Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

claimed from the garnishee), and for costs, and if in that behalf, whereof the said E. F. is convicted, and the amount thereof be paid to the plaintiff or his attor- have the said monies before us for in Common Plean, ney within four days from the service hereof, further “ before our justices," or in the Excheguer, “ before the procredings will be stayed.

barons of our Exchequer"], at Westminster, imme Within three days after the service fill up the follow- diately after the execution hereof, to be rendered to the ing indorsement :) This writ was served by me, X. Y., said A. B., and that you do all such things as by the on C. D., on the — day of ,18m.

statute passed in the second year of our reign you are 25. Declaration thereon.

authorised and required to do in this behalf; and in In the Queen's Bench (or “ Common Pleas,” or “ Ex

what manner you shall have executed this our writ

make appear to us for in the Common Pleas, “ to our chequer of Pleas.”]

justices,” or in the Exchequer, “to the harons of our The day of —-, A. D.

Exchequer," as the case may be), at Westminster, (Venue). A. B., by his attorney (or “in per- immediately after the execution hereof; and have you son"], sues E. F. by a writ issued forth of this court, in there then this writ. Witness - at Westminster, these words, “ Victoria,' &c. [copy the writ]; and the the day of , in the year of our Lord — said E. F. has appeared to the said writ, and the said

31. Ca. Sa. therein. A. B., by his attorney aforesaid, says that the said debt due from the said E. F. to the said C. D. is for

Victoria, by the grace of God of the United King &e. (here state the debt as in a declaration in ordinary

dom of Great Britain and Ireland, Queen, Defender a cases); and the said A. B. prays that execution may

the Faith, to the Sheriff of greeting. We combe adjudged to him accordingly for the said £

mand you that you onit not by reason of any liberty and for costs of suit in this behalf.

of your county, but that you enter the same, and

take E. F., if he should be found in your bailiwick, and 26. Plea thereto.

him safely keep, so that you may have his body before In the Queen's Bench [or * Common Pleas," or "Ex us (or in the Common Pleas, “ before our justices," or in chequer of Pleas."]

the Erchequer, “ before the barons of our Exchequer," The day of — , A.D.

as the case may be], at Westminster, immediately after E. F. 7 The said E. F., by his attorney, says

the execution hereof, to satisfy A.B. £- , the amount ats. A. B.) that he never was indebted to the said (or “ part of the amount,” if the debt be more than the C. D., as alleged for plead such other defence, or several judgment debt] of a debt due from the said E. F. to C.D., defences, as in other cases.]

and for the levying of which it has been adjudged by

our Court of Queen's Bench for “ Common Pleas," 27. Issue thereon.

“ Exchequer of Pleas”, that the said A. B. should have [Copy the declaration and pleadings, and conclude his execution against the said E. F. to satisfy (or “to'thus:] Therefore let a jury come &c.

wards satisfying," if the debt be less than the judgment 28. Postea thereon.

debt] {--- which the said A. B., on —— (the date [The same as in ordinary cases, omitting the assess

the judgment against the judgment debtor), by the judg. ment of damages.]

ment of the said Court recovered against the said C.D.,

and further to satisfy the said A. B. £- , which in our 29. Judgment for Plaintiff therein.

same court were adjudged to the said A. B. for his costs [The same as in ordinary cases, to the statement of the of suit which he hath been put to on occasion of our judgment, which may be thus :) Therefore it is con- | writ sued out against the said E. F. at the suit of the sidered that the said A. B. have execution against the said A. B, in that behalf, whereof the said E. F. is colisaid E. F. for the said £- , the amount (or “part victed; and have you there then this writ. Witness of the amount”] of the said debt due from him to the at Westminster, the day of — , in the year of our said C. D., to satisfy (or “ towards satisfying,” if the Lord – debt be less than the judgment debt] the said £— which the said A. B., on the said - day of ?| 32. Judgment for the Plaintiff after Verdict that a Man184, (date of judgment against judgment debtor), by the

damus do issue, under Sect. 71 of the Common-law judgment of this Court recovered against the said C.D.;

Procedure Act, 1854. and it is further considered that the said A. B. do re-| [The same as in the ordinary form of an entry of a cover against the said E. F. £— for his costs of judgment to the end of the postea, and then thus:) Theresuit in this behalf.

fore it is considered that a writ of mandamus do issue 30. Fi. Fa. therein.

