Patent and Trade Mark Review, Band 20Trade Activities, Incorporated, 1922 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-5 von 68
Seite 19
... examiner of the Patent Office de- clared that the trade - mark was no longer valid and ordered its cancel- lation . From this decision no ap- peal was taken and that feature of the case therefore falls out of con- sideration ...
... examiner of the Patent Office de- clared that the trade - mark was no longer valid and ordered its cancel- lation . From this decision no ap- peal was taken and that feature of the case therefore falls out of con- sideration ...
Seite 28
... Examiner of Trade Marks for refusal of registration . SMITH & HEMENWAY COMPANY , INC . , V. RICE MANUFACTUR- ING COMPANY . Ms. D. August 31 , 1921 . Class of Goods . Pneumatic rivet breaking or cutting and punch- ing machines held to be ...
... Examiner of Trade Marks for refusal of registration . SMITH & HEMENWAY COMPANY , INC . , V. RICE MANUFACTUR- ING COMPANY . Ms. D. August 31 , 1921 . Class of Goods . Pneumatic rivet breaking or cutting and punch- ing machines held to be ...
Seite 29
... Examiner of Interferences held that it satisfactorily showed inter- state use . The Commissioner en- tertained an appeal and affirmed the Examiner's ruling , holding the applicant entitled to register . The Commissioner ruled that the ...
... Examiner of Interferences held that it satisfactorily showed inter- state use . The Commissioner en- tertained an appeal and affirmed the Examiner's ruling , holding the applicant entitled to register . The Commissioner ruled that the ...
Seite 32
... Examiner refused to register the mark in view of two prior regis- trations , ( No. 37,363 and 37,905 ) , each showing the words " Big 4 " and the figure 4 , but each also in- cluding other matter . The Assist- ant Commissioner held the ...
... Examiner refused to register the mark in view of two prior regis- trations , ( No. 37,363 and 37,905 ) , each showing the words " Big 4 " and the figure 4 , but each also in- cluding other matter . The Assist- ant Commissioner held the ...
Seite 44
... Examiner finds reasons for rejecting an applica- tion , he is , before giving final de- cision , to show his reasons ... examiners also , and new provisions have been introduced al- lowing applicants to take exception of certain judges ...
... Examiner finds reasons for rejecting an applica- tion , he is , before giving final de- cision , to show his reasons ... examiners also , and new provisions have been introduced al- lowing applicants to take exception of certain judges ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
advertising alleged amended American applicant's application Aspirin Assistant Commissioner Asst attorney Aunt Jemima Beiersdorf Brazil Buenos Aires Convention Bulgaria cancellation certificate claim Class Clayton Act Commerce Commissioner of Patents Company Convention Court of Appeals cutlery decision decree defendant descriptive divisional application effect entitled Examiner of Interferences expiration fact FENNING filament filed granted held Industrial Property infringement interference proceedings International invention inventor issue July July 29 June label license manufacture mark consisting matter ment months Official Gazette opposer opposer's opposition opposition proceeding owner ownership pany paragraph parties Patent and Trade Patent Law Patent Office payment person petition petitioner plaintiff plication prior priority protection provisions referred regard regis registered mark Registrar registration rule Salicylic Acid Section sell sold term thereof tion trade mark tration Treaty Treaty of Neuilly tungsten unfair United valid word
Beliebte Passagen
Seite 230 - ... owner; and this affiant has no reason to believe that any other person, association, or corporation has any interest direct or indirect in the said stock, bonds, or other securities than as so stated by him. 5. That the average number of copies of each issue of this publication sold or distributed, through the mails or otherwise, to paid subscribers during the six months...
Seite 239 - ... on the condition, agreement or understanding that the lessee or purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies or other commodities of a competitor or competitors of the lessor or seller, where the effect of such lease, sale, or contract for sale or such condition, agreement or understanding may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce.
Seite 186 - The several courts vested with jurisdiction of cases arising under the patent laws shall have power to grant injunctions according to the course and principles of courts of equity, to prevent the violation of any right secured by patent, on such terms as the court may deem reasonable...
Seite 151 - That unfair methods of competition in commerce are hereby declared unlawful. The commission is hereby empowered and directed to prevent persons, partnerships, or corporations, except banks, and common carriers subject to the acts to regulate commerce, from using unfair methods of competition in commerce.
Seite 8 - Managers none. 2. That the owners are: (Give names and addresses of individual owners, or, if a corporation, give its name and the names and addresses of stockholders owning or holding 1 per cent or more of the total amount of stock.) The National Historical Society.
Seite 8 - DRAMA, and that the following is, to the best of his knowledge and belief, a true statement of the ownership, management (and if a daily paper, the circulation), etc., of the aforesaid publication for the date shown in the above caption, required by the Act...
Seite 152 - The essence of the wrong consists in the sale of the goods of one manufacturer or vendor for those of another.
Seite 238 - In considering the operation of this judgment, it should be borne in mind, as stated by counsel, that there is a difference between the effect of a judgment as a bar or estoppel against the prosecution of a second action upon the same claim or demand, and its effect as an estoppel in another action between the same parties upon a different claim or cause of action.
Seite 260 - ... merely in words or devices which are descriptive of the goods with which they are used, or of the character or quality of such goods...
Seite 238 - But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment rendered upon one cause of action to matters arising in a suit upon a different cause of action, the inquiry must always be as to the point or question...