...traders. A case of that kind appears to have been brought to trial upwards of twenty years ago. It was an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange, payable to Butler and Co. and their order, and indorsed in that name. The plaintiff was so...

...in the case of Caroick -0. Vicktry, but gives no countenance to the doctrine now contended for. That was an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill payable to two persons, one of \vhom had indorsed it in the name of himself and the other before it...

...l6'9-— Selwyn Ni. Pri. 4th edit. 328. Pierson v. Hutcliinson, 2 Campb. 211. — 6 Esp. Rrp. 156. SC — This was an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange. The attorney-general, in opening the plaintiff's case, stated that he should not be able...

...the words " his proper hand being thereunto subscribed" omitted. Levy v. Wilson, 5 Esp. 180. 26. In an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange, the declaration stated that the payee indorsed it, his own proper hand being thereunto subscribed....

...the time of the bankruptcy. Thompson anc Others v. Giles and Others, Assignees, M. 4 G. 4. 422 3. In an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange ivhereof ES was the payee, the plaintiff proved that a person call ing himself £. S. came...

...— Held, that on these pleadings the defendant was entitled to begin. Faith v. M'Intyre, 44 2. In an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange alleged to be an accommodation bill, the drawer was called as a witness for the defendant....

...nor did the plaintiff acquire any right by the transfer. In Wallace v. Hardacre," « J Camp. R. which was an action by the indorsee against the acceptor °' of a bill of exchange, Lord Ellcnborough held, "thai in •15 JAXUART imnrdcr <° bar the right of the indorsee,...

...possession is evidence of ownership. See Bulkley v. Butler, 2 B. fy C. 441. 444. Mead v. Young, 4 TR 28. In an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of which ES was the payee, the plaintiff proved that a person calling himself ES came to C. having in...

...costs as between attorney and client. , Rule absolute. Feb. TOMLINS f. LAWRENCE. The Plaintiff, rPHIS was an action By the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange. Taddy Serjt. had obtained a rule, calling on the Plaintiff to shew cause why the proceedings...

...remained unrevoked at the time of the acceptance, or that he took the bill on the faith of such authority. This was an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill. The cause was tried, before Lord Tenterden, at the London Sittings before this term, when the following...