commanding the defendant to Chere state the duty to be

performed, or the thing to be done, as claimed by the deVictoria, by the grace of God of the United King- 'claration): and it is also considered that the plaintiff do dom of Great Britain and Ireland, Queen, Defender of recover of the defendant the said monies by the justhe Faith, to the Sheriff of greeting. We com- | tices for “ by the judge” or “ baron"7 aforesaid in form mand you that you omit not by reason of any liberty | aforesaid above assessed, and also £-- for his costs of of your county, but that you enter the same, and of suit in this behalf. the goods and chattels of E. F. in your bailiwick you [In the margin of the judgment opposite the first words, cause to be made £- , the amount (or “ part of the Therefore it is considered” &c., write "Judgment, amount,” if the debt be more than the judgment debt] of signed the day of 18— ” i serting the day of a debt due from the said E. F. to C. D., to satisfy (or signing final judgment.] " towards satisfying," if the debt be less than the judgment debt £— which A. B., on the ---- day of | 33. Writ of Inquiry to ascertain the Expense incurred --, 184, (date of judgment against judgment debtor), by the doing of an Act, and for the doing of tokicko by the judgment of our Court of Queen's Bench for Mandamus was issued. “ Common Pleas,” or “Exchequer of Pleas”, recovered Victoria, by the grace of God of the United King. against the said C. D., and whereupon it has been dom of Great Britain and Ireland, Queen, Defender el adjudged by our said Court that the said A. B. should the Faith, to the Sheriff of -- greeting. Whereas have execution against the said E. F. for the said / upon an application by A. B., the plaintiff in an action £- , and also £- , which in our same court against C. D. in our Court of Queen's Bench [o were adjudged to the said A. B. for his costs of suit “ Common Pleas,” or “Exchequer of Pleas," as the which he hath been put to on occasion of our writ sued | case may be at Westminster, our said Court did on the out against the said F. F. at the suit of the said A. B. day of — , A.D. — (date of order), direct that

[state the terms of the order directing the act to be | 36. Indorsement on Writ of Summons of Claim of a lone at the defendant's expense] ; and the said A. B. Writ of Injunction, under Sect. 79 of the Commonor “and E. F.if another person than the plaintiff has law Procedure Act, 1854. leen appointed by the Court to do the act] has done the The plaintiff intends to claim a writ of injunction aid act so directed to be done; and in order to enable to restrain the defendant from [here state concisely ur said Court to ascertain the amount of the expense for what the writ of injunction is required, as, for of the doing the same, we command you that by the example, thus : "felling or cutting down any timber ath of twelve good and lawful men of your bailiwick

or trees standing, growing, or being in or upon the land rou diligently inquire what is the amount of the ex. and premises at - in the county of —, and from lenses incurred by the said A. B. [or“ by E. F.,as the committing any further or other waste or spoil in or use may be) in the doing of the said act, and that you upon the said land and premises.”] And take notice, end to us (or in Common Pleas, “ to our justices,” or in that in default of the defendant's entering an appearance Exchequer, "" to the barons of our Exchequer”], at as within commanded, the plaintiff may, besides proNestminster, on the —

day of

now next en- ceeding to judgment and execution for damages and uing, the inquisition which you shall thereupon take, costs, apply for and obtain such writ. inder your seal, and the seal of those by whose onth

CAMPBELL.

C. CRESSWELL. fou shall take that inquisition, together with this writ.

JOHN JERVIS.

W. ERLE. Nitness — (name of Chief Justice, or in Exchequer of

FRED. POLLOCK. SAML. MARTIN. Thief Baron), at Westminster, the day of , in

J. Parke.

CHARLES CROMPTON. he year of our Lord

E. H. ALDERSON. R. B. CROWDER. H. Writ of Execution in Detinue under Sect. 78 of the Nov. 27, 1854. Common-lar Procedure Act, 1854, for the Return of the Chattel detained, and for a Distringas until returned, separate from a Writ for Damages or Costs.

Court Papers. Victoria, by the grace of God of the United Kinglom of Great Britain and Ireland, Queen, Defender of EQUITY SITTINGS, AFTER MICHAELMAS he Faith, to the Sheriff of - -greeting. We command

TERM, 1854. rou that you omit not by reason of any liberty of your

Court of Chancery. ounty, but that you enter the same, and without lelay you cause the following chattels, that is to say,

Before the LORD CHANCELLOR, at Lincoln's Inn. here enumerate the chattels recorered by the judgment Friday ... Dec. 1{ Fipea Seal.-Appeal Motions and Apor the return of which execution has been ordered to ssue], to be returned to A.B., which the said A. B. lately

