Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

29 Oct. 1938
LIBRARY

Dr. Gardner W. Allen

DEPOSITED IN THE

GRADUATE SCHOOL OF

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, TO WIT:

DISTRICT CLERK'S OFFICE.

Be it remembered, that on the twelfth day of January, A. D. 1819, and in the forty-third year of the Independence of the United States of America, Thomas B. Wait, of the said district, has deposited in this office the title of a book, the right whereof he claims as proprietor, in the words following, to wit:

"State Papers and Publick Documents of the United States, from the accession of George Washington to the Presidency, exhibiting a complete view of our Foreign Relations since that time. Third edition. Published under the patronage of Congress. Including Confidential Documents, first published in the second edition of this work."

In conformity to the act of the Congress of the United States, entitled, "An act for the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of Maps, Charts, and Books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned:" and also to an act, entitled, "An act supplementary to an act, entitled, An act for the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of Maps, Charts, and Books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies during the times therein mentioned; and extending the benefits thereof to the arts of Designing, Engraving and Etching Historical, and other Prints."

JNO. W. DAVIS,

Clerk of the District of Massachusetts.

The date of the certificate of copy right in Vols. 1, 11 and X1, instead

of the first should be the twelfth day of January.

CONTENTS.

Fage

DOCUMENTS accompanying President's message, Nov. 8, 1808,relative
to Berlin decree and French depredations-continued from vol. vi. 5

Letters from Gen. Armstrong relative to ship Horizon

Mr. Pinkney to Mr. Madison, relative to transit duty on cotton, &c.

Mr. Pinkney to Mr. Madison, May, 1808, enclosing notification of

blockade of Zealand, &c.

Mr. Pinkney to Mr. Canning, Aug. 23, 1808, proposing to suspend em-
bargo, on condition of repealing orders in council
Correspondence between Mr. Erskine and Mr. Madison

[ocr errors]

927

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Extract of a letter from general Armstrong to Secretary of State, Feb.
17, enclosing note from M. Champagny, Feb. 14, 1810

Same to same, stating the emperor's complaints against America, and

that he had determined to sell American property seized in Spain,

March 10, 1810

459

467

Same to same, May 24, 1810, enclosing copy of Rambouillet decree
Duke of Cadore to general Armstrong, relative to non-intercourse law,

-

and stating that he is authorized to declare that the Berlin and
Milan decrees are revoked, &c. Aug. 5, 1810
Note from same, notifying that American vessels not denationalized
will be admitted into French ports, Sept. 12, 1810

Papers in relation to West Florida, accompanying President's message

Dec. 5, 1810

Message, Dec. 28, 1810, transmitting report of Secretary of State, en.
closing French decree admitting thirty or forty American vessels;
correspondence of Secretary of State with general Turreau; and
letter from general Armstrong relative to French duties

468

475

478

490-500

AMERICAN STATE PAPERS.

[ocr errors]

DOCUMENTS

ACCOMPANYING THE PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE OF NOVEMBER 8, 1808.

[Continued from Vol. VI.]

Extract of a Letter from Mr. Madison to Gen. Armstrong. Department of State, July 22, 1808.

"YOUR despatches by lieutenant Lewis were delivered

on the 8th instant.

It is regretted that the interval between his arrival and the date of your letter to M. Champagny, during which I presume some verbal intercommunication must have taken place, had produced no indication of a favourable change in the views of the French government with respect to its decrees; and still more that instead of an early and favourable answer to your letter, it should have been followed by such a decree as is reported to have been issued on the 22d April, at Bayonne. The decree has not yet reached the United States, and therefore its precise import cannot be ascertained. But if it should be, as it is represented, a sweeping stroke at all American vessels on the high seas, it will not only extend our demands of reparation, but is rendered the more ominous with respect to the temper and views of the emperor towards the United States by the date of the measure.

The arrival of Mr. Baker with my letter of May 2d, of which a copy is herewith sent, will have enabled you to resume the subject of the decrees with the fairest opportunity that could be giver. to the French government for a change of the unjust and unwise course which has been pursued, and I assure myself that you will not have failed

[blocks in formation]

to turn the communications with which you are furnished to the best account. If France does not wish to throw the United States into the war against her, for which it is impossible to find a rational or plausible inducement, she ought not to hesitate a moment, in revoking at least so much of her decrees as violate the rights of the sea, and furnish to her adversary the pretext for his retaliating measures. It would seem as if the imperial cabinet had never paid sufficient attention to the smallness of the sacrifice which a repeal of that portion of its system would involve, if an act of justice is to be called a sacrifice.

The information by the return of the Osage from England is not more satisfactory than that from France.Nothing was said on the subject of the Chesapeake, nor any thing done or promised as to the orders in council. It is probable that further accounts from the United States were waited for, and that the arrival of the St. Michael I will have led to a manifestation of the real views of that government on those and other subjects. In the mean time it cannot be doubted that hopes were cherished there of some events in this country favourable to the policy of the orders, and particularly that the offensive language and proceedings of France, would bring on a hostile resistance from the United States; in which case the British government would be able to mould every thing to its satisfaction. There is much reason to believe that if the British government should not concur in a mutual abolition of the orders and of the embargo, it will result from an unwillingness to set an example which might be followed and might consequently put an end to the irritating career of her enemy, on which the calculation is built. Might not use be made of this view of the matter in those frank and friendly conversations which sometimes best admit topicks of a delicate nature, and in which pride and prejudice can be best managed, without descending from the necessary level? In every view it is evidently proper, as far as respect to the national honour will allow, to avoid a style of procedure which might co-operate with the policy of the British government, by stimulating the passions of the French."

« ZurückWeiter »