 | 1755 - 478 Seiten
...Denominator, retaining ftill their firft Values, by this general RULE. Multiply the Numerator of each Fraftion into all the Denominators, but its own, for a new Numerator, and multiplying all the Denominators together, the Produfljhall be a ammon Denominator to all the Numerators... | |
 | Anthony Birks, John Birks - 1766 - 640 Seiten
...fame value. RULE. Multiply all the denominators into each other for a new and common denominator, and each numerator into all the denominators but its own for a new numerator. i. Reduce |, £, and |, into fractions, having one common denominator. Firft, 4x9X5= 1 80, common denominator.... | |
 | Thomas Whiting - 1787 - 276 Seiten
...REDUCTION of VULGAR FRACTIONS. CASE I. PT"* О Reduce a Vulgar Fradlion to a common DeI nominator. RULE. Multiply each Numerator into all the "Denominators but its own for a m'w Numerator. Multiply all the Denominators for a common Denominator. EXAMPLES. 1. Reduce | and ~... | |
 | John Thomas Hope - 1790 - 430 Seiten
...ReduBion of Vulgar FraSlions. CASE 1. To reduce vulgar fractions to a common denoml« Bator. RULE. Firft, Multiply each numerator into all the denominators but its own for a new numeiator. Secondly, Multiply all the denominators for a common denominator. (i) Reduce | and {. to... | |
 | Peter Nicholson - 1809 - 426 Seiten
...IV. To reduce a fraction of different denominations to equivalent ones, having a common denominator. Multiply each numerator into all the denominators but its own, for a numerator to the required fraction, and all the denominators continually, for a common denominator.... | |
 | Osgood Carleton - 1810 - 264 Seiten
...-j1,-. CASE II. To reduce vulgar fractions of different denominations, to a common denominator. RULE. Multiply each numerator into all the denominators, but its own, for a new numerator. 2. Multiply all the denominators together, for a common denominator. * As no number, except I, will... | |
 | James Maginness - 1821 - 378 Seiten
...same value, that shall have a common denominator. 2. To do this, we must multiply each numerator by all the denominators but its own, for a new numerator, and all the denominators for a common de nominator, and the thing is done. EXAMPLES. I. Reduce |, }•£ and... | |
 | Thomas Dilworth - 1825 - 214 Seiten
...VULGAR CASE 1 . Jti oW are Vulgar Fraetions redueed to a eommon denominator ? .4. 1. Multiply eaeh Numerator into all the Denominators but its own, for a new Numerator. 2. Multiply all the Denominators for a eommon Denominator. *L 1 Reduee f&|to a eommon denominator.... | |
 | James L. Connolly (mathematician.) - 1829 - 266 Seiten
...denominator, and still retain the same value. RULK. Reduce the given fractions to their lowest terms ; then multiply each numerator into all the denominators but its own, for a new numerator, and all the denominators into each other for a common denominator. EXAMPLE. Reduce j, | , }, |, to a common... | |
 | James L. Connolly (mathematician.) - 1835 - 264 Seiten
...denominator, and still retain the same value. Rum. Reduce the given fractions to their lowest terms ; then multiply each numerator into all the denominators but its own, for a new numerator, and all the denominators into each other for a common denominator. EXAMPLE. Reduce $, f , i, |, to a common... | |
| |
Pike and Daboll give both methods. Dilworth's rule for reducing fractions to a common denominator is: "1. Multiply each numerator into all the denominators but its own for a new numerator. 2. Multiply all the denominators for a new denominator." The least... 