Saturday

2 Petitions and Appeals.

Monday.. n our court before us (or in the Common Pleas, “before

Tuesday

5 Appeals. ur justices,or in the Exchequer,“ before the barons

Wednesday 6 f our Exchequer”] at Westminster recovered against

Second Seal.-Appeal Motions and S.D. in an action for the detention of the same, whereof Thursday

Appeals. he said C. D. is convicted*. And we further command Friday rou, that if the said chattels cannot be found in your Saturday

9 bailiwick, you omit not by reason of any liberty of your Monday.. 11 > Appeals. County, but that you enter the same, and distrain the Tuesday.. 12 i jaid C.D. by all his lands and chattels in your bailiwick, Wednesday 13j so that neither the said C.D., nor any one for him, do Thursday 14 { Thpreal Scal.—Appeal Motions and Ap. ay hands on the same, until the said C.D. render to

Friday

15 he said A. B. the said chattels ; and in what manner

16 Appeals.

Saturday you shall have executed this our writ make appear to

Monday... 18 is (or in Common Pleas, to our justices,

Fourth Seal.--Appeal Motions and Ecchequer, “ to the barons of our Exchequer"], at Tuesday........ 19

Appeals.
Westminster, immediately after the execution hereof; Wednesday. 20 Petitions and Appeals.
and have you there then this writ. Witness — at
Westpinster, the

in the year of our

Before the Lords JUSTICES, at Lincoln's Inn, Lord

Friday .. Dec. 1 First Seal.-Appeal Motions and Ap35. The like, bu instead of a Distress until the Chattel

Saturday

2) peals. is returned, commanling the Sheriff to levy on Defend- Monday.. ant's Goods the assessed , Value of it.

Tuesday.

5 Appeals.

6 [Proceed as in the preceding fo... until them, and then Wednesday

that if the said thus :] And we further command you,

Thursday

7 Second Seal.- Appeal Motions and chattels cannot be found in your bailiwick, you

omit not

Appeals. by reason of any liberty of your county, but that

u Friday...

Petitions in Lunacy and Bankruptcy,

and Appeal Petitions. enter the same, and of the goods and chattels of the

day

9 said C. D. in your bailiwick you cause to be made

Satur.

> £- (the assessed value of the chattels), whereof the Monday... said C. D. is also convicted; and that in the execution

Tuesday. of this our last-mentioned command you do all such

Wednesday

Seal.-Appeal Motions and Ap

Third .. things as by the statute passeu in the second year of Thursday. 14

peals.

v and Bankruptcy, pur reign you are authorised and required to do in

Petitions in Luna., this behalf; and in what manner you shall have exe

15

and Appeal Petitions. zated this our writ make appear to us (or in the Saturday

16 Common Pleas, “to our justices,” or in the Exchequer, Monday.

18

} Appeals. "to the barons of our Exchequer,as the case may bej Tuesday,

19' Fourth Seal.- Appeal Motions. it Westminster, immediately after the execution hereof; Wednesday 20 Lunatic Petitions & Appeal Petitions. and have you there then this writ. Witness

Notice.-The days on which the Lords Justices shall be Westminster, the

in the year of our engaged at the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council are

or in

{

day of

8

11

12 /Appeals

,

13)

Friday

at

of

excepted.

Lord

Before the Right Hon. the MASTER OF THE ROLLS, at
Chancery-lane.

Saturday
Friday ...... Dec. 1 First Seal.-Motions.

Monday Saturday 2

Tuesday. Monday.. 4 Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims, Wednesday Tuesday

5 Further Directions, and Exceptions. Thursday Wednesday

6 Thursday 7 Second Seal.-Motions.

Friday Friday

8 Saturday

9 Monday..

Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims, Saturday 11

Further Directions, and Exceptions. Monday.. Tuesday..

12 Wednesday 13

Tuesday. Thursday 14 Third Seal.-Motions.

Wednesday Friday

15

Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims, Thursday Saturday

16 Monday.

Further Directions, and Exceptions.
18

Friday
Tuesday.. 19 Fourth Seal.--Motions.
Wednesday 20 Petitions in General Paper.

Saturday
N.B.-Short Causes, Consent Causes, Unopposed Petitions,
and Short Claims on Saturday the 2nd, Saturday the 9th, and Monday....
Saturday the 16th December, at the sitting of the Court.

Notice.-Consent Petitions must be presented, and copies Tuesday .....
left with the Secretary, on or before the Thursday preceding
the Saturday on which it is intended they should be heard. Wednesday ..

and General . Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Canses, 6

Claims, and Further Directions. 7 Second Seal.-Motions and General

Paper. 8 Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Canses,

Claims, and Further Directions. Petitions, Short Causes and Claims, 9

and General Paper. 11

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, 12 13

Claims, and Further Directions. Third Seal. - Motions and General 14

Paper.

