Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

The Assembly sent for concurrence a resolution, in the words following:

Resolved (if the Senate concur) That a respectful message be sent to the Governor, requesting the return to the Assembly of Senate bill No. 137, entitled "An act to regulate the use of lands forming part of the right of way of any railroad company, the road of which has been removed from the surface in, or adjacent to, streets and highways in all cities of the first class in this State (Int. No. 137), for the purpose of amendment.

Mr. Marshall moved to non-concur in the passage of said resolution.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to said motion, and it was decided in the affirmative, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Ordered, That the Clerk return said resolution to the Assembly with a message that the Senate have non-concurred in the passage of the same.

The Assembly bill (No. 1582, Senate reprint No. 1435) entitled “An act to amend section 791 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to preference" (Rec. No. 307), was read the third time.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to the final passage of said bill, the same having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form for three calendar legislative days, and it was decided in the affirmative, a majority of all the Senators elected voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

1

Ordered, That the Clerk return said bill to the Assembly, with a message that the Senate have concurred in the passage of the same, with amendments.

The Assembly bill (No. 1454, Senate reprint No. 1436), entitled An act to amend chapter 371, Laws of 1896, in relation to auction sales" (Rec. No. 300), was read the third time.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to the final passage of said bill, the same having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form for three calendar legislative days, and it was decided in the affirmative, a majority of all the Senators elected voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Ordered, That the Clerk return said bill to the Assembly, with a message that the Senate have concurred in the passage of the same, with amendments.

The bill (No. 1462) entitled "An act to confer jurisdiction upon the Court of Claims to hear, audit and determine the alleged

claim of John Moore against the State for extra work performed and extra materials furnished in the construction of State building and ratifying the employment of said John Moore in relation thereto" (Int. No. 963), was read the third time.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to the final passage of said bill, the same having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form for three calendar législative days, and it was decided in the negative, a majority of all the Senators elected not voting in favor thereof, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Armstrong Davis G A Ellsworth Humphrey Thornton
Douglas Higgins Krum

Brown

9

Mr. White moved to reconsider the vote by which said bill was lost, and that said motion be laid upon the table.

[ocr errors]

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to said motion, and it was decided in the affirmative. The Assembly sent for concurrence the bill (No. 2392) entitled An act to amend chapter 425 of the Laws of 1896, entitled 'An act to amend the charter of the city of Poughkeepsie,' as amended by chapter 232 of the Laws of 1898" (Rec. No. 248), with a message that said bill was duly passed by the Assembly, March 9, 1899, and was transmitted to the Senate. Said bill was returned by the Senate March 30, 1899, with a message that they had duly concurred in the passage of the same. Said bill was on March 31, duly transmitted to the mayor of the city of Poughkeepsie, as provided by law, for a public hearing in said city and was returned by said mayor, April 6, 1899, with a message that said mayor and the common council, the legislative body of said city after a public hearing thereon, do approve said bill and do accept the same. Said bill was thereafter and on April 7, 1899,

duly delivered to the Governor. Said bill was thereafter and . on April 14, 1899, by concurrent resolution of the Senate and Assembly duly recalled from the Governor for the purpose of amendment. The vote upon the final passage of said bill having been reconsidered said bill was, on motion of Mr. Tripp, recommitted to the committee on affairs of cities, with instructions to amend as follows, and report forthwith: Page 28, lines 18, 19 and 20, strike out the words "the term of office of the supervisors now in office is hereby extended to the 31st day of December, 1899." Said bill as amended, was on April 22, 1899, read the third time and duly passed, a majority of all the members elected to the Assembly voting in favor thereof and three-fifths being present, said bill having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form at least three calendar legislative days prior to its final passage.

Mr. Ambler moved to reconsider the vote by which said bill was passed.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to reconsider the vote by which said bill was passed, and it was decided in the affirmative, a majority of all the Senators elected voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to the final passage of said bill, the same having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form for three calendar legislative days, and it was decided in the [SENATE JOURNAL.]

215

affirmative, a majority of all the Senators elected voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Ordered, That the Clerk return said bill to the Assembly, with a message that the Senate have concurred in the passage of the

same..

By direction of the President, the Clerk called the roll, when the following members answered as their names were called:

[blocks in formation]

The Assembly bill (No. 1114, Senate reprint No. 1438) entitled An act to authorize the construction of a bridge over the East river, over the Hudson river below Waterford, or over waters which are the boundaries of the State and to provide for the use thereof by railroad companies, bicyclists, trucks, carriages and foot passengers" (Rec. No. 302), was read the third time.

The President put the question whether the Senate would agree to the final passage of said bill, the same having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form for three calendar legislative days, and it was decided in the negative, a majority of all the Senators elected not voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present, as follows:

« ZurückWeiter »