THE ANALYST:

OR

A DISCOURSE ADDRESSED TO AN INFIDEL MATHEMATICIAN:

WHEREIN IT IS EXAMINED

WHETHER THE OBJECT, PRINCIPLES, AND INFERENCES OF THE MODERN ANALYSIS ARE

MORE DISTINCTLY CONCEIVED, OR MORE EVIDENTLY DEDUCED, THAN RELIGIOUS MYSTERIES AND POINTS OF FAITH.

CONTENTS.

SECT. I. Mathematicians presumed to be the great masters of reason. Hence an undue deference to their decisions where they have no right to decide. This one cause of infidelity.

II. Their principles and methods to be examined with the same freedom which they assume with regard to the principles and mysteries of religion. In what sense, and how far, geometry is to be allowed an improvement of the mind. III. Fluxions the great object and employment of the profound geometricians in the present age. What these fluxions are. IV. Moments or nascent increments of flowing quantities difficult to conceive. Fluxions of different orders. Second and third fluxions obscure mysteries. V. Differences, i. e., increments or decrements infinitely small, used by foreign mathematicians instead of fluxions or velocities of nascent and evanescent increments.

VI. Differences of various orders, i. e., quantities infinitely less than quantities infinitely little; and infinitesimal parts of infinitesimals of infinitesimals, &c., without end or limit.

VII. Mysteries in faith unjustly objected against by those who admit them in

science.

VIII. Modern analysts supposed by themselves to extend their views even beyond infinity deluded by their own species or symbols.

IX. Method for finding the fluxions of a rectangle of two indeterminate quantities, shown to be illegitimate and false.

X. Implicit deference of mathematical men for the great author of fluxions. Their earnestness rather to go on fast and far, than to set out warily and see their way distinctly.

XI. Momentums difficult to comprehend. No middle quantity to be admitted
between a finite quantity and nothing, without admitting infinitesimals.
XII. The fluxion of any power of a flowing quantity. Lemma premised in order
to examine the method for finding such fluxion.

XIII. The rule for the fluxions of powers attained by unfair reasoning.
XIV. The aforesaid reasoning further unfolded, and shown to be illogical.

XV. No true conclusion to be justly drawn by direct consequence from inconsistent suppositions. The same rules of right reason to be observed, whether men argue in symbols or in words.

XVI. An hypothesis being destroyed, no consequence of such hypothesis to be

retained.

XVII. Hard to distinguish between evanescent increments and infinitesimal differences. Fluxions placed in various lights. The great author, it seems, not satisfied with his own notions.

XVIII. Quantities infinitely small supposed and rejected by Leibnitz and his followers. No quantity, according to them, greater or smaller for the addition or subduction of its infinitesimal.

XIX. Conclusions to be proved by the principles, and not principles by the con

clusions.

XX. The geometrical analyst considered as a logician; and his discoveries, not in themselves, but as derived from such principles and by such inferences.

Sect.

XXI. A tangent drawn to the parabola according to the calculus differentialis.
Truth shown to be the result of error, and how.

XXII. By virtue of a twofold mistake analysts arrive at truth, but not at science : ignorant how they come at their own conclusions.

XXIII. The conclusion never evident or accurate, in virtue of obscure or inaccurate premises. Finite quantities might be rejected as well as infinitesimals.

XXIV. The foregoing doctrine further illustrated.

XXV. Sundry observations thereupon.

XXVI. Ordinate found from the area by means of evanescent increments. XXVII. In the foregoing case, the supposed evanescent increment is really a finite quantity, destroyed by an equal quantity with an opposite sign. XXVIII. The foregoing case put generally. Algebraical expressions compared with geometrical quantities.

XXIX. Correspondent quantities algebraical and geometrical equated. The analysis shown not to obtain in infinitesimals, but it must also obtain in finite quantities.

XXX. The getting rid of quantities by the received principles, whether of fluxions or of differences, neither good geometry nor good logic. Fluxions or velocities, why introduced.

XXXI. Velocities not to be abstracted from time and space: nor their proportions to be investigated or considered exclusively of time and space.

XXXII. Difficult and obscure points constitute the principles of the modern analysis, and are the foundation on which it is built.

XXXIII. The rational faculties, whether improved by such obscure analytics. XXXIV. By what inconceivable steps finite lines are found proportional to fluxions. Mathematical infidels" strain at a gnat and swallow a camel."

XXXV, Fluxions of infinitesimals not to be avoided on the received principles. Nice abstractions and geometrical metaphysics.

XXXVI. Velocities of nascent or evanescent quantities, whether in reality understood and signified by finite lines and species?

XXXVII. Signs or exponents obvious; but fluxions themselves not so.

XXXVIII. Fluxions, whether the velocities with which infinitesimal differences are generated?

XXXIX. Fluxions of fluxions, or second fluxions, whether to be conceived as veloci

ties of velocities, or rather as velocities of the second nascent increments? XL. Fluxions considered, sometimes in one sense, sometimes in another; one while in themselves, another in their exponents: hence confusion and obscurity.

XLI. Isochronal increments, whether finite or nascent, proportional to their respective velocities.

XLII. Time supposed to be divided into moments: increments generated in those moments and velocities proportional to those increments.

XLIII. Fluxions, second, third, fourth, &c., what they are, how obtained, and how represented. What idea of velocity in a moment of time and point of space.

XLIV. Fluxions of all orders inconceivable.

XLV. Signs or exponents confounded with the fluxions.

XLVI. Series of expressions or of notes easily contrived. Whether a series of mere velocities, or of mere nascent increments corresponding thereunto, be as easily conceived?

XLVII. Celerities dismissed, and instead thereof ordinates and areas introduced. Analogies and expressions, useful in the modern quadratures, may yet be useless for enabling us to conceive fluxions. No right to apply the rules without knowledge of the principles.

XLVIII. Metaphysics of modern analysts most incomprehensible.

XLIX. Analysts employed about notional, shadowy entities. Their logics as exceptionable as their metaphysics.

L. Occasion of this address. Conclusion. Queries.

THE ANALYST.

01

I. THOUGH I am a stranger to your person, yet I am not, Sir, a stranger to the reputation you have acquired in that branch of learning which hath been your peculiar study; nor to the authority that you therefore assume in things foreign to your profession; nor to the abuse that you, and too many more of the like character, are known to make of such undue authority, to the misleading of unwary persons in matters of the highest concernment, and whereof your mathematical knowledge can by no means qualify you to be a competent judge. Equity indeed and good sense would incline one to disregard the judgment of men, in points which they have not considered or examined. But several who make the loudest claim to those qualities do nevertheless the very thing they would seem to despise, clothing themselves in the livery of other men's opinions, and putting on a general deference for the judgment of you, gentlemen, who are presumed to be of all men the greatest masters of reason, to be most conversant about distinct ideas, and never to take things upon trust, but always clearly to see your way, as men whose constant employment is the deducing truth by the justest inference from the most evident principles. With this bias on their minds, they submit to your decisions where you have no right to decide. And that this is one short way of making infidels, I am credibly informed.

II. Whereas then it is supposed, that you apprehend more distinctly, consider more closely, infer more justly, conclude more accurately than other men, and that you are therefore less religious because more judicious, I shall claim the privilege of a free-thinker; and take the liberty to inquire into the object, principles, and method of demonstration admitted by the mathematicians of the present age, with the same freedom that you presume to treat the principles and mysteries of religion; to the end that all men may see what right you have to lead, or what encouragement others have to follow you. It hath been an old remark, that geometry is an excellent logic. And it must be owned, that when the definitions are clear; when the postulata cannot be refused, nor the axioms denied; when from the dis