before us. It is as useful to give a cursory glance at this imaginary world, as it is actually to mingle with mankind in their public assemblages, or in the more refined circles. Human nature has been well sifted since the days of Fielding. He is the Shakspeare of prose. Since his bold sketches, writers have drawn more from nature than from the imagination exclusively, as formerly. It is certainly true also, that the more keenly we scan our fellow beings, the more minute do the complicated folds of their different temperaments appear. Aristotle's system of a world within a world is more true of the inward than outward nature. Enough is created; imagination need only embellish. Time is not mis-spent in perusing our best novels. We know it is the opinion of some, that when they have Shakspeare and Fielding, Milton, Johnson, &c., before them, they have enough for a life. True, here are mines of thought, but they are susceptible of numberless ramifications. D'Israeli, in his "Curiosities of Literature," gives us a chapter upon "Imitations," which shows how much an idea may be heightened, and how gradual is its approach to perfection. In observing how often the thoughts of others have been imbibed, unconsciously improved and re-produced by some of the greatest minds the world has ever known, we are led to believe that there is, strictly speaking nothing new under the sun. In modern days, a man of talent, is a sort of mental alchymist, and we rejoice to say, that greater success has attended the transmutation of heavy suggestions into current truths, than ever crowned the efforts of the ancient searchers for the philosopher's stone. We do not approve of too much reading. Literature should be absorbed by the mind, exactly as water is taken up by a sponge; itself unseen, save as it increases the bulk of the original material. But to pack down the thoughts of others just as we would pack down a jar of sweetmeats, is absurd in the extreme. When the taste is once formed, then reading may be desultory. Let the compass of the mind be first extended by our acquaintanee with the solid writers, and then, every thing else will be like tributary streams, which swell the original current, while their own tiny natures are lost in its depths. Desultory reading is advantageous, because we are thus led to comprehend the full extent of our own powers. We are often in the beginning, attracted towards our best friends by a casual but happy remark. Thus may the imperfect supposition of others touch a train of thought, which afterwards embodies new and important discoveries. The mind, like the bell, is struck ere it can sound; but the various vibrations, whether they be strong or weak, belong intrinsically to the metal of which it is composed. PRIZE POEM. BY SARAH H. WHITMAN. Spoken at the opening of the Shakspeare Hall, Providence, HIST! what strange influence hovers in the air? A roseate light illumes the storied wall, And youth and beauty throng the lofty hall; Can we forget when first, in childhood's hour, Bright, breathing, palpable! scarce could we deem That earth confessed such beauty-to abide But tho' less genial prove our western clime, Once more we bid thee welcome to our shores, Again we haunt thy courts, throng round thy shrine, Oft when the wint'ry storms shall hurtle round, Here shall we sit in this enchanted hall, While "breathing thoughts and burning words" enthral,— Regardless of the cold world's sordid strife, And all the hollow mimicries of life Where vainer actors idler pageants play, And wear their masks in the broad eye of day. Oft shall young beauty to this shrine repair, In varying strains of triumph or of woe Now decked in smiles, and now her brow o'er fraught With the pale cast of melancholy thought. Far thro' the twilight vistas of the past, Each old romantic region hath she traced, Where knightly forms heroic conflicts wage, The plume, the penon, and the blazon'd shield— |