Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[graphic][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

CAMMEYER v. NEWTON. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 225-237. Oct. Term,

1876..

[Bk. 24, L. ed. 72; 11 O. G. 287.]

Affirming Ibid, 12 Blatch. 122.

Assignment prior to patenting. Evidence. Patent. First inventor. Particular patent construed. Infringement. Gov

ernment use of patented article.

CAWOOD PATENT. THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. TURRILL; THE MICHIGAN SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN INDIANA RAILROAD CO. v. TURRILL; THE CHICAGO AND ALTON RAILROAD Co. v. TURRILL; THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD CO. v. TURRILL; THE PITTSBURGH, FORT WAYNE AND CHICAGO RAILWAY Co. v. TURRILL. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 695-711. Oct. Term, 1876.

[Bk. 24, L. ed. 238; 12 O. G. 709].

Particular patent construed. Infringement.

Novelty—how deter

mined. Invention. Accounting for infringement.

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY R. R. CO. v. TURRILL. See

CAWOOD PATENT.

CHICAGO AND ALTON R. R. CO. v. TURRILL. See CAWOOD PATENT
CITY OF ELIZABETH. See ELIZABETH v. PAVEMENT CO..

PAGE 514

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

COCHRANE v. DEENER. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 780-792. Oct. Term, 1876 288 [Bk. 24, L. ed. 139; 11 O. G. 687].

Powers of Supreme Court of District of Columbia. Discretion of equity court as to trial at law. Jurisdiction. Particular patent construed. Infringement. Formal change. Process-patentability. Process defined. Art. Equivalents. Prior foreign patent.

PAGE.

COCHRANE v. DEENER. 95 (5 Otto) U. S. 355-356. Oct. Term, 1877 396 [Bk. 24, L. ed. 514].

Motion to vacate on ground of collusive decree.

CONOVER, MEVS v.

CONSOLIDATED FRUIT JAR COMPANY v. WRIGHT. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 92-97. Oct. Term, 1876.

39

46

[Bk. 24, L. ed. 68.]

Affirming Ibid, 12 Blatch. 149.

Particular patent construed. Abandonment. Act 1839, sec. 7,

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

59

Particular patent con

Combination. Infringe

DUNBAR v. MEYERS. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 187-202. Oct. Term. 1876.
[Bk. 24, L. ed. 34; 11 O. G. 35.]
Disclaimer. Construction of patents.

strued. Invention. Duplication. Improvement. Pat-
entability. Mechanical skill.

EDDY v. DENNIS, DENNIS v. EDDY. 95 (5 Otto) U. S. 560-570. Oct.

ment.

Term, 1877..

[Bk. 24, L. ed. 363.]

Reversing Dennis v. Eddy, 4 Fish. 423.

Particular patent construed. Infringement.

ELIZABETH v. PAVEMENT CO. 97 (7 Otto) U. S. 126–144. Oct.

Term, 1877.

[Bk. 24, L. ed. 1000.]

Reversing in part American Nicholson Pavement Co. v. City

of Elizabeth, 1 Ban. & Ard. 439.

Particular patent construed. Novelty. Infringement. Prior foreign patent date of, in order to anticipate. Public experimental use not abandonment. Public use. Profits. Burden of proof. Contract. Reduction of profits.

FRUIT JAR CO. v. WRIGHT.

See CONSOLIDATED FRUIT JAR CO.

FULLER v. YENTZER v. GOODRICH. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 299–307.

400

514

[blocks in formation]

Burden of proving infringement. Particular patent construed.

FULLER v. YENTZER. 94 (4 Otto) U. S. 288-299. Oct. Term, 1876. 138

[Bk. 24, L. ed. 103; 11 O. G. 551.]

« ZurückWeiter »