NAMES OF CASES. Where several references occur in the following List, the first after the name is generally that of the principal Report of the case. Cochrane (Ld.) v. Smethurst, 241. Coleman v. Wathen, 136. Collinge v. Bowman, 294. Cornish v. Keene (N.P.), 501, 44, 216, 493, 535. Cornish v. Keene (C. P.), 512, 513, 44, 216, 396, 454, 493, 495, 705, 710. Cowley, Russell v. Crane v. Price (N. P.), 377, 16. Craw v. Ramsay, 49. Crofts v. Peach, 268, 262, 269. b De la Rue, Sturtz v. Derby Gas Light Company, Crossley v. Devonshire's (Earl of) case, 41. Dollond's case, 43, 53, 124, 142, 240, 244. Downton's patent, in re (P. C.), 565. Edgebury v. Stephens, 35, 8, 44, 188, 438, 447. Edinburgh, Solicitors of, Mc Andrews v. Eldred, Lowe v. Elgie v. Webster, 417. Harmar v. Playne (K. B.), 75, 406, 413. (Ch.), 212, 230, 232, 281, 282, 283, 285, 406, 413. Harris, Barker &, v. Shaw. Hart, Wells &, Minter v. Hastings' case, 6. Hawkes, Brunton v. Haworth v. Hardcastle, 42, 159, 188, 192, 480, 486. Hayne v. Maltby, 291, 290, 293, 294, 295. Heath v. Unwin, 551. Heathcote, ex parte, in re Lacy, 431. Helliwell v. Dearman, 401. Henson, ex parte, in re Alcock, 432. Heurteloup's patent, in re (P. C.) 553. Hill v. Thompson & Forman (N. P.), 232, 42, 276. Losh v. Hague (N. P.), 202, 145, 410. Lovell v. Hicks, 295. (Exch.), 203, 209. (Ch.), 200. Lowe v. Eldred, 516. Lysaght v. Walker, 516. Mc Andrews v. Solicitors of Edinburgh, 34. Macintosh's Patent, in re (P. C.), 739. Manton v. Parker, 192, 484. Marling, Lewis v. May, Morgan v. Protheroe v. Metcalfe, R. v. Minchin v. Clement, 249. Minter v. Mower, 138, 44, 76, 281, 396. Minter v. Wells & Hart (N. P.), 126, 127, 223. 142, 350, 686. Nickels' Patent, in re (M. R.), 650. (L. C.), 656. Nightingale, Arkwright v. O'Brien v. Saxon, 257. Oldham v. Langmead, 291, 294. O'Reilly, ex parte, 432, 418. Page v. Pearce, 272. Pears, Watson v. Perry v. Mitchell, 269, 262. v. Skinner, 250, 646. Philip, Ridgeway v. Playne, Harmar v. Porter, Blackrey v. Potter, Walton v. Praed v. Duchess of Cumberland, 514, 516. Pratt, Jupe v. (Exch.), 134, Price, Crane v. Macfarland v. & Hart, Minter v. Westrupp & Gibbins' Patent, ex parte Whitehouse's Patent, ex parte Russell, Williams v. Brodie, 75. Wilson v. Tindal, 730. Wood v. Zimmer, 44, 82, 188, 190, 194. Zimmer, Wood v. REPORTS AND NOTES OF CASES ON LETTERS PATENT FOR INVENTIONS. THE CASE OF MONOPOLIES. DARCY V. ALLIN. [An. 44 El. 11 Co. R. 84: Noy 178.] THIS was an action for the infringement of letters patent for the sole making and selling of cards, and the declaration stated, that the queen, perceiving that divers subjects of able bodies, which might go to plough, did employ themselves in the art of making of cards, she did, by her letters patent, (13 Jun. 30 El.) grant to Ralph Bowes, that he, by himself, his factors, and assigns, as well denizens as strangers, might buy and provide beyond the seas playing cards, and cause them to be brought into England, or into her dominions, by whatsoever means, and utter, sell, or distribute the same, in gross or by retail; and that he should have the whole trade of making and selling of cards in England, &c., and that none should have the making and selling of cards within her dominions but he, for 12 years, straitly restraining all her subjects, other than the said Ralph Bowes, his factors and assigns, from the making and selling thereof: that by other letters patent, of 11 Aug. 40 El., reciting those above recited, the same exclusive privilege was granted to the plaintiff for 21 years, to begin after the expiration of the former term of 12 years; and that plaintiff was possessed of that interest; and that the former term expired 13 Jun. 42 El.; and that plaintiff after the expiration of the said term, to wit, on the, &c., caused 4,000 gross of cards to be made in London at his charges, amounting to, &c., for the necessary use of the subjects. That the defendant, knowing the premises, 15 May, 44 El. caused 80 gross of cards to be made, he being a subject, and no assignee or factor to the plaintiff; and 16 May, 44 El., did sell half a gross of playing cards to, &c., for &c., which were not made in England, or brought into England, by the plaintiff or his factor, without license of the queen, or consent of the plaintiff, he being a subject, whereby the plaintiff was defrauded of the benefit which he was to enjoy by his charter, to his damage of £200. B |