The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial ReviewOxford University Press, 10.06.2004 - 376 Seiten In this groundbreaking interpretation of America's founding and of its entire system of judicial review, Larry Kramer reveals that the colonists fought for and created a very different system--and held a very different understanding of citizenship--than Americans believe to be the norm today. "Popular sovereignty" was not just some historical abstraction, and the notion of "the people" was more than a flip rhetorical device invoked on the campaign trail. Questions of constitutional meaning provoked vigorous public debate and the actions of government officials were greeted with celebratory feasts and bonfires, or riotous resistance. Americans treated the Constitution as part of the lived reality of their daily existence. Their self-sovereignty in law as much as politics was active not abstract. |
Inhalt
3 | |
9 | |
2 A Rule Obligatory Upon Every Department THE ORIGINS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW | 35 |
THE MAKING OF THE CONSTITUTION | 73 |
ACCEPTING JUDICIAL REVIEW | 93 |
REJECTING JUDICIAL SUPREMACY | 128 |
THE CHANGING CONTEXT OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW | 145 |
THE LESSONS OF EXPERIENCE | 170 |
THE CONTINUING STRUGGLE FOR POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM | 207 |
POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM CIRCA 2004 | 227 |
JUDICIAL REVIEW WITHOUT JUDICIAL SUPREMACY | 249 |
Notes | 255 |
339 | |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review Larry D. Kramer Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2004 |
The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review Larry D. Kramer Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2004 |
The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review Larry Kramer Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2004 |
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
Alexander Hamilton amendment American Revolution argued argument Buren Carolina century colonial common law Congress constitutional law customary constitution debate decide decision declare democracy democratic departmental theory DHRC Dred Scott early eighteenth-century election enforce essays explained federal Federalist fundamental law Gazette Glorious Revolution Hamilton History interpretation issue Jackson James Iredell James Madison James Wilson John Adams Joseph Story judges judicial authority judicial review judicial supremacy judiciary jury Justices lawyers legislative legislature Letter from Thomas limited Madison's notes Marbury Marshall Marshall’s Massachusetts matter means ment opinion ordinary law Papers of Madison party people’s political popular constitutionalism popular sovereignty practice principles question Rakove Ratifying Convention reason Reid repeal Republic Republicans responsibility role rule Senate Speech Spencer Roane statute supra note supra note 26 Supreme Court t]he Thomas Jefferson tion U.S. 3 Dall unconstitutional United veto views void Whig William
Verweise auf dieses Buch
Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review Christopher F. Zurn Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2007 |