Über dieses Buch
Meine Mediathek
Bücher bei Google Play
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER XI.
Affairs of France-Weak and Impolitic Conduct of the French
Ministers-Powers of the Parliaments-Defined by Louis
the Sixteenth-Their opposition to the King-Their ille-
gal pretensions-Beneficial plan of the Ministry-Frustrated
by the Parliament of Paris-Bed of justice at Versailles→→
The Nobility and Clergy support the Parliament against
their Sovereign-Domestic Concerns-The King's Illness
-Parliament assemble-Adjourn for a fortnight---General
summons of the members ordered---Examination of the
King's Physicians by the Privy Council---their re-examina-
tion by a Committee of the House of Commons---Mr.
Pitt proposes to appoint a Committee to search for prece-
dents---Opposed by Mr. Fox, who asserts the Prince's
Right to the Regency---The Claim of Right resisted by
Mr. Pitt, who insists on the necessity of a formal decision
on the subject by Parliament---Supported by Mr. Fox---
Debates on the same question in the House of Lords---
Explanatory speech of Mr. Fox---answered by Mr. Pitt,
who states the outline of his proposed plan for the Regency
---Mr. Pitt's Conduct justified---Proceedings in the House
of Lords---Speech of the Duke of York deprecating the
discussion of the question of Right---Debate in the
Commons on the question of Right, and on the plan of
the Regency---Mr. Pitt's Speech on the subject---Asserts
the Right of Parliament to appoint a Regent, and to define
his powers---Controverts the principles advanced by Lord
Loughborough---Moves Three Resolutions---Lord North
moves an Amendment---reprobates the alleged right of
Parliament, as a violation of the Constitution, and refers to
the Revolution for a precedent---Reflections on his
speech, and the applicability of his precedent examined...
Smollet's Comments on the proceedings in 1688.---His
notions of the Constitution proved to be erroneous and
absurd---Plan of proceeding proposed, different from the
plans suggested by either party---Able Speech of Mr. Fox---
defends himself against the charge of Inconsistency---Mr.
Pitt's reply---Lord North's motion negatived by the
House---and Mr. Pitt's Resolutions carried---Farther De-
bates---Mr. Fox examines the applicability of the prece-
dent of the Revolution to the case of the Regency---Is
answered by Mr. Pitt---The Solicitor-General asserts the
Right claimed for the Prince to be illegal---Mr. Fox urges a
strong objection to the proposed plan of Proceeding---
Majority of seventy-three in favour of Mr. Pitt's proposi-
tions---Discussions in the House of Lords ---Resolutions
carried by a large majority---Mr. Pitt communicates his
plan of the Regency to the Prince of Wales, in a letter, in
obedience to the Prince's commands---The Prince's an-
swer---Observations thereon.
CHAPTER XII.
opens
Different opinions of the Physicians relative to the probable
duration of his Majesty's malady-Discussions on the
Regency resumed-Another examination of the King's
Physicians, by a Committee of the House, ordered on
the motion of Mr. Lovedon-Mr. Pitt his proposed
plan of restrictions on the Regent-Examines the grounds
of the opposite opinions entertained by two of the King's
Physicians-Reminds the House that they were not about
to place a King upon the Throne--Distinguishes the
powers of a Regent from those of a King - Urges the
necessity of establishing a constitutional precedent-Re-
flections on the subject-Restrictions justified, not only
on general principles, but on the recorded sentiments and
opinions of the men who were destined to be Ministers of
the Regent-Personal Character of the Regent not a
proper criterion for the regulation of his powers-Mr.
Pitt proposes to prevent the Regent from creating Peers-
His reasons for the proposal-His restrictions respecting
the grant of places and pensions-Respecting the King's
personal property-Proposes to entrust the care of the
King's person, and the management of the Royal House-
hold, to the Queen; and to move a Council of Advice
to assist the Queen in the discharge of her trust-His
resolutions violently opposed by Mr. Powis-Ridiculed by
Mr. Sheridan-Censured by Mr. Fullarton, whose mis-
representation of French History is corrected-Supported
by Lord Belgrave-Able Speech of Mr. William (now
Lord) Grenville, in favour of them-The first four reso-
lutions carried-Debate postponed-Mr. Pitt's Speech in
defence of the fifth resolution-Disclaims all views of
factious opposition to the Regent's Administration-
Violent speech of Lord Maitland; he libels the People of
England-Misstates the ground of the argument-Objects
to trust the King's person to the Queen-Probable motives
of such objection-Objection supported by Mr. Grey-
Resolutions supported by Mr. Dundas and Mr. Pulteney-
Opposed by Mr. Fox-Denies that the King's Political
Character continues to subsist during his natural life—
The state and splendour of the Regent a national concern
-Resolution carried by a majority of fifty-six.-Mr.
Rolle revives the subject of the reported marriage of the
Prince of Wales with Mrs. Fitzherbert-Called to order
by Sir Francis Basset-Necessity of the investigation
affirmed from the penal disqualifications attached to such
marriage if it had really taken place-Resolutions pass in
the Commons-Proceedings in the House of Lords-
Agree to the Resolutions-Mr. Pitt proposes to submit the
Resolutions to the Prince of Wales; and defends himself
against some imputations of disrepect to the Prince,
which had been urged against him by Mr. Burke and Mr.
Grey-Asserts the existence of a Duty to his King and
Country paramount to all considerations of respect to the
Prince-Joint resolutions of the two Houses laid before
the Prince and the Queen-Answer of the Prince and of
the Queen.-Earl Camden proposés a commission, under
the great seal, for giving the Royal assent to the Bill-
A better mode of proceeding suggested-His Lordship
justifies the proposal by precedents from English History
--
The Princes of the Blood desire their names may be
erased from the commission-Mr. Pitt brings in the
Regency Bill-Opposed, on the second reading, by Mr.
Burke His intemperate language-Is called to order by
Mr. Pitt-Mr. Rolle proposes a clause for excluding from
the Regency any person proved to be married, either in
law or in fact, to a Papist, or one of the Roman Catholic
persuasion Clause opposed by Lord Belgrave-Reasons
for an Enquiry into the business-Mr. Wellbore Ellis
contends, that the Act of the present King, which annuls
all marriages of the Royal Family, without the Royal
Assent, decided the question, as that could not be true
in fact which was not good in law-The imputed effect of
this Act denied-Mr. Ellis's inference adopted by Lord
North, Mr. Sheridan, and others-Silence of the Crown
Lawyers on the subject-Inference resisted by Mr. Dundas,
who maintains that the penalties of the Act of Settlement
still subsist-Mr. Rolle proposes to withdraw his motion
-Is ridiculed by Mr. Courtenay-Reviled by Mr. Grey—
Mr. Grey's intemperance censured by Mr. Pitt.-Debates
on the Queen's Council pursued-Mr. Burke is again
called to order-Lord North censures Mr. Pitt for not
introducing the names of the Princes of the Blood, and
moves for the insertion of their names in the list-His
motion resisted by Mr. Pitt, who explains the grounds of
their exclusion-Motion rejected by the House--Mr. Pitt
defends the means proposed by him for making known the
Recovery for the King, and the resumption of the Royal
power-Inconsistency of the Opposition-Extraordinary
Speech of Mr. Burke-Restrictions on the creation of
Peers limited to Three Years--Bill carried to the Lords-
All further proceedings stopped by the King's restoration