 | United States - 2000 - 1208 Seiten
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1952 - 170 Seiten
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 ~of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1956 - 444 Seiten
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1956 - 536 Seiten
...disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title [the prior art], if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 1662 Seiten
...decisions of the courts and in writings. Section 103 states this requirement in the title. It refers to the difference between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art, meaning what was known before as described in section 102. If this difference is such that the subject... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1960 - 1034 Seiten
...reason that, even though an invention is "new and useful" it is not patentable "if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
 | United States. Department of the Army - 1961 - 346 Seiten
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1961 - 1442 Seiten
...invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1961 - 1928 Seiten
...the present statute, 35 USC 103, for convincing J the Commissioner of Patents that the— differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art I are such that the subject matter as a whole would not have been obvious at tin time the invention... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1962 - 938 Seiten
...invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill... | |
| |
A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter... 
