Mr. Justice Bayley. It is not necessary to decide whether the act 4 Geo. 4. c. 34. does apply to persons employed in the silk trade, although it may be material to observe, that, before that act passed, there were certain acts in force applicable to persons engaged in that trade, and providing for the determination of disputes between masters and workmen (21). Now the act 4 G. 4. c. 34. is entitled "An act to enlarge the powers of justices in determining complaints between masters and servants, and between masters, apprentices, artificers, and others," and it recites two former acts, 20 Geo. 2. c. 19, and 6 Geo. 3. c. 25, and another act, 4 Geo. 4. c. 29, applicable only to cases of apprenticeship, and declares that it is expedient to extend the powers of "the said acts." The 20 Geo. 2. c. 19. contains the same general description of individuals as is contained in this act, except that the words "labourer or other person," are substituted for "other labourers." The words "labourers and others," however, had been introduced in the act, 6 Geo. 3. c. 25. s. 4, and are obviously equivalent to those employed in the present statute, and therefore it should seem that those expressions do not give the power contended for, if the construction of the words "the said act," is to confine the enlarged authority to cases only within those acts. Without now giving any opinion on that question, let us see whether this conviction or commitment comes within the act of parliament. The third section enacts, "that if any servant in husbandry, or any artificer, calico-printer, handicraftsman, miner, collier, keelman, (21) By 10 Geo. 4. c. 52, the provisions of 4 Geo. 4. c. 34. are extended to all persons engaged, whether as masters, servants, apprentices, or otherwise, in the several manufactures, trades, and occupations mentioned in 17 Geo. 3. c. 56. pitman, glassman, potter, labourer, or other person, shall contract with any person or persons whomsoever to serve him, her or them, for any time or times whatsoever, or in any other manner, and shall not enter into his or her service according to his or her contract (such contract being in writing and signed by the contracting parties), or, having entered into such service, shall absent himself or herself from his or her service, before the term of his or her contract, whether such contract shall be in writing or not in writing, shall be completed, or neglect to fulfil the same, or be guilty of any other misconduct or misdemeanor in the execution thereof," then it shall be lawful for the Justice to commit the offender to the house of correction, &c. Looking, then, at the title of the act, and at this clause, it is clear to me that the party, to come within its enactments, must not only be a person within the descriptions enumerated, but must also have contracted to serve, or have entered the complainant's service. But there is a plain distinction between a contract to receive and to act as a servant, and a contract between individuals that, for a sum certain, specified work shall be done. A man might contract with many different persons to do work for all, and by so doing would not properly be brought within the meaning of this act, and could not be said to have contracted to serve each; for where a party is a servant, he is so exclusively to one master. On looking further at the conviction and commitment, we find it does not appear that the party, within the words of the act, contracted to serve for any time, nor does the evidence state what the contract was, but merely says what was the usual practice of the weavers employed by the complainant. That, however, would not be conclusive on all the weavers, as the obligations of each would depend on his engagement. Mr. Justice Littledale.-I am also of opinion, that this case is not within the 6 G. 4. c. 34. In order to become liable to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate under this act, the party must be in the service of the master at the time of the complaint, or he must have made a contract in writing to enter that service. On the face of this commitment, there is nothing like a service or a contract to serve. I also think, that the case is not within 17 Geo. 3. As to the contemplation of the relation of master and servant, there is nothing to contradict the supposition that the party convicted was a person only casually employed as a weaver. The commitment therefore is bad in every point of view. Mr. Justice Parke.-The service contemplated by the act, is a service for a definite time, or till some particular thing is done. From this conviction, it might even be inferred that the party had not wove the silk at the prices agreed upon, and that this was the subject of complaint. The commitment therefore is not supported by the conviction. It does not appear that the party was in Hall's service for this particular purpose, and he may have been in his employ for a service of a totally dissimilar description. Rule absolute to enter a verdict for the plaintiff. INDEX ΤΟ THE SUBJECTS OF THE CASES REPORTED IN VOL. VII. Subscribers are requested to bear in mind that this Index is intended only for temporary use, and CHANCERY. Abatement-Rules for, between Annuitants and Le- A large demand established after more than Accruer and Survivorship-Construction of bequest Advowson. See Charitable Use. the hands of, for payment of officers, and not de- right to relief, the amount due to him was ascer- Bankers-entitled to compound interest and to half- Such questions being put generally with others, B having two bills of exchange accepted by A, bill, and proceed at law against A for the other, Who servants within that act, s. 48,-78 · Debt claimed-dividend declared-and as- Machinery of iron works mortgaged-how far Assignees, and not petitioning creditors, liable Supersedeas as to one, the commission being See Bankrupt. Contingent Debt. Declaration of Bill of Discovery exposing to penalties. See See Discovery. Bill of Review-General rules as to, when and for Cestui que trust As to dealings with, by his trustee, 6 A See Visitatorial Power of the Crown. See Compensation-None as between devisees of a luna- Party, unsuccessfully attempting to set it Construction. See Covenant. Contingent Debt-at the date of a commission issued Coroner-What a sufficient residence within the Corpus of a Fund-Effect of limitation for wife's separate use for life-as to the corpus of a fund to Costs. See Compromise. Demurrer. Covenant-Construction of, in a marriage settle- ment, as extending to give parties claiming to be Construction of, that one child should be en- Covenant to surrender Copyholds-Effect of, as re- Declarations-made by a testatrix to her solicitor at Declaration of Trust-of leaseholds-bankrupt trus- Demurrer for want of Parties-A suit cannot be in- allowed to amended bill-suit out of court- Devise--construction of. See First Son. between will and deed of appointment-case Equitable Waste-where estate, settled in a course Estates Tail-by implication. See Construction of Evidence. See Declarations. Examination of a party may be read on further Executory Devise over-when to take effect, 182 Farm Modus-Mode of Pleading, 106 Foreign Governments not recognized by the King of Bill of Discovery, in aid of an action to recover Upon demurrer, the Court's competency of its Forfeiture. See Life Estate. Forgery-Non-prosecution for-proof of amount of stock sold under a forged power against the estate Fraud. See Bill of Discovery. Releases fraudulently obtained. Furniture what included under the description of, Grandchildren. Term grandchildren in a will ex- Inquiry on Further Directions. See Examination. |