Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of LanguagesPeter Forster, Colin Renfrew McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2006 - 198 Seiten Evolutionary ('phylogenetic') trees were first used to infer lost histories nearly two centuries ago by manuscript scholars reconstructing original texts. Today, computer methods are enabling phylogenetic trees to transform genetics, historical linguistics and even the archaeological study of artefact shapes and styles. But which phylogenetic methods are best suited to retracing the evolution of languages? And which types of language data are most informative about deep prehistory? In this book, leading specialists engage with these key questions. Essential reading for linguists, geneticists and archaeologists, these studies demonstrate how phylogenetic tools are illuminating previously intractable questions about language prehistory. This innovative volume arose from a conference of linguists, geneticists and archaeologists held at Cambridge in 2004. |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 43
Seite 46
... proposed for a number of groups within Bantu ( see e.g. Doke 1954 ; Nurse 1999 ; 2001 , Bastin et al . 2003 ; CBOLD 2004 ) . A second approach to the internal classifica- tion of Bantu is to abandon the comparative method altogether ...
... proposed for a number of groups within Bantu ( see e.g. Doke 1954 ; Nurse 1999 ; 2001 , Bastin et al . 2003 ; CBOLD 2004 ) . A second approach to the internal classifica- tion of Bantu is to abandon the comparative method altogether ...
Seite 51
... proposed by Guthrie ( 1967-71 ) , so that , in order to assess similarities and differences between this classification , and the one proposed in Holden's tree , one thus can fairly easily check whether Holden's groupings correspond to ...
... proposed by Guthrie ( 1967-71 ) , so that , in order to assess similarities and differences between this classification , and the one proposed in Holden's tree , one thus can fairly easily check whether Holden's groupings correspond to ...
Seite 52
... propose an analysis where Southwest Bantu is closer to East than to West Bantu . Some smaller points in Holden's study are inter- esting in that they correlate with revisions proposed to Guthrie's classification as reported in Bastin et ...
... propose an analysis where Southwest Bantu is closer to East than to West Bantu . Some smaller points in Holden's study are inter- esting in that they correlate with revisions proposed to Guthrie's classification as reported in Bastin et ...
Inhalt
CLARE J HOLDEN RUSSELL D GRAY | 19 |
Bantu Classification Bantu Trees and Phylogenetic Methods | 43 |
Chapter 6 | 67 |
Urheberrecht | |
11 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
Albanian algorithms Anatolian Archaeological assumptions Bantu languages Bantu trees Bastin Bayesian binary Biology borrowing branch lengths Cambridge Chapter clade cladistics classification coded cognate cognate class cognate sets comparative computational correspondences data set data-cognate dating dialects distribution divergence Dyen East Bantu edge English estimates evidence evolutionary example Figure Forster genetic Germanic glottochronology Gray & Atkinson Greek guages Historical Linguistics Hittite Holden homoplasy Indo-European languages Indo-Iranian inference innovations islands language data language evolution language family lexical evolution lexical replacement lexicostatistics likelihood Malagasy Markov matrix maximum parsimony McDonald Institute McMahon meaning Molecular morphological Mycenaean Neighbor-Net Nichols nodes Pagel parameters phonetic phonological characters phylogenetic methods phylogenetic trees phylogeny posterior probability probability problem Proto-Indo-European rates of lexical reconstruction relationships Renfrew reticulations root semantic slot similar split splits graph statistical subgroup Swadesh Swadesh list telic tion Tocharian verbs vocabulary Warnow word lists zone