 | United States. Patent Office - 1884 - 580 Seiten
...right of selection: No one can clnim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-name or trade-mark •which would practically give him a monopoly in...goods other than those produced or made by himself. * * * Nor can a Runeric name, or a name merely descriptive of an article of trade, of its qualities,... | |
 | Charles Sidney Whitman - 1875 - 814 Seiten
...is applied. Ibid. 7. No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade mark or trade name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods otlier than those produced or made by himself. If he could, the public would be injured rather than... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1877 - 678 Seiten
...have become such by association. No oue can claim protection for the exclusive use of a tnule-mark or trade-name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any gooda other than those produced or made by himself. A generic name, or a name merely descriptive of... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1879 - 530 Seiten
...mark were allowed: No one en 11 claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark or trade-mime which would practically give him a monopoly in the...the public would be injured rather than protected, lor competition would be destroyed. Nor can a generic name, or a name merely descriptive of an article... | |
 | 1879 - 550 Seiten
...to be over, looked. No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade mark or trade name which would practically give him a monopoly in the...himself. If he could, the public would be injured mther than protected, for competition would be destroyed. Nor can a generic name, or a name merely... | |
 | 1881 - 1900 Seiten
...of Canal Co. v. Clark, 13 Wall. 1. There the court said, speakin? through Mr. Justice Strong, that no one can claim protection for the exclusive use...of any goods other than those produced or made by him&lf. If he could, the public would be injured rather than protected, for competition would be destroyed.... | |
 | David Hall Rice, Lepine Cooper Rice - 1880 - 508 Seiten
...trade mark. Ibid. 88. No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade mark or a trade name which would practically give him a monopoly in the...goods other than those produced or made by himself. Ibid. 89. "For Family Use," when applied to an article, indicates as plainly as words can the use for... | |
 | 1896 - 2118 Seiten
...thus presented by Mr. Justice Strong, speaking for the court: "No one can claim protection for tlie exclusive use of a trade-mark or tradename which would practically give him a monopoly in the wile of any goods other than those produced or made by himself. If he could, the public wnuld be injured,... | |
 | 1925 - 1112 Seiten
...afford no protection to either against the sale of a spurious in place of the genuine article. * * * No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark • • • which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those produced... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 962 Seiten
...protection for the exclusive use of a mark which Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Lowell Hosiery Mills. would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those of his own manufacture. See also, Oilman v. Hunnewell, 122 Mass. 139. Letters and figures, when used... | |
| |
No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark or trade-name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those produced or made by himself. 
