The Northeastern Reporter, Band 126West Publishing Company, 1920 Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio. |
Inhalt
| 30 | |
| 69 | |
| 103 | |
| 153 | |
| 177 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 480 | |
| 488 | |
| 499 | |
| 507 | |
| 526 | |
| 568 | |
| 602 | |
| 607 | |
| 224 | |
| 253 | |
| 272 | |
| 273 | |
| 347 | |
| 358 | |
| 363 | |
| 368 | |
| 379 | |
| 417 | |
| 432 | |
| 453 | |
| 460 | |
| 615 | |
| 620 | |
| 649 | |
| 676 | |
| 709 | |
| 733 | |
| 740 | |
| 761 | |
| 773 | |
| 869 | |
| 908 | |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
action affirmed agent alleged amended amount appellant's Appellate Court appellee assessment authority automobile bill Boston cause charge circuit court claim commission commissioners common law Company compensation complainant Constitution contract Cook county corporation death deceased decree deed demurrer Digests and Indexes directors duty employé equity evidence executed executor fact fee simple fendant filed heirs held husband Indexes 126 injury Judge judgment jury Key-Numbered Digests land liability Mary Egan Mass ment Moody church motion municipal negligence North Judson Ohio Ohio St overruled paid paragraph parties payment person petition plaintiff in error question railroad real estate reason refused Rosehill Cemetery rule statute street superior court Supreme Court Supreme Judicial Court sustained testator testified thereof Thomas Glascock tiff tion topic and KEY-NUMBER tract trial court trust verdict vote wife witness
Beliebte Passagen
Seite 226 - Newly discovered evidence, material for the party making the application, which he could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced at the trial; 5.
Seite 92 - ... association fail to determine a standard as above provided, it shall be the duty of the Interstate Commerce Commission to do so, before July first, eighteen hundred and ninety-four, and immediately to give notice thereof as aforesaid.
Seite 333 - The question always is, was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury, — a continuous operation? Did the facts constitute a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural whole, or was there some new and independent cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?
Seite 119 - ... hereditament, it shall go to the executor or administrator of the party that had the estate thereof by virtue of the grant ; and if the same shall come to the executor or administrator either by reason of a special occupancy or by virtue of this act, it shall be assets in his hands, and shall go and be applied and distributed in the same manner as the personal estate of the testator or intestate.
Seite 145 - It need not have been foreseen or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence.
Seite 333 - But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances.
Seite 180 - ... evidence and again at the close of all the evidence. The court denied the motion.
Seite 47 - A creditor whose debtor is the owner of a negotiable bill shall be entitled to such aid from courts of appropriate jurisdiction by injunction and otherwise in attaching such bill, or in satisfying the claim by means thereof as is allowed at law or in equity in regard to property which cannot readily be attached or levied upon by ordinary legal process.
Seite 188 - where a principal has, by his voluntary act, placed an agent in such a situation that a person of ordinary prudence, conversant with business usages and the nature of the particular business, is justified in presuming that...
Seite 333 - We do not say that even the natural and probable consequences of a wrongful act or omission are in all cases to be charged to the misfeasance or nonfeasance. They are not when there is a sufficient and independent cause operating between the wrong and the injury. In such a case the resort of the sufferer must be to the originator of the intermediate cause. But when there is no Intermediate sufficient cause, the original wrong must be considered as reaching to the effect, and proximate to it. The...