She strode two steps, and stretched her hand, In attitude of stern command; The tremor of her voice and tread Had more of passion than of dread, The net had parted from her hair, The locks fell down in the powerless air, Her frame with strange convulsion rocked,— And Vidal was intensely shocked. He loved, as thou couldst never love,- I know by whom the blood was spilt, And life to me was lorn and blighted, He died, and vengeance watches well! He died, and thou wert well requited!" 1 Ten? Ten did you ever, Mrs. Anne? rogues against one honest man ! I saw him on his legs just now, What! sawed his legs off? well, I vow Peace, babbler, peace! you see you've shocked her! And, try to keep the Friar away!" Poor Vidal, who, amid the rout, Had crept in cautious silence out, Reeled to his chamber in the staggers, And thought of home, and dreamed of daggers. Day dawned; the Baroness was able Days past, and weeks: Clotilda's mien And only once or twice her glance The morrow came, 'twas glorious weather, To hold his stirrup and his rein, And say, "Heaven speed!" with might and main. Clotilda only said "Farewell!" And gave her hand to kiss and clasp ; He thought it trembled, as it fell In silence from his lip and grasp, And yet upon her cheek and brow "Farewell!" she said, and so departed; END OF CANTO I. CRUMBS OF CRITICISM. "A marvel it is to think, Swertha, how few real judicious men are left in this land. 1 ken few of consequence hereabouts, (excepting always myself, and may be you, Swertha,) but what may, in some sense or other, be called a fule."-PIRATE, Vol. II. p. 278. ON THE PLAYS OF SIR JOHN SUCKLING. -'s Have you read the plays of Sir John Suckling, reader? If not, we recommend you by all means to postpone the perusal till you have finished Quentin Durward, and the present number of the Quarterly Magazine; or rather to adjourn it sine die unless you are a reader of old books in the abstract, or are actuated by the ambition of doing what nobody within fifteen miles of you has done: otherwise, ten to one but you will find yourself in the condition of a prim critic in Weekly, who declared that he found it utterly impossible to get through them; just as Dr. Johnson said long ago of Thomson's Liberty. We are not gifted with more than the ordinary critical stock of patience, and yet we managed to perform the feat, at the expense of much less snuff than Lord Chesterfield bestowed on the six latter books of the Æneid. We have no reason to assign for this rash act. It was one of the things which people undertake without any assignable motive, and finish because it would be a pity not to complete what they have begun; not but we might have been worse employed. We might have been idling on our sofa under the influence of the κυανόπτεροι αλάστορες, or chopping logic with a spinster of the same hue; we might have been imbibing the latest tirade against kings and priests in the Morning Chronicle, or listening with lulled senses to the Courier's soporific purr of unvaried acquiescence in things established; we might have been washing down the newest rifacciamento of the quarterly jokes upon Hazlitt, with the fifth dilution of our evening tea pot; we might have been reading Tom and Jerry, or the Scottish Chiefs, or the article on Nightingales in the Classical Journal, or a great many other things, all and each worse than reading Sir John Suckling's plays. It is true, that these pieces are not very dramatic; that the composition is in most parts incorrect; that there are no original characters in them-no artifices of plot-few striking situations-very little scepticism-hardly any misanthropy-and not a word of destiny. Still they are not to be sneered at, at least in these days. They are more moral than Bertram, more poetical than Don Carlos, more original than Werner, more unaffected than |