Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 199 U.S. No. 26. JOHN J. DELAHANTY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM T. PITKIN ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut. Argued October 27, 1905. Decided October 30, 1905. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Giles v. Teasley, 193 U. S. 146; Remington Paper Company v. Watson, 173 U. S. 443; Smalley v. Laugenour, 196 U. S. 93; Wabash Railroad Company v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29. Case below, 76 Connecticut, 412. Mr. Lewis E. Stanton and Mr. Sidney E. Clarke for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles E. Perkins and Mr. Wm. Waldo Hyde for defendants in error. No. 36. EDWARD WHITE, APPELLANT, v. AUGUSTA Patten GLOVER ET AL. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Argued November 1, 1905. Decided November 6, 1905. Per Curiam. Case below, 23 App. D. C. 389. L. T. Michener, Mr. Chester H. Emig for appellant. Mr. Corcoran Thom and Mr. Henry P. Blair for appellees. Decree affirmed with costs. Mr. E. F. Colladay, Mr. Krum and Mr. Clayton E. No. 38. HARRY J. CANTWELL ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE STATE OF MISSOURI. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. Argued November 2 and 3, 1905. Decided November 6, 1905. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11; Jackson v. Lamphire, 3 Pet. 280. Case below, State v. Cantwell, 179 Missouri, 245. Mr. Harry J. Cantwell pro se. Mr. North T. Gentry, Mr. John H. Murphy and Mr. Herbert S. Hadley for defendant in error. No. 42. ALLISON D. GIBBS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ROBERT S. MCDOUGALL. In error to the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands. Submitted for plaintiff in error November 6, 199 U.S. Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 1905. Decided November 13, 1905. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173. Mr. Jno. F. Shafroth for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 43. THE CITIZENS' NATIONAL BANK ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, USE, ETC., OF BOYLE COUNTY. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Argument for plaintiffs in error commenced November 6, 1905. The court declined to hear further argument November 7, 1905. Decided November 13, 1905. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173. Mr. Robert T. Quisenberry for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John W. Yerkes for defendant in error. No. 115. THOMAS R. SHAW, RECEIVER, ETC., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. NATIONAL GERMAN-AMERICAN BANK OF ST. PAUL, MINN. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Submitted November 10, 1905. Decided November 13, 1905. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. California Bank v. Kennedy, 167 U. S. 362; Concord First Bank v. Hawkins, 174 U. S. 364; Scott v. Deweese, 181 U. S. 202; Matteson v. Dent, 176 U. S. 521. Case remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesotà. Mr. Guy C. H. Corliss for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. W. Lusk for defendant in error. No. 14, Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM W. BIERCE, LIMITED, PETITIONER. Submitted November 27, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. Per Curiam. Leave to file petition for writs of mandamus or certiorari granted, and on consideration thereof and of the record presented therewith it is ordered that an appeal be, and it is hereby, allowed, Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 199 U. S. without prejudice, from the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii in the case of Bierce, Limited (a corporation), v. Hutchins, Trustee, on appellant giving bond in the penal sum of $1,000, conditioned according to law and approved by the Chief Justice of said Supreme Court or an associate justice thereof. Mr. Charles H. Aldrich for petitioner. No. 66. JOHN C. GORE, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE UNITED STATES ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the ` United States for the Northern District of California. Submitted November 9, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Gwin v. United States, 184 U. S. 669, 672; Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 56; American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville Railway Company, 148 U. S. 372, 383; Borgmeyer v. Idler, 159 U. S. 418; Muse v. Arlington Hotel Co., 168 U. S. 430. Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 826, 517, §§ 5, 6. Mr. Hamilton Gay Howard for appellants. Mr. H. G. Platt and Mr. Richard Bayne for appellees. No. 103. THE MOBILE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, APPELLANT, V. THE CITY OF MOBILE ET AL. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Argued December 6, 1905. Decided December 11, 1905. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 826, c. 517, §6; Colorado Central Consolidated Mining Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138; Rouse v. Letcher, 156 U. S. 47; Carey v. Houston and Texas Central Railway Company, 161 U. S. 115; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691; Gableman v. Peoria Railway Company, 179 U. S. 335, 339; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U. S. 405; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Company, 191 U. S. 526; Mobile Transportation Company v. Mobile, 187 U. S. 482; S. C., 195 U. S. 631. Mr. Frederick G. Bromberg and Mr. Eugene H. Lewis for appellants. Mr. Harry T. Smith and Mr. Gregory L. Smith for appellees. 199 U. S. Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari. No. 92. WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. GENEVIEVE HALSTEAD MATHEW. In error to the Kansas City Court of Appeals for the State of Missouri. Argued December 5, 1905. Decided December 11, 1905. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with ten per cent damages, in addition to interest and costs. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. W. H. Blodgett for plaintiff in error. Mr. Grant I. Rosenzweig for defendant in error. Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari from October 9 to December 11, 1905. No. 264. LEONIDAS M. LAWSON ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. UNITED STATES MINING COMPANY. October 16, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted. Mr. Ogden Hiles, Mr. Charles J. Hughes, Jr., Mr. L. R. Rogers and Mr. Charles C. Dey for petitioners. Mr. George Sutherland, Mr. Waldemar Van Cott and Mr. E. M. Allison, Jr., for respondent. No. 255. JOSEPH R. DE LAMAR, PETITIONER, v. UTAHNEVADA COMPANY. October 16, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Mr. E. S. Pillsbury for petitioner. Mr. James G. Maguire, Mr. W. H. Metson and Mr. J. T. Houx for respondent. No. 265. R. J. Walbridge, PETITIONER, v. W. P. WALKER & Co. October 16, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. R. L. Batts for petitioner. No appearance for respondents. No. 271. LEWIS C. BURNES ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. FRANCES B. BURNES ET AL. October 16, 1905. Petition for a writ Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari. 199 U. S. of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. Stephen S. Brown, Mr. John E. Dolman, Mr. A. P. Jetmore and Mr. S. M. Gardenhire for petitioners. Mr. O. M. Spencer, Mr. Frank Hagerman and Mr. Vinton Pike for respondents. No. 276. BIG SIX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. S. DUFFIELD MITCHELL. October 16, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. Frank Hagerman and Mr. John W. Halliburton for petitioner. Mr. S. Duffield Mitchell for respondent. No. 277. P. S. BAILEY, PETITIONER, v. THOMAS F. WILLEFORD. October 16, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Mr. H. J. Haynsworth for petitioner. Mr. Robert B. Redwine for respondent. No. 279. JOSEPH BISSO ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. MALVINA L. QUINETTE. October 16, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. L. C. Quintero and Mr. John D. Grace for petitioners. No appearance for respondent. No. 410. THE ETNA INDEMNITY COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM M. LADD ET AL. October 16, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Mr. Joseph C. Campbell, Mr. William H. Metson and Mr. George H. MacKellar for petitioner. Mr. George H. Williams and Mr. C. E. S. Wood for respondents. No. 400. J. B. ORCUTT COMPANY ET AL., PETITIONERS, V. |