CAMMEYER v. NEWTON. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 225-237. Oct. Term, 1876.. [Bk. 24, L. ed. 72; 11 O. G. 287.] Affirming Ibid, 12 Blatch. 122. Assignment prior to patenting. Evidence. Patent. First inventor. Particular patent construed. Infringement. Gov ernment use of patented article. CAWOOD PATENT. THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. TURRILL; THE MICHIGAN SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN INDIANA RAILROAD CO. v. TURRILL; THE CHICAGO AND ALTON RAILROAD Co. v. TURRILL; THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD CO. v. TURRILL; THE PITTSBURGH, FORT WAYNE AND CHICAGO RAILWAY Co. v. TURRILL. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 695-711. Oct. Term, 1876. [Bk. 24, L. ed. 238; 12 O. G. 709]. Particular patent construed. Infringement. Novelty—how deter mined. Invention. Accounting for infringement. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY R. R. CO. v. TURRILL. See CAWOOD PATENT. CHICAGO AND ALTON R. R. CO. v. TURRILL. See CAWOOD PATENT PAGE 514 COCHRANE v. DEENER. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 780-792. Oct. Term, 1876 288 [Bk. 24, L. ed. 139; 11 O. G. 687]. Powers of Supreme Court of District of Columbia. Discretion of equity court as to trial at law. Jurisdiction. Particular patent construed. Infringement. Formal change. Process-patentability. Process defined. Art. Equivalents. Prior foreign patent. PAGE. COCHRANE v. DEENER. 95 (5 Otto) U. S. 355-356. Oct. Term, 1877 396 [Bk. 24, L. ed. 514]. Motion to vacate on ground of collusive decree. CONOVER, MEVS v. CONSOLIDATED FRUIT JAR COMPANY v. WRIGHT. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 92-97. Oct. Term, 1876. 39 46 [Bk. 24, L. ed. 68.] Affirming Ibid, 12 Blatch. 149. Particular patent construed. Abandonment. Act 1839, sec. 7, 59 Particular patent con Combination. Infringe DUNBAR v. MEYERS. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 187-202. Oct. Term. 1876. strued. Invention. Duplication. Improvement. Pat- EDDY v. DENNIS, DENNIS v. EDDY. 95 (5 Otto) U. S. 560-570. Oct. ment. Term, 1877.. [Bk. 24, L. ed. 363.] Reversing Dennis v. Eddy, 4 Fish. 423. Particular patent construed. Infringement. ELIZABETH v. PAVEMENT CO. 97 (7 Otto) U. S. 126–144. Oct. Term, 1877. [Bk. 24, L. ed. 1000.] Reversing in part American Nicholson Pavement Co. v. City of Elizabeth, 1 Ban. & Ard. 439. Particular patent construed. Novelty. Infringement. Prior foreign patent date of, in order to anticipate. Public experimental use not abandonment. Public use. Profits. Burden of proof. Contract. Reduction of profits. FRUIT JAR CO. v. WRIGHT. See CONSOLIDATED FRUIT JAR CO. FULLER v. YENTZER v. GOODRICH. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 299–307. 400 514 Burden of proving infringement. Particular patent construed. FULLER v. YENTZER. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 288-299. Oct. Term, 1876. 138 [Bk. 24, L. ed. 103; 11 O. G. 551.] |