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, 15

Claims, and Further Directions. 16 Petitions, Short Causes and Claims,

and General Paper.

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, 18

Claims, and Further Directions. Fourth Seal.-Motions and General 19

Paper.

20 { ,

Claims, and Further Directions.

Samet v. Element }

Before Vice-Chancellor Sir RICHARD T. KINDERSLEY, at
Lincoln's Inn.

EQUITY CAUSE LISTS, AFTER MICHAELMAS

TERM, 1854.
Friday Dec. 1 First Seal.-Motions and Causes.
Saturday

2 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. The following abbreviations have been adopted to Monday

abridge the space the Cause Papers would otherwise have occuTuesday..

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, pied:- A. Abated— Adj. Adjourned—A. T. After Term-4p. Wednesday

Claims, and Further Directions. 6

Appeal-C. D. Canse Day-Cl. Claim-C. Costs—D. DeThursday

7 Second Seal.-Motions and Causes. murrer-E. Exceptions-F. D. Further Directions-M. MoFriday 8 Petitions in General Paper.

tion-P. C. Pro Confesso-Pl. Plea-Ptn. Petition-R. ReSaturday 9 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. hearing-S. O. Stand Over--Sh. Short. Monday..

11
Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes,

Court of Chancery.
Tuesday.

12 Wednesday 13 Claims, and Further Directions.

Before the LORD CHANCELLOR. Thursday 14 Third Seal.-Motions and Causes.

APPEALS.

Fearnhead y. Bullivant Friday 15 Petitions in General Paper.

Attorney-Gen. 0. Clapham Goldsmith o. Russell Saturday 16 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. (Part beard)

Underwood v. Wing, Dec. II

Attorney-Gen. t. Alford
Monday....
Claims, and Further Directions. Reilly v. Lockhart

CAUSE,
Tuesday.. 19 Fourth Seal.--Motions and Causes. Coape v. Arnold
Wednesday 20 Petitions and Causes.

Arnold v. Coape }

Neale v. Farrer.
N. B.-Unopposed Petitions, not exceeding ten, at the
sitting of the Court, every day except Seal-days.

Before the LORDS JUSTICES.
APPEALS.

Baker o. Read
Before Vice-Chancellor Sir J. Stuart, at Lincoln's Inn.

Evans v. Evans (Part Jortin v. South-eastern Rail. Friday ...... Dec. 1 Paper.

Duncan v. Canman

Lake v. Bruton Saturday 2 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. Butterfield v. Rayner

Same v. Same Monday..

Hil. Terme Tuesday.

5

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Attorney-Gen. o. Mayor of Same 7. Hirtze!! Wednesday

Claims, and Further Directions. Beverley (Part heard) Smith v. Pawson. Thursday

Before the Right Hon. i'ne MASTER OF THE ROLLS. Friday 8 Petitions and General Paper.

CAUSES, &r. Saturday 9 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. Wilson v. Harley (Cause, part

Eavestaff r. Austin (M for deMonday.. 11

cree)

heard! Tuesday. Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes,

Slater v. Arnold (M for dec.) 12 Wednesday 13

Claims, and Further Directions. arker v. Bloxam (M for de. Miller v. Chapman (M for de. Third Seal. — Motions and General Kearley v. Kearley (CI)

cree, with M)

cree) Thursday 14

Curlewis v. Earl of Morning. Paper. Friday 15 Petitions and G

Bailey v. Hughes (Cause) ton (M for decree) Saturday 16 Short Car eneral Paper.

Green v. Dunn (M for decree) Sturgis v Dunn (Special case) -uses, Short Claims, & Causes. Baxendale v. Seale (M for dec.) Hutt v. Lautour (M for decree) Monday.......

-8, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Kebble v. Samms (3) (FD, C) Pennell v. Smith (Cause)

Claims, and Further Directions. Gray v. Haig (E, 2 sets, Edmonds •. Millett (M for Tuesday...

Fourth Seal.-Motions and General | Haig v. Gray) F D, C) decree)
19
Paper

Whitfield v. Bowyer (F D, Blackband o. Keen (Cause)

Att.-Gen, 0. Holme (Cause) Wednesday .. Claims, and Further Directions. Hele v. Bexley 7) (F DC) Hill v. Taine (Farther cons.)

