Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

action and interaction. The lyric deals with passion and emotion in their simplicity and as such. For if a poem detail more story than is sufficient to make plain the situation out of which the emotion of the poem arises, it is to that extent an epic or narrative poem. And if a poem involve a conflict, the outcome of a succession of events or the result of a conflict in character or personality, the poem is to that degree dramatic. In words derived from the technical sciences, dramatic poetry is dynamic; lyric poetry is static. Hence the simplicity, the brevity, and the intensity of the finest lyrical poetry; and hence the argument, sometimes urged, that in the lyric alone have we the actual spirit and essence of poetry, and that the epic and the drama become poetry only in proportion as they contain the elements that add the soul of passion and the wings of song.

It is a moot question still with the dogmatists as to whether or not rhythm is the "essential fact of poetry"; 1 though few will go so far as to declare that "unmetrical" and "unpoetical" are interchangeable terms among the criteria of the poetical art. Lyrical poetry, more than any other, however, demands the aid of those devices of language which ally human speech to music. Rhythm ordered with artistic variety on the basis of an organic regularity; the recurrence of stress, pause, line, and stanza so that the pattern is repeated though with individual dis

1 For a discussion of this topic, with the conclusions of which the present writer does not agree, see F. B. Gummere, The Beginnings of Poetry, New York, 1901, chapter II.

tinction; melody in the sound and succession of words and harmony in their fitness for the thought and its changes such are some of the graces of form demanded of the lyrist. That the language of strong emotion often takes to itself, both in literature and in life, a rhythmic regularity, is an observation common to every school rhetoric, and, unlike some such observations, literally true. And it is not less true that emotion serves to clarify thought and add at times the flash of wit and the color of figurative expression. In the lyric better than in other varieties of poetry can we appreciate Wordsworth's famous definition of poetry as "the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings," even if the artistry and elaboration of many an individual poem of the type compel us likewise to recall Wordsworth's added words "recollected [we may interpolate, 'and lovingly wrought out'] in tranquillity."

The lyric, as we have seen, then, is personal and subjective, concerned with the poet himself, his thoughts, emotions, and sentiments. But this does not demand that lyrical poetry be of necessity autobiographical or fail of its end, the production of an artistic impression of subjective reality; for a poet may succeed at times in projecting his personality so to speak-into the person of another and speak and feel unerringly as that person speaks and feels. This power - and it is possessed only by the greatest—is usually called dramatic instinct; but in so far as it is poetic it is really lyrical, that is, wholly subjective. When Coleridge, for example, exclaims enthusiastically of Shakespeare, "What maiden has he

not taught delicacy, what counsellor has he not taught statecraft?" we find the critic recognizing that Shakespeare has so transfused himself into the personalities of his imagined personages that he realizes their emotions to a degree beyond that which we may reasonably expect of real beings under like circumstances; that is, he has, by an exercise of a subtle artistic sympathy, so typified the emotions of each that he has realized to us an art beyond nature. This is a subjective process, one inherent in the large heart acted on by the strong brain of the masterpoet. It is a matter of broad sympathies and unerring judgment; but it is also a matter of artistic insight, and has little to do with that "dramatic instinct” which, admirable in its own nature, is concerned more or less with the objective arrangement of material, the framing of situation, and the heightening of effect.

66

It is a demand of the lyric, which it shares with all good poetry, that it unite universality of feeling with unity of form. Turning, as the lyric must ever turn, on some single thought, feeling, or situation," it is easily unbalanced and its artistry destroyed. Most repugnant to this fragility is any attempt to hang on the delicate structure of a lyrical poem the pendant of a moral; for the mood induced by the poem thus becomes merely a means to an ulterior end and is destroyed in the very moment of its birth. Unity of subject requires a certain degree of brevity and the elimination of most of the elements which other varieties of verse possess in common with prose, elements justified in lyrical poetry only to the degree in which they

make for intelligibility. Thus, we must trespass neither in the direction of action, mixed motives, nor in that of an overplus of description or narrative, or the poem ceases to be lyrical. Unity of form follows unity of subject and adds to the effect of concentration. It is inconceivable that the lyric, which flourishes throughout English literature in so endless a variety, should be bound down to conventional form; and yet, the design or pattern once chosen in a given case, it must be preserved with the inevitability of the recurrent blossom of a chosen flower. Universality is obviously that quality which makes a work of art "not of an age but for all time"; and this quality is achieved only when the poet recognizes and makes his own those essential elements which give permanency to his theme and discards the accidental and the evanescent. The most perishable form of verse, for example, is satire; for although it rises at times to general applications because of the perennial moulds into which human vice and human folly are apt to run, satire is, none the less, apt to take the guise of concrete and passing allusion. Hall, Pope, and Butler must be read with notes not only for this reason, but because satire naturally runs to the type gathered into classes, and to caricature which emphasizes the non-essential lines of the picture and the perishable traits of humanity. The drama labors under a similar difficulty from the necessity which ties the scene, to a greater or less degree, to the accidents of time and place. The lyric, on the other hand, from its simplicity and celebration of universal feeling, has a better chance

of permanency. While men are lovers and women fair, we shall take pleasure in the thousands of changes sung upon the immortal theme of love; and while the conditions of human life are what they are and ever have been, we shall love to have the poets tell us:

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

or listen to the noble, timeworn theme:

The glories of our blood and state

Are shadows, not substantial things;

There is no armor against fate;

Death lays his icy hand on kings:
Sceptre and crown

Must tumble down,

And in the dust be equal made

With the poor crooked scythe and spade.

The range of the lyric is the gamut of human emotion, and nothing could be more inept than the current notion of a lyric as merely a poem of love. The lyrist may sing the raptures of a pure soul in communion with God, or the apples of Sodom that turn to dust and bitterness between the teeth of the lost sinner: and there is much between hell and heaven. Indeed, here as elsewhere, there can be no limits set to art. Wit, humor, folly, fancy, cynicism, misanthropy (if it be "literatesque" like Diogenes' tub), all may serve the lyrist. The gods laughed on Olympus and went to feast and revel with the Ethiopians. Literature has no need for the limitations of a false dignity, for life does not know them. And yet there are dangers to the lyric in some emotions. Thus,

« ZurückWeiter »