Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

petitioning creditor to be amended; and will not stay the issuing of the fiat, at the instance of another creditor competing for it, on account of an alleged irregularity in the bond. Re Lees, 3 Dea. 36.

ANNUITY.

A. grants an annuity to C.; and B., as the surety of A., jointly and severally covenants with C. to pay the annuity; provided that if default should be made in payment of the annuity by A., C. would give notice in writing of so much of the annuity as might be in arrear, twenty-one days previous to the adoption of any measures against B. to enforce the payment of them. B. becomes bankrupt, before any default is made by A. in the payment of the annuity.— Held, that C. could not prove for the value of the annuity, under the provisions of the 6 Geo. 4. c. 16. s. 54. Ex parte Marks, re Colnaghi, 3 Dea.

133.

The bankrupt granted an annuity of 421., in consideration of 4007., and received the whole of the consideration money, through the medium of the attorney employed by him in the transaction. Half an hour afterwards, at a different place, he repaid 1001. of this sum to the attorney, in discharge of a debt-Held, that this was not a return, or retainer, of part of the consideration money, within the provisions of the annuity act; and that the value of the annuity was

proveable under the fiat. Ex parte Bogue, re Basun, 3 Dea. 314.

Where the bankrupt in a deed, by which he granted an annuity to the petitioner, acknowledged a certain. sum to have been received by him, as the consideration money for the annuity; and, in a memorandum also of an account between him and the petitioner, admitted the same sum to be due; and the annuity was paid by him for ten years, without any impeachment of the consideration; the Court would not reject the right of the petitioner to prove, or claim, for the value of the annuity, because the bankrupt had made an affidavit that the whole of the consideration money, as stated in the memorial of the annuity, was not advanced by the petitioners to the bankrupts. Ex parte Fairman, re Lloyd, 3 Dea. 467.

ANNULLING FIAT.

(On Applications by the Bankrupt.) Although the bankrupt obtains a verdict in an action against his assignees disputing his bankruptcy, yet if the petitioning creditor is not a party to the action, it is not of course to annul the fiat. Ex parte M'Intosh, re M'Intosh, 3 Dea. 9.

A fiat may be annulled, with consent of all the creditors, before the 42nd day, if two meetings have been held for proof of debts. Ex parte Foulkes, re Foulkes, 3 Dea. 11. S. C. 3 Mont. 725.

On a petition to annul or reverse

the adjudication, the Court will look at the depositions on the proceedings, to see whether they are sufficient to support the fiat; if insufficient, and the petitioning creditor, or assignees, offer no further evidence, the fiat is annulled as of course; but if sufficient, the Court will give the bankrupt an opportunity to contravert the statements contained in the depositions. Ex parte Field, re Field, 3 Dea. 24.

To induce the Court to annul a fiat, on the bankrupt's suggestion that the object of the petitioning creditor in issuing it was to dissolve a partnership subsisting between the bankrupt and other persons,-the Court must be quite satisfied, that that was the sole object of the petitioning creditor. Ex parte Parkes, re Parkes, 3 Dea. 31.

On a petition by the bankrupt to annul the fiat, for want of the proper requisites, when the affidavits are diametrically opposite as to the facts, the Court will direct either a vivá voce examination, or an issue; which, if taken by the bankrupt, will be under his liability to the costs. Ex parte Bunn, re Bunn, 3 Dea. 120.

The bankrupt concocted a fraudulent fiat, in concert with the petitioning creditor, upon a fictitious debt; but, three days before it issued, gave notice to the other parties, that he would go no further with the project; and, after it issued, petitioned to annul it :-Held, that, being particeps criminis, he had no locus standi to present a petition for that purpose.

Ex parte Nainby, re Nainby, 3 Dea.

121.

On a bona fide petition of the bankrupt to annul, the Court will let him see the proceedings, or order him to be provided with copies of the depósitions; aliter, if the Court suspect it is not the petition of the bankrupt, but of a third party for a clandestine purpose. Ex parte Foster, re Foster, 3 Dea. 175.

It is of course to annul a fiat, with costs, for want of prosecution, on the application of the bankrupt; unless the petitioning creditor presents a petition for further time to open it. Ex parte Jones, re Jones, 3 Dea. 230.

