The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1962 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 76
Seite 481
... prior use of its mark but prior use thereof for goods relat- ed in some manner to those of ap- plicant as to be likely to result in purchasers ascribing a common ori- gin thereto . * * * " The only evidence offered by op- poser in this ...
... prior use of its mark but prior use thereof for goods relat- ed in some manner to those of ap- plicant as to be likely to result in purchasers ascribing a common ori- gin thereto . * * * " The only evidence offered by op- poser in this ...
Seite 750
... prior to the date of his applica- tion for a patent in the United States . Appellees contend , and the district court held , that because appellant's sec- ond patent referred ( specifically ) only to his first patent , the earliest date ...
... prior to the date of his applica- tion for a patent in the United States . Appellees contend , and the district court held , that because appellant's sec- ond patent referred ( specifically ) only to his first patent , the earliest date ...
Seite 751
... prior case law , " The third requirement of the statute is that the second application must contain a specific reference to the first applica- tion . In view of this requirement the right to rely upon a prior application may be waived ...
... prior case law , " The third requirement of the statute is that the second application must contain a specific reference to the first applica- tion . In view of this requirement the right to rely upon a prior application may be waived ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
action affirmed agreement alleged amended amount appellee application authority basis Board cause certificates charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 305 City claim Company conclusion considered contract corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant denied determination directors District Court effect employees evidence fact Federal filed further Government ground Heekin held hold income indicated interest Internal Internal Revenue Code involved issue judgment June jury L.Ed Labor land liability limited material matter means ment motion operation opinion parties patent payment period person plaintiff plant present prior prison proceedings profits purchaser question reason received record referred Relations respect result rule S.Ct Service shares Smith statute suit supra testimony tion Tort tract trial Union United witness York