 - 1004 Seiten
...and charge with liability on the other, the unnamed principals ; and this whether the agreement he or be not required to be in writing by the Statute...evidence in no way contradicts the written agreement." If the principal be named at the time, he cannot afterwards bo charged, as by so doing you contradict... | |
| |
... it is competent to show that one or both of the contracting parties were agents for other persons and acted as such agents in making the contract, so as to give the benefit of the contract on the one hand to and charge with liability on the other... 
