 | Sir Edmund Saunders, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1824 - 494 Seiten
...one action against him for speaking these words, but each of them must bring a separate action, for the wrong done to one is no wrong done to the other. Cro. Car. 513. Smith v. Cooker. So two persons cannot join in an action of false imprisonment, or assault... | |
 | 1831 - 956 Seiten
...was agreed to by the other party or parties concerned in the contract. Hollands. Webb, 6 Law JKB 92. An action cannot be maintained jointly by two plaintiffs,...of special damage, the false imprisonment of both, ns well as the expenses incurred by them: — The court ordered the judgment to be arrested. But thejury... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1837 - 964 Seiten
...this verdict may be sustained. There an action was brought and a verdict obtained by two plaintiffs for a malicious arrest, the declaration alleging,...false imprisonment of both, as well as the expenses jointly incurred by them in procuring their liberty; and the jury having by their verdict confined... | |
 | Joseph Chitty, Thomas Chitty - 1837 - 860 Seiten
...those instances there is an entirety of interest, or a joint damage resulting from the tort. Where an action was brought, and a verdict obtained by two plaintiffs against a defendant for a malicious nrrest, and the declaration alleged as a special damage, not only a joint expense incurred, but also... | |
 | Joseph Rockwell Swan - 1845 - 680 Seiten
...of both, or the husband may sue alone.2 6 Although a joint action cannot, in general, be maintained, where the wrong done to one, is no wrong done to the other; yet, for expenses jointly incurred by two persons, in procuring their liberation from a malicious arrest... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Sir Edmund Saunders - 1845 - 602 Seiten
...(c) [Coparceners cannot distrain separately, nor sue separately for a porbring a separate action; for the wrong done to one is no wrong done to the other. Cro. Car. 513. Smith v. Cooker. So two persons cannot join in an action of false imprisonment, or assault... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1851 - 900 Seiten
...these instances there is an entirety of interest, or a joint damage resulting from the tort. Where an action was brought, and a verdict obtained by two...plaintiffs against a defendant for a malicious arrest, and the declaration alleged as a special damage, not only a joint expense incurred, 'but also the false... | |
 | William Tidd - 1856 - 976 Seiten
...of qui tam actions, on statutes merely penal, in which that cannot be done ; 10 Price, 9. So, where an action was brought, and a verdict obtained by two...of both, as well as the expenses incurred by them, though the action could not have been maintained in respect of the false imprisonment, the wrong done... | |
 | Albert Venn Dicey - 1870 - 582 Seiten
...one action against him for speaking these words, but each of them must bring a separate action ; for the wrong done to one is no wrong done to the other (.$). When several owners of mills brought an action for Separate not grinding corn thereat, it was... | |
 | Conway Robinson - 1858 - 804 Seiten
...that where two have a joint interest, they may join in the same action ; but that they cannot do so where the wrong done to one is no wrong done to the other, as in the case of false imprisonment or assault and battery. Best, CJ 10 JB Moore 446. Thus two persons... | |
| |
Where, therefore, an action was brought, and a verdict obtained, by two plaintiffs against a defendant, for a malicious arrest, the declaration alleging, by way of special damage, the false imprisonment of both... 
