 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 726 Seiten
...difficult to bring the case within any recognized rule of novelty by which the patent can be sustained. The use of one material instead of another in constructing...a known machine is, in most cases, so obviously a mattor of mere mechanical judgment, and not of invention, that it cannot be called an invention, unless... | |
 | Charles Sidney Whitman - 1875 - 814 Seiten
...difficult to bring the case within any recognized rule of novelty by which the patent can be sustained. The use of one material instead of another in constructing...called an invention, unless some new and useful result, an increase of efficiency, or a decided saving in the operation, is clearly attained. Some evidence... | |
 | J. D. White, John Hugh McQuillen, George Jacob Ziegler, James William White, Edward Cameron Kirk, Lovick Pierce Anthony - 1877 - 694 Seiten
...manufacture. This was intimated very clearly in the case of Hicks vs. Kelsey, 18 Wall., 670, where it was said "the use of one material instead of another in constructing...where a machine has acquired new functions and useful properties, it may be patentablc as an invention, though the only change made in the machine has been... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1877 - 748 Seiten
...This was intimated very clearly in the case of Hicks v. Kelsey, 18 Wall. 670, where it was said, " The use of one material instead of another in constructing...where a machine has acquired new functions and useful properties, it may be patentable as an invention, though the only change made in the machine has been... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (2nd Circuit) - 1877 - 648 Seiten
...within the principle which was enunciated in Hii-ka v. Kelsey, (18 Wall., 673): Dal ton r. Nelson. " The use of one material instead of another, in constructing...called an invention, unless some new and useful result, an increase of efficiency, or a decided saving in the operation, is clearly attained." Here, the substitution... | |
 | 1877 - 558 Seiten
...was intimated very clearly in the case of Hick» v. Keleey, 18 Wall. 670, where it was said •• the use of one material instead of another in constructing a known machine is, m most cages, so obviously a matter of mere mechanical judgment, and not of invention, that it cannot... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1877 - 678 Seiten
...invention comes within the principle which was enunciated in Hicks vs. Kelsey, (18 Wall., 673 :) Tbe use of one material instead of another in constructing a known machine is in more cases so obviously a matter of mere mechanical judgment and not of invention that it cannot be... | |
 | 1878 - 620 Seiten
...intimated very clearly in the case of Hicks vs. Kelsey, 18 "Wall., 670, where it was said " the nse of one material instead of another in constructing...result, where a machine has acquired new functions ::nd useful properties, it may be patentable as an invention, though the only change made in the machine... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1878 - 466 Seiten
...judgment, and not of invention, that it cannot be called an invention unless some new and useful result, aa increase of efficiency, or a decided saving in the operation, be obtained. Bnt where there is some such new and useful result, where a machine has acquired new functions and... | |
 | 1903 - 1108 Seiten
...Kelsey, 18 Wall. 670, 21 L. Ed. 852. In Hicks v. Kelsey, cited above, the rule is stated as follows : "The use of one material instead of another In constructing...judgment, and not of Invention, that It cannot be called invention, unless some new and useful result, an increase of efficiency, or a decided saving In the... | |
| |
The use of one material instead of another in constructing a known machine is, in most cases, so obviously a matter of mere mechanical judgment, and not of invention, that it cannot be called an invention, unless some new and useful result, as increase... 
