The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1932 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 80
Seite 207
... Patents 91 ( 1 ) . In suit for patent , plaintiffs , seeking priority of invention , have heavy burden to establish prior conception and reduction to practice ( 35 USCA § 63 ) . 3. Patents 91 ( 3 ) . In suit for patent , evidence held ...
... Patents 91 ( 1 ) . In suit for patent , plaintiffs , seeking priority of invention , have heavy burden to establish prior conception and reduction to practice ( 35 USCA § 63 ) . 3. Patents 91 ( 3 ) . In suit for patent , evidence held ...
Seite 682
In re HORTON . Patent Appeal No. 2933 . Court of Customs and Patent Appeals . May 23 , 1932 . 1. Patents 97 . Rule promulgated by Commissioner of Patents pursuant to statutory authority , if reasonable and within scope of power con ...
In re HORTON . Patent Appeal No. 2933 . Court of Customs and Patent Appeals . May 23 , 1932 . 1. Patents 97 . Rule promulgated by Commissioner of Patents pursuant to statutory authority , if reasonable and within scope of power con ...
Seite 1058
... Patents 113 ( 6 ) . Rule authorizing affidavits to swear back of anticipating patent held inapplicable where patentee expressly made claim for sim- ilar product ( Patent Office Rule 75 ) . 3. Patents ~ 106 ( 2 ) . Applicant cannot ...
... Patents 113 ( 6 ) . Rule authorizing affidavits to swear back of anticipating patent held inapplicable where patentee expressly made claim for sim- ilar product ( Patent Office Rule 75 ) . 3. Patents ~ 106 ( 2 ) . Applicant cannot ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
26 USCA action affirmed alleged amount appellant appellee application bank bankrupt bankruptcy bill Board of Tax bond capital cent charged Circuit Court Circuit Judge City city of Marion commission Commissioner of Internal contract corporation cost counsel Court of Appeals Daniel Boone decision deductions defendant deposit depreciation depreciation reserve determined District Court District Judge Dubiske entitled evidence excess profits tax execution fact filed held historic cost income insured Internal Revenue invested issue judgment jurisdiction jury levy loss lumber ment motion Motors Acceptance Corporation National Prohibition Act paid pany patent payment petition petitioner plaintiff preferred stock prior art proceeding purchase question reason received Revenue Act secure Stat statute subrogation suit supra surety taxable taxpayer testimony thereof tion trade-mark trial trust United States C. C. A. York York City