ALICE E. VAN EPPS as Administratrix, etc., (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 617.) OXFORD & COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Petitioner, v. UNION BANK OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA. [Nos. 705, 706.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 618.) Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. See same case below, 143 Fed. 193. April 30, 1906. Denied. WILLIAM E. BARBER, Claimant, etc., Petitioner, v. BERNARD GUINAN. [No. 710.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 618.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 143 Fed. 869. Pennie for respondent. April 30, 1906. Denied: the Second Circuit. Messrs. James J. Macklin and LaRoy 8. Gove for petitioner. No opposition. April 30, 1906. Denied. GOAT & SHEEP SKIN IMPORT Co. Petitioncr, Mr. Edward S. Hatch for petitioner. The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent. April 30, 1906. Granted. [No. WILLIAM E. BARBER, Claimant, etc., Petitioner, v. MICHAEL F. KILFOYLE. 711.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 618.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Messrs. James J. Macklin and LaRoy S. Gove for petitioner. No opposition. April 30, 1906. Denied. 1173 HENRY E. FRANKENBERG Co., Petitioner, v. CHARLES M. NEWTON, Receiver, etc., et al., UNITED STATES. [No. 698.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 619.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mr. Frederick W. Brooks for petitioner. The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent. April 30, 1906. Granted. UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. G. FALK & BROTHER. [No. 702.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 619.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for petitioner. Petitioners, v. CHOCTAW & MEMPHIS RAILBOAD COMPANY et al. [No. 723.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 620.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. See same case below, 140 Fed. 225. Messrs. U. M. Rose, John McClure, G. B. Rose, and W. E. Hemingway for petitioners. Messrs. W. F. Evans, John M. Moore, and M. A. Low, for respondents. May 14, 1906. Denied. LOUIS A. CELLA et al., Petitioners, v. JAMES BROWN et al. [No. 725.] (See S. C. Keporter's ed. 620.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Messrs. Edward S. Hatch and J. S. Tomp- the Eighth Circuit. kins for respondents. April 30, 1906. Granted. GOODYEAR SHOE MACHINERY COMPANY OF PORTLAND, MAINE, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN DANCEL et al., Administrators, etc. [No. 643.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 619.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 144 Fed. 679. Messrs. Edwards H. Childs and L. D. Brandeis for petitioner. Messrs. J. Philip Berg and Roger Foster for respondents. May 14, 1906. Denied. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CAMILLA B. TALBOTT, Administratrix, etc. [No. 700.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 619.) - Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See same case below, 142 Fed. 694. Mr. Maurice E. Locke for petitioner. No opposition. May 14, 1906. Denied. See same case below, 144 Fed. 742. Messrs. Henry W. Bond and Wm. C. Marshall for petitioners. ALBERT H. BROWN et al., Petitioners, v. WESTERN ASSURANCE COMPANY OF TORONUNITED STATES. [No. 716.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 620.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. See same case below, 143 Fed. 60. The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent. May 14, 1906. Denied. TO, CANADA, Petitioner, v. MORGAN CITY IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, LIMITED. [No. 733.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 621.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Mr. Lamar C. Quintero for petitioner. May 14, 1906. Denied.. HENRY B. F. MACFARLAND et al., etc., Peti- | MARY V. CORTELYOU et al., Petitioners, v. tioners, v. LE ROY D. WALTER et al. [No. 727.] CHARLES ENEU JOHNSON & Co. [No. 750.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 622.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mr. Edmund Wetmore for petitioners. IRONCLAD MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. ORANGE COUNTY MILK AssoCIATION [No. 753]; IRONCLAD MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DairyMEN'S MANUFACTURING COMPANY [No. 754].. (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 623.) Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 143 Fed. 512. Mr. Andrew Foulds, Jr., for petitioner. Messrs. Henry D. Williams and Richard L. Sweezy for respondents. May 21, 1906. Denied. MARCUS K. BITTERMAN et al., Petitioners, | OZAN LUMBER CO., Petitioner, v. UNION v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. [No. 755.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 623.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Messrs. Louis Marshall, H. L. Lazarus, and M. Rosenthal for petitioners. Messrs. George Denegre and Joseph Paxton Blair for respondent. May 21, 1906. Granted." COUNTY NATIONAL BANK. [No. 761.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 623.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Messrs. U. M. Rose and T. C. McRae for petitioner. Mr. Morris M. Cohn for respondent. WILLIAM T. WAGGONER et al., Petitioners, v. BANK OF AMERICA et al. [No. 606.] See same case below, 143 Fed. 53. GEORGETOWN & TENNALLYTOWN RAILWAY (Dee S. C. Reporter's ed. 624.) In Error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. See same case below, 25 App. D. C. 259. Mr. J. J. Darlington for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. April 23, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error. DRAKE & STRATTON COMPANY, LIMITED, Plaintiff in Error, v. JOHN MANWARING. [No. 231.] (See S. C. Keporter's ed. 624.) In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. FRANCISCO RIVERA alias PANCHETO, Appellant, v. JosÉ URRUTIA, Warden, etc. [No. 768.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 624.) Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico. The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for appellee. May 28, 1906. Docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Solicitor GenSee same case below, 93 Minn. 497, 102 eral Hoyt for the appellee. N. W. 1134. Mr. Thomas J. Davis for plaintiff in error. Mr. Roger S. Powell for defendant in WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in error. April 18, 1906. Dismissed, per stipulation. MARY JOSEPHINE SCANNELL et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. COTE BLANCHE COMPANY et al. [No. 243.] (See S. C. Reporter's ed. 624.) In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Error, v. JAMES HENDRIX [No. 94.] In Error to the St. Louis Court of Appeals, State of Missouri. Mr. W. H. Blodgett for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendants in error. October 10, 1905. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in er ror. See same case below, 114 La. 385, 38 So. Bainbridge W. BURDICK, Petitioner, v. WIL 279. Mr. Branch K. Miller for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Alex. Porter Morse, M. J. Foster, and C. R. Beattie for defendants in error. April 18, 1906. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the Tenth Rule. LIAM DILLON et al. [No. 647.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Mr. Selden Bacon for petitioner. Mr. Henry V. Cunningham in opposition. APPENDIX I Supreme Court of the United States. OCTOBER TERM, 1905. ORDER. Ordered: That general order in bankruptcy No. 35 be amended by adding the Following sentence to subdivision 4: He may also, pending such proceedings, both n voluntary and involuntary cases, order the commissions of referees and trustees o be paid immediately after such commissions accrue and are earned. December, 11, 1905. APPENDIX II. Supreme Court of the United States. OCTOBER TERM, 1905. ORDER. It is ordered by the court that paragraph 4 of rule 9 be, and the same is hereby, amended so as to read as follows: 4. In all cases where the period of thirty, days is mentioned in rule 8, it shall be extended to sixty days in writs of error and appeals from California, Oregon, Nevada. Washington, New Mexico, Utah, Arizona, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Alaska, Idaho, Hawaii, and Porto Rico, and to one hundred and twenty days from the Philippine Islands. |