Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. 199 U. S. for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. N. B. K. Pettingill for plaintiffs in error. No appearance for defendants in error. No. 143. THE CHICAGO AND ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. J. W. JACOBY, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. October 10, 1905. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error. Mr. John H. Doyle for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 189. WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN SLOOP. In error to the Kansas City Court of Appeals, State of Missouri. October 10, 1905. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. Wells H. Blodgett for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant error. No. 205. WILLIAM C. JUTTE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE MONONGAHELA RIVER CONSOLIDATED COAL AND COKE COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. October 10, 1905. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. Wm. B. Rodgers and Mr. Henry A. Davis for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 364. JERRY T. DONOVAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MICHAEL T. BERRY. In error to the Superior Court of the State of Massachusetts. October 10, 1905. Dismissed with costs, per stipulation. Mr. Arthur D. Hill for plaintiff in error. Mr. John J. Winn for defendant in error. No. 2. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. THE MISSOURI, KANSAS AND TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. Appeal from 199 U. S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. October 10, 1905. Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the appellant. The Attorney Gereral for appellant. No appearance for appellees. No. 4. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. GEORGE H. MINOR. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. October 10, 1905. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the nineteenth rule. Mr. Adelbert Moot for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles B. Wheeler for defendant in error. No. 23. CHARLES E. DAWSON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THOMAS E. WAGGAMAN, COLLECTOR, ETC. In error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. October 11, 1905. Dismissed with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiffs in error. Mr. D. W. Baker for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Irving Williamson for defendant in error. No. 8. THOMAS E. DAVIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. JACOB LIVING ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of West Virginia. October 11, 1905. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Maynard F Stiles for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendants in error. No. 28. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THE A. C. MCELROY MANUFACTURING COMPANY. On a certificate from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. October 16, 1905. Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the United States. The Attorney General for the United States. Mr. F. B. Bracken for the A. C. McElroy Manufacturing Company. No. 135. PREFERRED TONTINE MERCANTILE COMPANY ET AL., Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. 199 U. S. PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. LUTHER S. HICKMAN, SUPERVISOR, ETC. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. October 27, 1905. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. James H. Harkless for plaintiffs in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 139. THE UNITED STATES v. LEE SI KUM; and No. 140. THE UNITED STATES V. MAH QUONG KAY. On certificates from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. October 30, 1905. Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the United States. The Attorney General for the United States. No appearance for Lee Si Kum and Mah Quong Kay. No. 45. HENRY LOCKHART ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. H. C. LEEDS ET AL. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico. November 1, 1905. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the appellants. Mr. J. H. McGowan for appellants. Mr. W. B. Childers for appellees. No. 47. CUMULATIVE CREDIT COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. MOTLEY H. FLINT. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California. November 2, 1905. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. John B. Larner for appellant. The Attorney General for appellee. No. 48. PAUL DEROBERT v. NEVADA N. STRANAHAN. On a certificate from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. November 7, 1905. Stricken from the docket for want of prosecution. Mr. John A. Garver for Derobert. The Attorney General for Stranahan. No. 59. JOSE ANTONIO FERNANDEZ ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN 199 U. S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. ERROR, v. SALVADOR LUGO. In error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Porto Rico. November 8, 1905. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. James S. Harlan for plaintiffs in error. Mr. C. C.. Lancaster for defendant in error. No. 60. HARRY F. HARRIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. GEORGE F. ELLIOTT ET AL. In error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. November 8, 1905. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Frank J. Hogan for the plaintiff in error. Mr. D. W. Baker and Mr. Frank J. Hogan for plaintiffs in error. The Attorney General for defendants in error. No. 457. HOBART S. BIRD, APPELLANT, v. JOSE BERRIOS, WARDEN, ETC. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico. November 8, 1905. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for appellant. Mr. Gilbert E. Roe for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 498. RUDOLPH F. THEURER, EXECUTOR, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE UNITED STATES. In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana. December 4, 1905. Docketed and dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the defendant in error, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. No one opposing. No. 499. LUCIAN H. ALEXANDER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE CITY OF TACOMA ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. December 4, 1905. Docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. David A. Gourick for the defendant in error. No one opposing. No. 280. LA COMPANIA DE LOS FERROCARRILES DE PUERTO RICO, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOSE CASUELA GEIGEL. In Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. 199 U. S. error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Porto Rico. December 6, 1905. Dismissed with costs, and mandate granted, on motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Francis H. Dexter, Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. J. S. Flannery for plaintiff in error. Mrs. Ellen S. Mussey for defendant in error. No. 113. ANN FRANCIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PETER J. FRANCIS ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan. December 6, 1905. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Henry M. Duffield for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendants in error. No. 121. J. T. WIYGUL & SONS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. KANSAS CITY, MEMPHIS AND BIRMINGHAM RAILROAD COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi. December 7, 1905. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Fred Beall for plaintiffs in error. Mr. L. F. Parker, M A. B. Browne and Mr. Alexander Britton for defendant in error. " Circuit Court of the United December 11, 1905. Upon error case abated and writ No. 409. JOHN H. MITCHELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE UNITED STATES. In error to the States for the District of Oregon. suggestion of death of plaintiff in of error dismissed, on motion of Mr. John M. Thurston for the plaintiff in error. Mr. John M. Thurston for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General for defendant in error. No. 128. CHARLES A. DE ARNAUD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. FRED. C. AINSWORTH. In error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. December 11, 1905. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. F. P. B. Sands |