Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

"to be the same as far as it was adapted to our circumstances, and was not varied by the power which was "capable of changing it. The great value of a series of "judicial decisions in prize cases, and on other questions depending on the Law of Nations, is, that they render "certain and stable the loose general principles of that Law, "and show their application, and how they are understood, in "the country where the tribunals are sitting. They are, "therefore, deservedly received with very great respect, and are presumptive, though not conclusive, evidence of the Law "in the given case. This was the language of the Supreme "Court of the United States so late as 1815: and the "decisions of the English High Court of Admiralty, especially since the year 1798, have been consulted and uniformly respected by that Court as enlightened commen"taries on the Law of Nations, and affording a vast variety of "instructive precedents for the application of the principles "of that Law."

66

66

66

Few names have obtained greater celebrity upon questions of International Law than that of Dr. Story; and with his opinion this branch of the subject may be concluded: "How "few," he says, "have read with becoming reverence and "zeal the decisions of that splendid jurist-the ornament, I "will not say, of his own age or country, but of all ages and "all countries; the intrepid supporter equally of neutral and "belligerent rights; the pure and spotless magistrate of "nations, who has administered the dictates of universal "jurisprudence with so much dignity and discretion in the "Prize and Instance Courts of England!-Need I pronounce "the name of Sir William Scott?"

During the last Russian war the English Prize Tribunals— both the High Court of Admiralty and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council-applied to the cases brought before them the principles of the American and English judgments as of equal authority.

During the late civil war in the United States the tribunals of both belligerents professed to administer, and with

very few exceptions did administer, the law as already expounded by these Courts.

The seal of Courts of Admiralty, being also Courts of International Law, is judicially taken notice of, without positive proof of its authenticity, by the Courts of all Nations (g).

(g) Yeaton v. Fry, 5 Cranch (American) Rep. pp. 335, 343 (Ch. J. Marshall); Thompson v. Stewart, 3 Con. (American) Rep. p. 171; 2 Kent's Commentaries, p. 121, note. But the rule is different as to the seal of other foreign courts: Delafield v. Hand, 3 Johns. (American) Rep. p. 310; Desobrey v. Laistre, 2 Harr. & Johns. (American) Rep. p. 192; Henry v. Adey, 3 East, 221.

CHAPTER VII.

WRITERS ON INTERNATIONAL LAW.

LVIII. THE consent of nations is further evidenced by the concurrent testimony of great writers (a) upon International Jurisprudence. The works of some of them have become recognized digests of the principles of the science; and to them every civilized country yields great, if not implicit, homage (b).

When Grotius wrote his immortal work he derived but little help (c) from any predecessor in the noble career which

(a) See some very sensible remarks on this head, by M. Ortolan, Diplomatie de la Mer, 1. i. c. iv. t. i. p. 74, &c.

"Text writers of authority showing what is the approved usage of nations, or the general opinion respecting their mutual conduct, with the definitions and modificatious introduced by general consent," are placed as the second branch of International Law by Wheaton.—El. of Int. Law, vol. i. p. 59.

(b) The English courts of Common Law, and English commentators upon that law, both in cases of public and private International Law, have been in the habit of referring to other works of these foreign authors, as containing evidence of the law to be administered in England: e. g. see Comyn's Digest, tit. Ambassador, where Grotius is cited. See the authorities cited by Lord Mansfield in the cases relating to ambassadorial privileges, mentioned in a later part of this work; and see the whole part of this work on Comity, or Private International Law. Lord Mansfield, in fact, built up the fabric of English Commercial Law upon the foundation of the principles contained in the works of foreign jurists. In the Admiralty and Ecclesiastical Courts, these works had been always referred to as authorities. It is by these courts indeed, and the practitioners therein, that the study of Civil and International Law was alone preserved from perishing in these Islands: the seed was sown and kept alive in them, which subsequently bore fruit of which no country need be ashamed. See Preface, by Dr. Phillimore, to Sir G. Lee's Reports.

