Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

THE

JOURNAL AND RECORD

OF

THE LAW AND THE LAWYERS.

FROM MAY TO OCTOBER 1872.

VOLUME LIII.

LONDON:
PUBLISHED AT THE OFFICE OF THE LAW TIMES,

WELLINGTON STREET, STRAND, W.C.

1872.

(11.4 FEB 1962

KLBRARY

LONDON: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY HORACE COX, AT THE "LAW TIMES” OFFICE, WELLINGTON-STREET, STRAND.

[graphic]

Longinotto v. Morgs, 176

Preston v. The Corporation of Great Yarmouth, Somerville, ex parte; re Fitze, 105
Long v. Williams, 159

156

Stanley of Alderley's (Lord) 'Estates, re, 118
Proctor v. Glegg, 157

Stanton v. Richardson , Richardson v. Stanton, 120
Macdonald v. Macdonald, 9

Progress Assurance Company ; re The (Tobin's Starr v. Trinder, 104
Macfarlane v. Rolt, 196

case), 8

Steel v. Branner, 11
Mack v. Petter, 235

Provision Merchants Company (Limited), re The, Stephenson v. Strutt, 119
Marshall v. Hale, 175

84

Stockley v. Shopland, 85
Martineau v. Kitchen, 28
Pryor v. Pryor, 156

Stooke v. Stooke, 100
Martin v. Hobson, 256

Stott v. Fladgate, 159
McCarthy v. Metropolitan Board of Works, 104 Queen, The, v. Morgan, 84

Swarbrick v. Learoyd, 175
McKewan v. George Sanderson, 29

Queen, The, v. The Registrar of Friendly Societies,
Meinertzhagen v. Walters, 215'

119

Taubman v. The Pacific Steam Navigation Co., 11
Mercer v. Graves, 10

Taylor's Settled Estates, re, 236
Mercers' Company, The, v. The Metropolitan | Rainy v. Ellis, 26, 254

Teignmouth and General Mutual Shipping As.
Board of Works, 8
Rajah, The, 217

surance Association, re the; Martin's Claim, 9
Merry v. Nickalls, 255
Reg. v. Armitage and Beaumont, 197

Thomas v. Caddick, 7
Metropolitan Public Carriage and Repository Reg. v. Aylesford Union, 10

Thomas v. Howell and others, 256
Company (Limited),re The ; ex parte Cleland, 196 Reg. v. Mussett, 10

Thompson v. Cohen, 45
Meyricke Fund, re The, 80
Reg. v. Strachan, 27

Thompson's Trusts, re, 236
Mildmay and others (app.) v. The Parish of Reg. v. The Justices of Middlesex, 102

Thorne's Settled Estates, re, 8
Wimbledon (resps.), 103
Reg. v. The Mayor of London, 102

Tichborne v. Mostyn, 30
Millner's Estate, re, 176

Reg. v. The Vice-Chancellor and the Hebdomadal Tichborne v. Tichborne, 119
Monsell v. Armstrong, 216

Council of the University of Oxford, 28

Tomline v. Lowe, 119
Morgan v. Steble and another, 197

Republic of Peru, The v. Weguelin and others, 104 Torrance v. Bolton, 83
Morris v. Morris, 196
Revell v. Blake, 30

Towerson r. The Aspatria Agricultural Co-opera-
Moss v. The Mersey Docks and Harbour Com. Ridge's Trusts, Re, 195

tive Society (Limited), 159
pany, 9
Ring v. Jarman, 255

Towgood, In the Goods of, 137
Motion v. Moojen, 158

Roberts v. Crowe, 121
Moufflet v. Cole, 160

Robey and Coi's Perseverance Iron Works Varley v. Coppard, 103
Munt v. Glynes, 175

(Limited) v. Ollier, 234

Venn v. Cattell, 255
Ross (app.) v. Fedden and another (resps.), 119 Vyse v. Foster 83
Narroway v. Beattie, 26
Nettle's Charity; re, 255
Savage's Trusts, Re, 257

Waite v. Littlewood, 175.
Newell v. Newell, 82

Scales v. London and South-Western Railway Wakeham, In the Goods of, 31
Norris (app.) v. Barnes (resp.), 27

Company, 44

Ward v. Lawson, 157
Scarlet, In the goods of, 236

Ward's Trusts ; re, 255
Orchard v. Lake, 101.
Scott v. Maxwell, 157

Watkins v. Davies, 104
Seymour v. London and Provincial Marine Insur. Wells v. Abrahams, 28
Pappa v. Rose, 137

ance Company, 104

Wells, ex parte, re Ash, 13
Pegge v. Guardians of Lampeter Union, 136 Seymour v. Saunders, 121

Wells v. White, 63
Peninsular Company v. Fleming, 198
Shacklock v. Jarvis, 26

Whitechurch and Others v. East London Railway
Peplow v. Seabrook, 80

Sheffield Waterworks Company v. Bennett, 171 Company, 11, 160
Peyton v. Cox, 83

Simpkin (app.) v. The Justices of Birmingham Wigg v. Nicholls, 83
Phillips v. Foxall, 197

(resps.), 10

Wilcox v. Gotfrey, 28
Phillips v. Routh, 30
Simpson v. Ingleby, 235

Wilkinson v. Barber, 101 .
Phillipson v. Turner, 26
Skinner (app.) v. Usher (resp.), 27

Williams's Settled Estates; re The Leases and
Pickering v. Stephenson, 27
Smith v. Adkins, 82

Sales of Settled Estates Act, 196
Planet Benefit Building and Investment Society; Smith ex parte ; re Angerstein, 195

Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators,
re The, 256
Smith v. Darby, 102

The v. Coles and Others, 84
Pooley, ex parte, re Sir William Russell, 100 Smith v. Fletcher and others, 159

Winch v. The Conservators of the Thames, 198
Powell v. Smith, 8
Smith's Trust, re, 101

Woodbridge v. Hoare, 157
Power v. Wigmore, 104
Snowball, ex parte; re Douglas, 100

Wulff v. Jay, 103

[graphic]
« ZurückWeiter »