...been used in France and England before the patent was taken out. Mr. Justice Washington instructed the jury that to entitle the plaintiff to recover...the United States, but to other parts of the world. Even if there was no proof that the plaintiff knew that the discovery had been made before, still he...

...the original inventor. Dawson v. Folien, 2 Washington's CC Rep. 311. Washington, J., in this case, informed the jury, that to entitle the plaintiff to...had before been made, still he could not recover, if m truth he was not cation of them be new, if the combination in its nature be infringement essentially...

...Works Mannf. Co. 4 Fish. 591 ; sc 3 Biss. 77. In order to entitle a person to a patent, he must be the original inventor, not only in relation to the United States, but to other parts of the world. Sewall c. Jones, 91 US 171 ; sc 9 OG 47 ; sc 6 Fish. 343 ; sc 3 OG 630 ; sc 3 Cliff. 563. If an inventor...

...in our judicial tribunals." As то PATENTABILITY.— NOVELTY.— The applicant for patent must be the original inventor, not only in relation to the United States, but to other parts of the world, see Dawson p. Folien, 2 Wash. 311, and this is so even although he had no knowledge of the previous...

...proposition in patent law that, to entitle- a plaintiff to recover for the violation of a patent, he must be the original inventor, not only in relation to the United States, but to other parts of the world. Even if the plaintiff did not know that the discovery had been made before, still he cannot recover...

...same time with the one having the shortest time to run. To recover for infringement plnintiff must be the original inventor, not only in relation to the United States, but to other parts of the world. Sewall vs. Jones, 91 US, 171. Patents are granted for invention, not for discover)r, unless discovery...