Theaters of Intention: Drama and the Law in Early Modern England
Stanford University Press, 2000 - 362 Seiten
Early modern Britain witnessed a transformation in legal reasoning about human volition and intentional action, which contributed to new conventions and techniques for the theatrical representation of premeditated conduct. Theaters of Intention examines the relation between law and theater in this period, reading plays by Shakespeare, Jonson, Marlowe, and others to demonstrate how legal understanding of willful human action pervades sixteenth- and seventeenth-century English drama.
Drawing on case law, legal treatises, parliamentary journals, and theatrical account books, the author considers the interplay between theatrical deliberation and legal dramatization of human intention. He analyzes such canonical plays as Hamlet, Timon of Athens, Dr. Faustus, Bartholomew Fair, and Othello alongside less familiar texts, including Barnes's The Devil's Charter, Jonson's Entertainment at Althorp, and the anonymous Nobody and Somebody.
Notable instances of the new theatrical representation of premeditated conduct include the appearance in Hamlet of wording from the sensational case of Hales versus Petit and dramatizations of contract law in enactments of demonic pacts in the plays of Marlowe and Barnes. The final chapter examines the iconography of Nobody, an early modern equivalent of John Doe, and features some dozen illustrations of contemporary woodcuts, drawings, and engravings.
Tied closely to the convergence of authorial and dramatic forethought, theatrical representation of premeditated action demonstrates the close relationships among purposeful human behavior, fictionality, economic exchange, and the experience of time.
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
according action actors agency agent agreement already appears argues associated assumpsit attempt audience authority Bartholomew becomes body calls cause Chapter character claim close Cokes common conceptual concern context contract course death devil direction discussion distinction early modern economic effect English example exchange fact Fair Faustus fiction figure follows gift give Hamlet Henslowe human identity imagined implies important intention interest involved John Jonson kill kind king language later least less lines linked logic material matter means mind murder Nemo object offer once original particular performance person play poison possible practice precisely present produce promise question reason reference reflected relation relationship remains remarks representation represented response result rhetorical scene seems sense Shakespeare shows similar social space specifically stage structure suggests temporal theater theatrical thing thinking tion tradition true turn