Ridgway v. Clare (E, Ptn) Walmsley o. Cardwell (Caa.)

Greenslade o. Dare (Cause) Parsons v. Beebe Before Vice-Chancellor Sir W. P. Wood, at Lincoln's Inn.

}(Cause) Hardman v. Earle (Cause) Same v. Same

. Motions and General | Barham v. Boss (Cause) Friday ....

Swinton v. Wilson (Cause) Att.-Gen. v. Phillips (Cause) Haslam v. Wilson (CI)

{

way Co.

7 { Secaper.Seal.—-Motions and General

[ocr errors]

18 | Plen

20 {Pleasi Demander sur Exception Causes, Whitfield.es Sturgis, 0.2

Dec. 1 { Paper.

}(Cause)

Stephenson m.Popple } (Caus.) Smith v. Smith (Further con

Cookson w. Bingham }(Cau.)

}

Official Manager of the New. Poole v. Poole (M for decree) Boughen v. Farrer (Sp. case) Sturch v. Bolton

castle, Shields, &c. Banking Penfold v. Crossland (CI) Ramsden v. Hirst (M for dec.) Same o. Same

Co. t. Moffett (Cause) Shaw v. Neale (Cause) Harley v. Moon (Further con. Shelford v. Kane (Cause) Fortnum v. Shackel (5) (FD, Hartord v. Lloyd (Cause) sideration)

Dresser o. Hoare (M for dec.) C)

Child v. Child (Cause) Monro v. Proctor (F D, C) Wiles v. Gresham (Further Trutch r. Lamprell (M for Jefferies v. Michell (Cause) Rogers v. Dicks (M for dec.) consideration) decree)

Bell v. Whitbourn (M for dec.) Lacon o. Allen (Cause) Morland v. Isaacs (Cause) Meyrick v. Lawes (M for Austin v. Rickwood (CI) Wild v. Booker (Further con- Banks v. Braithwaite (F D, C) Same o. Matnias / decree) Hollingsworth v. Woodhead sideration)

Lyle v. Le Breton (CI) Sh Blunt o. De Mallets (Cause) (Cause)

Berry v. Charnock (M for de- | Att.-Gen. o. Baines (D, C) Hughes v. Williams (M for Pullen v. Fairthorne (M for cree)

Barnes v. Carter (CI) decree)

decree)

Dolman o. Curling (Cause) London and South-western Trafford v. Barton (Cause) Rogers v. Rogers (Cause) Ashcroft v. Powell (3) (Cause) Railway Co. (Cause) Murphy 1. Trench (Further Caledonian Railway Co. v. Patch v. Graves (M for dec.) Aubert v. Aubert (Cause) consideration)

Woodrow (Cause)

Countess of Mornington v. Taylor v. Portington (M for Yarginton o. Barker (M for Arkell o. Henly (Cause) Greenly (M for decree) decree) decree) Henly v. Henly (Cause)

Pogson ó. Burton (F D, C) Waugh r. Waddell (Cause) Capell v. Hyatt (M for decree) Same v. Same Partridge 7. Ives (M for dec.) Davies v. Hallett (M for dec.) Welch o. Coles (F D, C) sideration) Sh Williams o. Williams (CI) Bensley v. Riches (M for dec.) Dickenson v. Leacock (Fur- Powell v. Smith (Further conLady Glamis v. Cumberland Collinson v. Lister (Cause) ther consideration)

sideration) (Cause)

Brocklebank v. Johnson (M Mayne v. Mayne (Cause) Saunders v. Richardson (Cau.) Symes r. Magnay (M for dec.) for decree)

Dolman v. Nokes (Cause) Lawley v. King (M for decree) Watson o. Cleaver (M for de

Smith o. Banbury (F D, C, | Adlington Chippendale cree) Same v. Elliott

Pen)

(Further consideration) Warick v. Richards (Cause) M'Mullen v. Rea (M for dec.) Attorney. Gen. v. Drapers Co. Lewarne v. Collins (Cause) Wilkes v. Swann (CI) Nicholson v. Carr (M for dec.) (Cause)

Wayne v. Lewis Wynne o. Ogilvie M for dec.) Attorney-Gen. v. Harman (M Gibson v. Homcs (Cause) Same v. Parke

(E). Phipps v. Kilson (CI)

for decree) Pilkington o. Belton (M for Woodward v. Kerridge (CI)

Before Vice-Chancellor Sir J. STUART. decree)

Andrew v. Simmons (Cause) Jebb v. Tugwell (M for decree) Att.-Gen. v. Moor (Cause)