If a creditor, who is a party to a deed of assignment of a trader's property for the benefit of his creditors, issues a fiat against him, it will be annulled with costs. Ex parte Bunn, re Bunn, 3 Dea. 119.

On a petition by the bankrupt to annul, for want of an act of bankruptcy, the respondent must prove the affirmative. Ex parte Welden, re Welden, 3 Dea. 240.

Any new depositions taken before the Commissioners, upon a reference back to them to review the adjudication, will be admissible in evidence to support the fiat. Ibid.

The circumstance of a petition having been presented to the Lord Chancellor to annul a fiat, is not a suffi

cient reason for the Court of Review declining to hear a petition on a collateral matter under the same fiat. Ex parte Higgs, re Evans, 3 Dea. 474.

[graphic]

A joint stock banking company,during the pendency of a suit in equity brought by them against one of its members, for enforcing certain securities against him, and for an account,-proceed against him under the 1 & 2 Vict. c. 110. s. 8. (the Act for the Abolition of Arrest on Mesne Process), for the purpose of making him a bankrupt; their public officer swearing to a debt of 15,000l. being due from him, of which 90007. was in dispute; they proceed to adjudication, and obtain from the Commissioners a provisional assignment to themselves; no other creditors appearing to prove, and no assignees being chosen under the fiat. The bankrupt having petitioned to annul the fiat, stating, that he was solvent, and that the Company had not given him credit for 9000l. :-Held, that the Court was bound, in the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction, to annul the fiat; as it appeared to have been sued out, not for the legitimate purposes of a fiat in bankruptcy, but to enforce the payment of a disputed partnership debt by an ex parte proceeding, during the pendency of a suit in equity; dissent. Erskine, C. J. Ex parte Hall, re Hall, 3 Dea. 405.

A solicitor may take out a fiat, as petitioning creditor, on the amount of his bill, before it is taxed; but, if after taxation it is reduced below 1007., the fiat will be annulled. parte Ford, re Ford, 3 Dea. 494.

Ex

Semble, that where the requisite ingredients to support the fiat are suf

ficient on the face of the proceedings, and the bankrupt is furnished with copies of the depositions, and has notice that they will be read, on the hearing of his petition to annul the fiat, the bankrupt is bound to offer some evidence in contradiction of the depositions, before the respondents can be called upon for evidence to confirm them. Ibid.

(On Application of Petitioning

Creditor.)

A petitioning creditor, on finding that he has not a good debt, may petition to annul, before the expiration of the time for opening the fiat. Ex parte Rogers, 3 Mont. & A. 506.

(On Applications of Creditors.)

An order was made by the Lord Chancellor to annul a fiat,-because it was directed to other than the proper list of Commissioners, on an untrue affidavit,-without a petition, and on a statement made by the Commissioners. Re Scott, 3 Mont. & A. 723.

A. and B., joint traders, on the 25th February, execute a deed of assignment to trustees for the benefit of their creditors. On the 25th March, a separate fiat issues against A., and on the 10th August a joint fiat against A. and B. The trustees under the deed petition to annul the joint fiat, on the ground of B.'s infancy; but, it appearing that he was also an infant at the date of the trust deed-Held, that the trustees had

no locus standi; and that even if they
were legal creditors, they could not
petition to annul the joint fiat, till
they got rid of the previous separate
fiat. Ex parte Addison, re Beard, 3

Dea. 54.

Quære, Whether a joint fiat is in-
valid, because one of the parties
against whom it is issued is attainted
of felony. Ibid.

A petition by a creditor to annul
the fiat must state, not only that he
was a creditor when the fiat issued,
but that he is still a creditor. And
where a creditor delayed three years
before he made the application, the
Court would grant no indulgence to
such an informality. Ex parte San-
dall, re Clarke, 3 Dea. 275.

A. issues a fiat against a trader;
upon which B., another creditor, pro-
poses to him to abandon the fiat, and
arrange the bankrupt's affairs by a
trust deed for the equal benefit of all
the creditors; to which proposal 4.
assents, and causes the trust deed to
be prepared and tendered to B. for
his signature. B. discovers that the
deed gave A. an undue preference
over the other creditors, and issues a
second fiat.-Held, that he was justi-
fied in so doing; and a petition by
A. to annul such second fiat was dis-
missed, with costs. Ex parte Hallo-
well, re Bell, 3 Dea. 278.