(c) Grotii Prolegomena, xxiii., as to the auxilia scripti which he had. "Solent autem gentium sententiæ de eo quod inter illas justum esse

he chose for himself. Albericus Gentilis, Arthur Duck, and Suarez had indeed left him materials of which he fully availed himself, as well as of the labours of publicists like Ayala and Bacon, and of the commentators on the Civil and Canon Law; but he may be almost said to have himself laid the foundation of that great pillar of International Law-the authority of International Jurists. His own book, one of the firmest barriers yet erected by Christendom against barbarism, and the works of some subsequent writers upon the same subject, have long obtained the honour of being the repositories to which nations have recourse for argument to justify their acts or fortify their claims. They are, indeed, with the modifications that reason and usage apply, admitted umpires in International disputes; and this fact has greatly contributed, and still does contribute, to clothe the Law of Nations, more and more, with the precision and certainty of positive and municipal law.

The value ascribed to the opinion (d) of each writer, in the event of there being a difference between them, is a point upon which it is impossible to lay down a precise rule; but among the criteria of it will be the length of time by which it is, as it were, consecrated, the period when it was expressed, the reasoning upon which it rests, the usage by which it has been since strengthened, and to the previous existence of which it testifies (e).

debet triplici modo manifestari, moribus scilicet et usu, pactis et fœderibus, et tacita approbatione juris regularum, a prudentibus ex ipsis rerum causis per interpretationem et per rationem deductarum.”— Warnkönig, Doctrina Juris Philosophica Aphorismis Distincta (a most valuable little work), s. 146 p. 190.

(d) No rule of International Law exists like that of the Imperial Law of Rome, which decided that the opinions of Papinianus, Paulus Gaius, Vlpianus, and Modestinus should have the force of law; that in points where they differed, the opinion of the majority, and, where they were equally divided, the side on which Papinianus was found, should prevail.—Th. Cod. i. 4, De responsis Prudentum L. un.; Ib. ix. 3, L. un. Pr. de Sent. Pass.: Cod. ix. 51, 13 de Sent. Pass.; Muhlenbruch, Doctr. Pand. Pr. s. 8.

(e) Vattel cited "as a witness as well as a lawyer."-The Maria, 1 C. Rob. Adm. Rep. p. 363. See the case generally on this point.

When, on the other hand, their authority, in the absence of any contrary usage or convention, may be safely said to be binding upon all nations: "All writers upon the Law "of Nations unanimously acknowledge it," is not the least of Lord Stowell's arguments for the Belligerent's right of search (f).

"In cases where the principal jurists agree," Chancellor Kent says, "the presumption will be very great in favour "of the solidity of their maxims; and no civilized nation "that does not arrogantly set all ordinary law and justice at "defiance will venture to disregard the uniform sense of the "established writers of International Law" (g).

And how great is the advantage of this, that a controversy between France and England should be capable of being referred to principles laid down by an arbitrator who existed long before the disunion arose, and whom it is impossible to accuse of partiality! This remark supposes the reference made to a neutral jurist, belonging to neither country; but the advantage is not so limited-it may be that the authorities belonging to the very country which is urging a demand will be found to pronounce against it.

If the authority of Zouch, of Lee, of Mansfield, and, above all, of Stowell, be against the demand of England—if Valin, Domat, Pothier, and Vattel (1) be opposed to the pretensions of France-if Grotius and Bynkershoek confute the claim of Holland - Puffendorf (i) that of Sweden - if

(f) The Maria, 1 C. Rob. Adm. Rep. p. 360. (g) Kent's Commentaries, vol. i. p. 19.

(h) "I stand with confidence upon all fair principles of reason— upon the distinct authority of Vattel-upon the Institutes of other great maritime countries as well as those of our own countries—when I venture to lay it down that, by the Law of Nations," &c.-The Maria, 1 C. Rob. Adm. Rep. p. 369.

(1) So, in the case of the Swedish Convoy, Lord Stowell said: "If authority is required, I have authority-and not the less weighty in this question for being Swedish authority; I mean the opinion of that distinguished person-one of the most distinguished which that country (fertile as it has been of eminent men) has ever produced-I mean

[ocr errors]
« ZurückWeiter »