Pleas, DEMURRERS, Causes, &c. Elam v. Stead (M for decree) Turner v. Ramsay (Cause) Morison v. Morison (12) (E, | Collinge v. Knight (4) (E) Brady v. Morgan (M for dec.) Stabbing v. Hitchcock (Fur. F D, C, 2 Pens)

Singletonv. Pulmer (E,FD,C) Beere v. Beere (Cause)

ther consideration) Sh Thompson v. Clarke (M for Rose v. Smith (Further cons.) Turnley v. Biron (M for dec.) Nicholls v. Nicholls (Further decree)

Wiggins v. Peppin (4) (F D,C) Maddock v. Akid (M for dec.) consideration)

Butlin v. Groom (Cause) Hughes v. Paramore (E) Robioson v. Anderson (Cause) | Jones v. Dickson (M for dec.) Paul v. Cockeram (Cause) Ince v. Ince (Cause)

Houghton v. Lees (Cause) Mander 0. Cattell (Further

Goode v. Hollier (Cause) consideration) Before Vice-Chancellor Sir RICHARD T. KINDERSLEY.

Hichens v. Kelly (Cause) Ridler v. Yearsley (F D, C) Adams v. Wheatley (D) Gurney v. Gurney (CI) Williams v. Hodgson (Cause) | Cecil v. Nicholson (Further Causes, &c. Pawtrop v. Craven (Sp. case) | Paxton v. Newton (CI)

consideration) Lord o. Colvin (Cause) Thornber o. Wilson (Cause) Cole v. Eaton (Further cons.) Tickner o. Smith (Cause) Way (Cause)

v

Woodgate v. Archer Burton Clarke v. Whiteway (Further C) Woodgate v. Archer Burton

consideration) Bush v. Peterson (Cause) Torkington ». Bryant (M for

(E, F D, C). Llewellyn v. Morgan (F D, C) Stobart v. Todd (Cause) decree)

Herring v. Miles (Cause) Cropper o. Mellersh (M for Forrest o. Bowen (Cause) Creed v. Corner (M for dec.) Baker 0. Hardley (3) (Further decree) Bennett v. Locking (M for de. Tomson v. Judge (Cause) consideration)

Engleheart v. Ordell (F D, C, cree) Pennell v. Hume (Cause)

Hart v. Stride (Further cons.) Ptn) Gossip o. Wright (Cause) Newman v. Stone (CI) Diplock v. Hammond (Fur- Crosbie v. Bunnett (Cause) Crosse v. Robinson (CI) Moodie v. Bannister (Cause) ther consideration)

Stanley v. Wrigley (Cause) Darwell o. Roper (M for dec.) Campbell v. Lord Stafford (M Booth v. Marsden (Further Ibberson v. Warth (Cause) Wallace o. Backwell (Cause) for decree)

consideration)

Howard v. Lloyd (M for dec.) Augin o. Eastern Union Rail- Rogers v. Hooper (Cause) Broughton v. Broughton (6) Vincent v. Grods n (F D, C) way Co. (M for decree) Henderson o. Cook (Cause) (E, F D, C, Pun)

Franklin o. Franklin (Cause) Att.-Gen. v. Vansittart (Cau.) Tennant v. Parker (Cause)

(3) (v. Willie Fisher o. Baldwin (Cause) Williamson v. Wotton (CI) Blake v. Gregson (Cause) Wardle v. Marsden (M for de- C)

French o. Slade (3) (F D, C) . cree) Smyth v. Burd (CI)

Fowler v. Holt (F D, C) Coombs v. Herninan }(Ca.)

Bean v. Dawson (M for dec.) Munk v. Cole (F D, C) Nixon o. Masterman (M for Rumball t. Poole

Salter v. Adey (Cause)

Clarkson v. Same decree) Lukey c. Higgs (CI)

Williams v. Hughes (Cause) Johnson o. Bennett (F D, C) Casley v. Goodridge (CI) Sutcliffe v. Crosse (M for dec.) Greene o. Norton (4) (FD.C) Lomax v. Ripley (2) (Cause) Gibson v. Fairlamb (Further Birley o. Owen (CI)

Hudson o. Wbimpole (Fur- | Lee v. Browne (F D, C) consideration) Clements o. Pulman (Cause) ther consideration)

Henbrough v. Atkinson (M Perry v. Walker (E, FD, C) Yeates v. Roberts (M for dec.) Elder v. Maclean (3) (E, FD, for decree)

Finch v. Carey (M for decree) Colvin v. Lord (Cause)

