Reports of Patent Causes: Decided in the Circuit Courts of the United States Since January 1, 1874, Band 1L.K. Strouse & Company, 1881 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-5 von 84
Seite 6
... brought thereon by the plaintiff against Charles F. Jacobsen and Charles E. Mabie , on a motion for a preliminary injunction . The decision I arrived at was , that the case on the part of the plaintiff was not so en- tirely free from ...
... brought thereon by the plaintiff against Charles F. Jacobsen and Charles E. Mabie , on a motion for a preliminary injunction . The decision I arrived at was , that the case on the part of the plaintiff was not so en- tirely free from ...
Seite 7
... brought by the plaintiff , was also pending . The two suits were commenced in May , 1870. The injunction continued in force , and , in November , 1872 , the suit at law was tried . On that trial , on the question of novelty , patents ...
... brought by the plaintiff , was also pending . The two suits were commenced in May , 1870. The injunction continued in force , and , in November , 1872 , the suit at law was tried . On that trial , on the question of novelty , patents ...
Seite 14
... brought by Wyberd , in this Court , in 1861 , on his reflector patent ; that one was an action at law against the plaintiff , which was tried before Mr. Justice Nelson and a jury , in the fall of 1863 ; that the charge was that ...
... brought by Wyberd , in this Court , in 1861 , on his reflector patent ; that one was an action at law against the plaintiff , which was tried before Mr. Justice Nelson and a jury , in the fall of 1863 ; that the charge was that ...
Seite 22
... brought therein on the plaintiff's patents , for the purpose of satisfying myself that I have allowed no point to escape my notice . As against the prior patents referred to , the strength imparted to the plaintiff's patents , by the ...
... brought therein on the plaintiff's patents , for the purpose of satisfying myself that I have allowed no point to escape my notice . As against the prior patents referred to , the strength imparted to the plaintiff's patents , by the ...
Seite 23
... brought as to such invention . I have said nothing more as to the alleged prior invention of Doyle , because , although it was referred to , it was not pressed on this motion , and I now allude to it only as a part of the history of the ...
... brought as to such invention . I have said nothing more as to the alleged prior invention of Doyle , because , although it was referred to , it was not pressed on this motion , and I now allude to it only as a part of the history of the ...
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
action alleged allowed answer apparatus appears application arrangement assignment attached bill bottom cause chamber charge claim combination Company complainant complainant's connected consists construction containing corset court covered decree defendants described desired device direction District drawings edge effect equity evidence examined fabric fact filed fluting follows frame give given glass granted ground held improvement infringement injunction invention inventor issued joint known letters patent license machine manner manufacture March material matter means mechanism ment metallic mode motion necessary object oils operation original parties passed persons placed plaintiffs plate portion present prior produced profits proof question reason reference reflector regard reissued result rubber says secured separate shown side specification spring substantially sufficient suit surface sustained teeth testimony thing tion truck United whole
Beliebte Passagen
Seite 228 - But the results must be a product of the combination, and not a mere aggregate of several results each the complete product of one of the combined elements. Combined results are not necessarily a novel result, nor are they an old result obtained in a new and improved manner. Merely bringing old devices into juxtaposition, and there allowing each to work out its own effect without the production of something novel, is not invention.
Seite 93 - ... to the full end of the term for which said letters patent are or may be granted, as fully and entirely as the same would have been held and enjoyed by me had this assignment and sale not been made.
Seite 501 - This provision of the Act of 1836 was in turn superseded by § 53 of the Act of July 8th, 1870, c. 230, 16 Stat. 205, which provided, " that whenever any patent is inoperative or invalid, by reason of a defective or insufficient specification, or by reason of the patentee claiming as his own invention or discovery more than he had a right to claim as new...
Seite 507 - Office a written description of the same, and of the manner and process of making, constructing, compounding, and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same...
Seite 143 - Any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvements thereof, not known or used by others in this country, before his invention or discovery thereof...
Seite 568 - ... to enforce obedience to such order by the same process as if he were a party to the cause...
Seite 114 - ... or more than two years prior to his application, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years...
Seite 235 - But I claim the combination of the lead and India-rubber, or other erasing substance, in the holder of a drawing pencil, the whole being constructed and arranged substantially in the manner and for the purpose set forth.
Seite 550 - States, in default of which it shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee for a valuable consideration, without notice, whose assignment has been duly recorded.
Seite 32 - ... in controversy were issued without authority of law, and therefore void ; that in view of the state of the art at the date of the alleged improvements of Wright, the letters patent granted to him did not exhibit any patentable invention, and for that reason are invalid ; that the defendants were not engaged in the manufacture of cultivators, but have Opinion of the Court.