SPALDING V. STODDER. (October 13, 1891.) Error to the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois. See 24 Fed. Rep. 89. The Attorney General, for plaintiff in erfor. Percy L. Shuman and Henry E. Tremain, for defendant in error. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs and interest, on motion of the solicitor general for plaintiff in error. TAFT V. MARSILY. (October 3, 1891.) Error to the supreme court of the state of New York. See 24 N. E. Rep. 926. Henry D. Hotchkiss, for plaintiff in error. D. M. Porter, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, pursuant to the twenty-eighth rule. TATEM V. CHADWICK. (December 21, 1891.) Appeal from the supreme court of the state SPALDING LUMBER Co. v. UNITED STATES. of Montana. See 23 Pac. Rep. 729. (May 16, 1892.) Error to the circuit court of the United States for the western district of Michigan. F. O. Clark, for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General, for the United States. No opinion. Dismissed, on motion of the attorney general for defendant in error, and consent of counsel for plaintiff in error. SPRINGS V. GLENN. (November 20, 1891.) Error to the circuit court of the United States for the western district of North Carolina. See 26 Fed. Rep. 494. W. E. Earle, W. D. Davidge, and Reginald Fendall, for plaintiff in error. Charles Marshall and John Howard, for defendant in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. STANDARD LIFE & ACC. INS. Co. OF DETROIT V. HUTCHCRAFT. (January 14, 1892.) Error to the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of Ohio. John Atkinson, for plaintiff in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. M. F. Morris and J. C. Robinson, for appellant. Henry E. Davis, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. TOMS V. OWEN. (October 28, 1891.) Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Michigan. C. I. Walker, for appellant. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. C. I. Walker, for appellant. TOPLITZ V. MERRITT. (April 29, 1892.) Error to the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of New York. Stephen G. Clarke, for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General, for defendant in er ror. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. TORRENT V. DULUTH LUMBER CO. (November 6, 1891.) Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Minnesota. See 30 Fed. Rep. 830. R. A. Parker, for appellant. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. |