Bethell v. Stocks (Cause) Laire v. Parkın (Cause) Maybery v. Brooking (Reh.) Barton v. Dixon (7) (F D, C) Wheatley v. Purser (Further Farndell v. Gibbs (M for dec.) Upton o. Forster (Cause) Mott o. Jollye (Cause)

consideration)

Thomson o. Virgoe (Cause) Sh
Welton v. Cracknell (M for Kent v. Porter (Cause) Wickenden v. Rayson (Further Weston v. Tompson (Cause)
decree)
Greenwood o. Taylor (5) (E, consideration)

Hunt v. Hunt (CI)
F D, C)

Goff o. Walters (M for decree) Stockin v. Lane (Cause) Thompson o. Jeves (Cause) Lea v. Grundy (Subsequent | Brayshaw v. Preston (Cause) Sammers v. Summers (CI) Hitchman v. Stewar y cons.) Brierly v. Furnival (M for de. Roberts v. Vercoe (Cause)

.

Lea v. Cook FD, C) Symes v. Cust (Cause) Sh Other v. Ireson (M for decree) Trail v. Stewart Evans v. Kinsey (Cause)

Gage v. Gage (.) Bowles v. Field (Cause) Marquis of Londonderry v. Plumbe v. Straford (M for de. Houlding v. Cross (Sp. case) Garner v. Moore (Cause)

cree)

Earl Vane (M for decree) cree).

Abberley day sherwin (Cause) Twining o. Holmes }(FC

Gore v. Bowser (3) (E,FD, Ellice v. Rossinie }(Cause)

Adison v. Hadley }(FD, C)

Rumball e: Peachy }(FD,C) Davey v. Harrison (29 (FD.C) Gay ko Tudor (Furíber cons.)

C)

Gough v. Lewis }(Cause)

Kearns v. Doyle }(Cause)

}
}

}

Before Vice-Chancellor Sir W. P. Wood.

COUNTY COURTS REGISTRY.-REDUCTION
Causes, &c.
Derrick v. Derrick (F D, C)

OF FEES.
Mouzin v. Sharp (E to answ.) | Powell v. Griffiths (2) (FD, C)
Forsyth v. Ellice (F D, C) Hills v. Busby (Further cons.)

The Lords Commissioners of her Majesty's Treasury
Same v. Same So Thorp v. Thorp (Cause)
Goodbody o. Ward (Fur. Hibbert v. Balchin (Further have been pleased to order that the following reduced

fees should be taken for searches, &c., namely

consideration) Challis o. Tame (Supp. Cl) Lane v. Niblett (Further con

Table of Fees. Spickernell v. Hotham (É, F

sideration)

For every search for a judgment or petition for D, C)

Hepburn o. Palmer (3) (FurToubman v. Hall (Cause)

protection made at the registry

06 ther consideration) Crosley v. Harwood (6) (FD, Bewley v. Nickels (M for dec.) For forty searches, to be made within two months, Lawton v. King (to be paid in advance)

10 0 Davidson v. Greaves (Cause) Same v. Same

(Cause) For every certificate of search, obtained either Bassano v. Bassano (Sp. case) Thorpe v. Thorpe (M for dec.)

through the Clerk of the Court or by a letter Gilman o. Tucker (Sp. case) Goodwin v. Lee (M for dec.)

to the Registrar.... Malden o. Maine (Cause) Wright v. Kitchin (CI) For having the record of any judgment removed Tee v. Ferris (Cause)

Edwards v. Kennedy (M for from the register, (to be paid to the Clerk of
Capel 0. Westminster Im-

decree)
the Court)

16 provement Commissioners Lea v. Church (Cause)

The registry of county courts judgments was esta(Cause)

Yeoman v. Chawcraft (Further blished to afford to traders a ready means of ascertaining Gregory v. Taylor (Cause) consideration)

the solvency of parties, and to enable executors and Hawkins o. Batchelor (M for Bell v. Adams (M for decree) administrators to discover what judgment debts they decree)

Remnant o. Smallpiece (CI) are bound to satisfy.
Brett o. Lethbridge (Sp. case) Earl of Lonsdale 0. Countess
Hamson v. Olivo (M for dec.) Berchtoldt (Further cons.)

