 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1865 - 722 Seiten
...case within the general rule of exemption, that the servants — the one that suffers and the one that causes the injury — should be at the time engaged in the same operation or particular work. It is Slattery's Adm'r and Others v. The Toledo and Wabash Railroad.... | |
 | 1888 - 556 Seiten
...fellow-servants, the employees need not be at the same time engaged in the same particular work. It is sufficient if they are in the employment of the same master,...in the same common work, and performing duties and servive* for the same general purpose. The rule is the same, although the one injured may be inferior... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 738 Seiten
...servants — the one that suffers Argument fur the administratrix of the party injured. and the one that causes the injury — should be at the time engaged in the same operation or particular work. It is enough that they are in the employment of the same master, engaged... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1876 - 854 Seiten
...control and directions of the superior whose act or omission has caused the injury, the rule Is the same. Nor is it necessary, to exempt the master from liability,...causes the Injury should be at the time engaged in tha same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common... | |
 | 1905 - 1120 Seiten
...operation or particular work ; that It is enough to bring the case within the general rule of exemption if they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes ; or, in... | |
 | 1906 - 1122 Seiten
...same operation or particular work. It is enough to bring the case within the general rule of exemption if they are In the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes, or, in... | |
 | 1905 - 1104 Seiten
...same operation or particular work. It is enough to bring the case within the general rule of exemption If they are In the employment of the same master, engaged In the Bame common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes... | |
 | 1905 - 1174 Seiten
...operation or particular work. It is enough, to bring the case within the general rule of exemption, if they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes, or, in... | |
 | 1905 - 1204 Seiten
...injury — should be at the time engaged in the same operation or particular work. It is enough that they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties and services tending to accomplish the same general purposes... | |
 | 1885 - 1102 Seiten
...track, is a fellow-servant with the brakeman. See, 2 Am. <fc Eug. R. Cas. , 94, and cases cited. Persons in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, are fellow-servants, however their grades may differ. Wright v. NTCRR Co., 25 N. Y., 565.... | |
| |
... if they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes, or, in other words, if the services of each in his particular sphere or department... 