Semble, that a joint fiat may be an-
nulled, as to one of the bankrupts, on
the ground of infancy, and stand
good as to the other, under the 6
Geo. 4. c. 16. s. 16. Ex parte James

[blocks in formation]

An assignee, who has a sufficient
debt to support the fiat, ought not to
petition to annul, for want of a good
petitioning creditor's debt, without
praying for a new fiat. Ex parte
Biggs, re Thomas, 3 Mont. & A. 393.

Where one of two assignees peti-
tioned to annul the fiat, on the ground
of the insufficiency of the petitioning
creditor's debt, but the other assig-
nee was willing to prosecute it; the
Court refused to annul the fiat,—as
another petitioning creditor's debt
might be substituted,-but permitted
the petitioner to be discharged from
the office of assignee, upon payment
of costs. Ex parte Booker, re Raw-
lins, 3 Dea. 232.

An assignee, who had acted for
more than two months under the fiat,
but the proof of whose debt had been
rejected by the Commissioner, applies
to annul the fiat, for want of a good
petitioning creditor's debt, contrary to
the wishes of the other assignee and
the other creditors. Held (on a peti-
tion for rehearing), that he was not in
a situation to call on the Court, for
this cause, to annul the fiat. Ibid. 346.

[graphic]

APPEAL.

Where a petition of appeal was pre-
sented to the Lord Chancellor, after
one of the judges of the Court of
Review had refused to certify a spe-
cial case, on the ground that the
question was one of fact, the petition
was dismissed, with costs. Ex parte
Woodward, re Turner, 3 Dea. 293.

After a petition for annulling the
fiat has been heard and disposed of
by the Court of Review, the Lord
Chancellor can only interfere in his
appellate, and not in his original, ju-
risdiction in bankruptcy; and an ap-
peal, to remove the order on such a
petition, must be brought before him
by way of special case, unless he
shall otherwise direct; which direc-
tion will only be given under very
special circumstances.
Ex parte
Stubbs, re Holt, 3 Dea. 549.
No appeal lies to the Lord Chan-
cellor against the settlement of a spe-
cial case by a judge of the Court of
Review, for refusing to introduce into
the case a statement of certain facts,
which the appellant contended ought
to be inserted in it; the 1 & 2 Will.
4. c. 56. s. 3. 17. confining the right
of appeal to matters of law or equity,
or the refusal or admission of evi-
dence, only; and the 3d section de-
claring, that the determination of the
judge in the settlement of the case
shall be final and conclusive. Ibid.

Lord Brougham's observations in
Ex parte Keys, 1 Mont. & A. 242;
3 Dea. & C. 275; as to the Lord
Chancellor's jurisdiction, in all matters

VOL. III.

relating to the fiat, being wholly un-
touched by the provisions of the 1 &
2 Will. 4. c. 56., corrected. Ibid.

Although the 1 & 2 Will. 4. c. 56.
s. 32. directs, that the decision of the
Court of Review, on any appeal from
the Commissioner on a question of
proof, shall be final, unless an appeal
to the Lord Chancellor is lodged
within a month,-the Court of Review,
under special circumstances, permit-
ted a case of this description to be
reheard, notwithstanding the petition
for rehearing was not presented until
six months after the former hearing.
Ex parte Jackson, re Warwick, 3 Dea.

651.

APPRENTICES.

An articled clerk to an attorney is
not an apprentice, within the meaning
of the 49th section of 6 Geo. 4. c.
16., and is therefore not entitled to a
return of a reasonable portion of the
premium, upon his master becoming
bankrupt as a scrivener. Ex parte
Prideaux, re Bush, 3 Mylne & C. 327;
S. C. 3 Mont. & A. 516, overruling
Ex parte Fussell, 2 Dea. 158.

APPROPRIATION.

A merchant abroad writes to B.,
his agent in England, a letter inclos-
ing bills, in which he says:
"the
above bills are belonging to, and on
account of, C., and I will thank you
to dispose of the sums to him."
Before the bills arrived, B. becomes
bankrupt, and the bills come to the
possession of the assignees.-Held,

3 B

« ZurückWeiter »