In the registry can be found the name, address, and Graham 0. Guthrie (Cause) Ogden o. Battams (Canse)

occupation of every party against whom a judgment Gray v. Smith (2) (Cause) Daines v. Parkinson (CI)

has been recorded since March, 1847, in any of the Law v. London Indisputable Kennett v. Tytherleigh (F D, county courts throughout England and Wales, for 10%. Life Policy Co. (M for dec.) C)

and upwards, and which remains unsatisfied at the Band o. Randle (Cause) Duke of Richmond v. Duncan time the search is made. Attenborough v. Attenborough (M for decree)

INSOLVENCY. (CI)

Milnes v. Wildblood (M for Sands v. Handley (Cl).

decree)

Also the name, last address, and occupation of every Mills v. Birch (M for decree) Henney v. Fenton (F D, C)

party who has applied for protection from his creditors Ramage v. Biddulph (Cause) Hodgson v. Heads M for dec.) to any of the county courts since June, 1854. Baker v. Armitage (M for de. Robertson 0. Newsham (M for cree)

decree) Scott o. Boutley (M for decree) Att.-Gen. v. Mostyn (Cause)

LOCAL AND PERSONAL ACTS, Thompson v. Wedlake (Cause) Coombs o. Baker (Cause) DECLARED PUBLIC, AND TO BE JUDICIALLY NOTICED. Alderson v. Dalton (Cause) Carrington v. Beard (Further

17 & 18 VICTORIÆ.-SESSION 2. Eversfield v. Tisdell (M for consideration) decree)

Turner o. Irlam (M for decree) Lawrie v. Bankes (M for dec.) Beere v. Beere (M for decree)

(Continued from p. 458).
Watson v. Freeman (M for Harvey o. Bulkeley
decree)

CAP. lxxxvii.
Same v. Sturgis

}(Cause) Woodhouse v. Herrick (Spe. Rufford v. Davies (Cause)

An Act to consolidate and extend the Powers of the Accringcial case)

ton Gas and Waterworks Company, and to enable them the Hind v. Poole (Special case) Wale o. Rackstraw (Cause) Cochrane v. St. Clair (Cause)

better to supply with Gas and Water the Townships and Allport v. Stephens (Cause)

Places of Old Accrington, New Accrington, Church, Lower Kelley o. Parker (Cause) Cropper v. Babb (Cause)

Booths, and Huncoat, in the Parish of Whalley, and the Smith v. Cross (CI) Chappell v. Atkinson (M for Palacio v. M‘Knight (M for

Extra-parochial Place of Henbeads, all in the County of decree)

Lancaster, and to sell or lease their Undertaking to the

decree) Bullock 0. Bennett (Sp. case) Webb o. Ledsam (M for dec.)

Local Board of Health for the District of Accrington; and Horsfield v. Ashton (F D, C) Preston o. Raynes (CI).

for other Purposes. Att.-Gen. o. Queen Eliza. Wood v. Grazebrook (M for beth's College (Cause)

CAP. Ixxxvij. decree) Lee v. Head (Special case)

An Act to establish a General Cemetery for the Borough of
Taylor v. Wilkes (Cause)

Doncaster; and for other Purposes.
Desborough v. Harris (Cause) Savage v. Wilkins (M for dec.)
Phipps o. Kelson (CI) Swallow o. Binns (Sp. case)
James v. Harding (M for dec.) Stephens v. Hotham (Cause)

CAP. Ixxxix.
Sh

Jardine o. Jardine (M. for de. An Act to extend the Powers of the Commissioners of Sewers Goodlad o. Burnett (Further cree)

for the Levels of Havering, Dagenham, and otber Places, consideration) Lecoy v. Mogford (Cause)

and to enable them to construct Sewers in the Parishes of Powell v. South Wales Rail Bartlett v. Salmon (M for de

West Ham, East Ham, and North Woolwich. way Co. (E, F D, C)

cree) Gibbons v. Gibbons (2) (F D, Fowler o. Bayldon (Further

CAP. xc. C)

consideration, M)

An Act for the better supplying with Water the Parliamentary Re Irvine

. . Bohun v. Smith (dec.) Burgh or Town of Hamilton, and Suburbs thereof. Jones o. Jones (2) (Further Goddard o. Haslam (M for

CAP. xci. consideration)

decree) Winch v. Winch (Farther con. Milligan v. Earl of Hardwicke An Act to incorporate the Birmingham and Midland Institute, sideration)

to define its Constitution, and to enable the Council of the

(M for decree) Wigan o. Rowland (Further Gough v. Pritchard (CI)

Borough of Birmingham to grant a Site for the Institate

Buildings.
consideration)
Hodson o. Cash (M for dec.)

CAP. xcii,
An Act for improving the Harbour of Blyth, in the County of

Northumberland, and for constructing Docks there; and
for other Purposes.

}

« ZurückWeiter »