The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1953 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 82
Seite 38
... duty of providing safe egress from vessel over area which had to be traversed by seamen before reach- ing public street . Jones Act , 46 U.S.C.A. § 688 . 2. Seamen 29 ( 1 ) A shipowner does not have duty to in- spect and make safe dock ...
... duty of providing safe egress from vessel over area which had to be traversed by seamen before reach- ing public street . Jones Act , 46 U.S.C.A. § 688 . 2. Seamen 29 ( 1 ) A shipowner does not have duty to in- spect and make safe dock ...
Seite 39
... duty to provide safe egress from the vessel and that the duty was breached ; and ( 2 ) it was the shipowner's duty to inspect and warn the libellant of the existence of the recess in the walkway and that this duty too , was breached ...
... duty to provide safe egress from the vessel and that the duty was breached ; and ( 2 ) it was the shipowner's duty to inspect and warn the libellant of the existence of the recess in the walkway and that this duty too , was breached ...
Seite 253
... duty of a shipowner to work may be likened to the absolute duty of a landowner to keep his premises in such condition that passers - by are not in- jured , and when this duty is violated , own- er is liable to any one injured , whether ...
... duty of a shipowner to work may be likened to the absolute duty of a landowner to keep his premises in such condition that passers - by are not in- jured , and when this duty is violated , own- er is liable to any one injured , whether ...
Inhalt
Judges VII | 19 |
Court of Claims Rules XLVII | 22 |
Text of Opinions 1 | 178 |
Urheberrecht | |
1 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
action affirmed agree agreement alleged allowed amended amount appellant's appellee application Atty authority Board cause charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 205 City claim Company considered constituted contention contract corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant denied determination directed District Court duty effect employees entered entitled evidence fact Federal filed finding further granted ground held holding income injuries Internal Revenue involved issue judgment June jury L.Ed Labor lights limited matter means ment motion negligence Office operation opinion paid parties patent payment period person petition petitioner plaintiff present prior proceedings production question reason received record reference Relations respect respondent result rule S.Ct statement statute sufficient taxpayer testimony tion trial union United United States Court verdict Washington witness York