West's Encyclopedia of American Law, Band 1Thomson/Gale, 2005 - 476 Seiten West's Encyclopedia of American Law contains a comprehensive overview of American law in 13-volumes covering historical and current terms, concepts, events, movements, cases, and persons significant to U.S law. Including 5,000 entries that range from brief definitions of legal jargon to exhaustive examinations of court-room procedure, from explanations of complex topics such as civil rights to biographies of standout attorneys, from analyses of controversial issues such as gun control to transcripts of crucial Supreme Court decisions. Each entry was written, updated, and reviewed by lawyers and professors with the layperson or beginning student in mind.The layout of this edition includes: Entries contain definition and explanatory text The 94 sidebars provide brief highlights and add informative details of some facets of main entries while the 89 In Focus pieces complement main entries with details and arguments on interesting, important, or controversial issues Two appendix volumes contain over one hundred primary documents, including: milestone Supreme Court decisions & briefs; foundations of U.S. law; civil rights laws and commentary; presidential speeches; and scholarly essaysTopics in this edition include: Abandonment Absentee voting Defamation Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty Internet Fraud Movie rating Patent and Tradem Roman Law Martin Van Buren And much more |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 88
Seite 127
... Question 4 ( a ) should be answered in the nega- tive : and question 4 ( b ) in the affirmative III . Questions 5 ( a ) , ( b ) and ( c ) should be answered in the negative IV . Question 5 ( d ) should also be answered in the negative I ...
... Question 4 ( a ) should be answered in the nega- tive : and question 4 ( b ) in the affirmative III . Questions 5 ( a ) , ( b ) and ( c ) should be answered in the negative IV . Question 5 ( d ) should also be answered in the negative I ...
Seite 129
... Question 4 ( b ) should be answered in the affirmative . III . QUESTIONS 5 ( A ) , ( B ) AND ( C ) SHOULD BE ... Question 4 ( b ) , then the Board of Education should be permitted to manage the readjust- ment , subject only to the usual ...
... Question 4 ( b ) should be answered in the affirmative . III . QUESTIONS 5 ( A ) , ( B ) AND ( C ) SHOULD BE ... Question 4 ( b ) , then the Board of Education should be permitted to manage the readjust- ment , subject only to the usual ...
Seite 366
... questions to be put to the venire in qualifying the jurors . The appellant contends that The Times was unlawfully deprived of its right to question the jury venire to ascertain the existence of bias or prejudice . The trial court ...
... questions to be put to the venire in qualifying the jurors . The appellant contends that The Times was unlawfully deprived of its right to question the jury venire to ascertain the existence of bias or prejudice . The trial court ...
Inhalt
EDUCATION OF TOPEKA | 2 |
Memorandum Decision of the Supreme Court June 8 1953 | 33 |
Opinion of the Supreme Court May 17 1954 | 130 |
Urheberrecht | |
3 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
Abortion Laws action advertisement Alabama alleged amicus curiae APPELLANTS AND RESPONDENTS appellees applied argument arrest attorney basis Board of Education Bowers charge citizens City civil rights Code color confession Congress constitutional rights crime criminal damages decision defendant denied desegregation discrimination dissenting District Court Due Process Clause effect enforcement Equal Protection Clause Escobedo evidence fact federal Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Hallford homosexual homosexual conduct individual injunctive interrogation issue judgment jurisdiction jury Justice Kansas L.Ed legislation legislature libel liberty ment Miranda Montgomery moral Negro OCTOBER 1963 BRIEF official opinion person petitioners plaintiff police privilege prohibiting prosecution public schools question race racial racial segregation rational basis review RESPONDENTS ON REARGUMENT right to counsel rule S.Ct separate but equal sexual sion sodomy sodomy law statement statute supra tion tional Topeka trial U.S. SUPREME COURT United violation York