 An employer is not bound to indemnify his employee for losses suffered by the latter in consequence of the ordinary risks of the business in which he is employed, nor in consequence of the negligence of another person employed by the same employer in...  California Appellate Decisions - Seite 383von California. District Courts of Appeal - 1906Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
 | New York (State). Commissioners of the Code - 1862 - 550 Seiten
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business,1 unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee.' 1 Sherman r. Rochester and Syracuse RR, 17 NYt 156; Russell ». Hudson River RR, id., 136; Coon «.... | |
 | New York (State). Commissioners of the Code - 1862 - 538 Seiten
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business,1 unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee.1 1 Sherman v. Rochester and Syracuse RR, 17 NY, 156 ; Russell ». Hudson River RR, id., 136;... | |
 | New York (State). Commissioners of the Code, New York (State). - 1865 - 896 Seiten
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business,1 unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee.* 1 Sherman v. Rochester A, Syracuse RR, 17 NY, 166; Russell v. Hudson River RR, id., 136; Coon v. Syracuse... | |
 | 1868 - 894 Seiten
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable, employee." The rule, as stated, was adhered to in Armstrong v. Catawissa Railroad, 13 Wright 186, but not extended... | |
 | Edward P. Weeks - 1879 - 368 Seiten
...negligence of anofher person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee. 1 To such cases the rule of respondeat superior does not apply, unless there has been want of ordinary... | |
 | Thomas Beven - 1881 - 188 Seiten
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, (a) unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employe." (b) Article 1,007: "An employer must in all cases indemnify his employe' for losses caused... | |
 | 1888 - 1450 Seiten
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employe.'" And: "But, gentlemen, if you find from the evidence that the defendant company was guilty... | |
 | 1906 - 1148 Seiten
...the business in which he is employed, nor in consequence of the negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business,...performance of a duty the employer owes by law to the employe, or unless the employer has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable... | |
 | 1914 - 1230 Seiten
...that was quoted, and is as follows: "Nor in consequence of the negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business,...injury was committed in the performance of a duty Ihe employer owes by law to the employé, or unless the employer has neslected to use ordinary care... | |
| |
