Censorship in Canadian Literature
McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP, 2001 - 205 Seiten
Cohen critiques Timothy Findley's broad anti-censorship position; he traces Margaret Atwood's evolution from implicit support for the censorship of pornography in Bodily Harm to the rejection of censorship in The Handmaid's Tale; and he provides the first detailed study of the draft of Margaret Laurence's unfinished novel, showing the degree to which her final silence was a result of her censorship ordeal. Finally, an analysis of the writing of Beatrice Culleton and Marlene Nourbese Philip shows how different kinds of socio-cultural censorship - from gate-keepers to self-censorship - silence Native and black Canadian voices. Cohen's re-definition of censorship as essentially a practice of judgment takes us beyond the traditional Enlightenment delineation of censorship as an oppressive government practice and the consequent neutralist liberal condemnation of censorship on principle. Since judgment is enmeshed in the fabric of human endeavour, censorship is inevitable; since censorship is inevitable, Cohen concludes, debate over whether censorship itself is desirable should give way to a search for censorship practices that are more just. Censorship in Canadian Literature is an essential text for scholars of Canadian literature as well as for anyone concerned with contemporary debates about censorship and civil rights.
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Towards a More Just Judgment
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Allie appears appropriation argues argument artists attack attempt Atwood audience banned becomes begins believe Black Bodily Harm body calls Canada Canadian censor censorship character considered context controversy course critics cultural definition depiction discourse discussion Diviners Draft effect English evil example expression fact feel feminists Findley Findley's forces free speech freedom Gilead groups Handmaid's Tale hands Harm ideas important involving issue judgment kind language Laurence Laurence's letter liberal literature Margaret material means Native nature never novel passage Philip political pornography position practice present principle producers publishers question quoted reading reasons refers Rennie response result rhetoric Robert says scene self-censorship sense sexual ship social society story suggests suppression takes things thought truth turn values violence voice women writing