The Price of Peace: Just War in the Twenty-First Century
Lively political and public debates on war and morality have been a feature of the post-Cold War world. The Price of Peace argues that a re-examination of the just war tradition is therefore required. The authors suggest that despite fluctuations and transformations in international politics, the just war tradition continues to be relevant. However they argue that it needs to be reworked to respond to the new challenges to international security represented by the end of the Cold War and the impact of terrorism. With an interdisciplinary and transatlantic approach, this volume provides a dialogue between theological, political, military and public actors. By articulating what a reconstituted just war tradition might mean in practice, it also aims to assist policy-makers and citizens in dealing with the ethical dilemmas of war.
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
achieved Afghanistan aggression al-Qaeda American Anne-Marie Slaughter argues argument armed force attack authorisation authority battleﬁeld beneﬁts British cause chapter Christian churches civilian Cold War combat concept conﬂict criteria debate decision defence deﬁned deﬁnition democratic peace difﬁcult doctrine effect effects-based warfare enemy ethical Europe evil ﬁght ﬁghting ﬁnd ﬁrst framework George Weigel global Gulf War human rights human security humanitarian intervention inﬂuence insurgents international common international law Iraq Iraq War Islamic James Turner Johnson judgement jus ad bellum jus in bello justice justiﬁed kill Kosovo last resort legitimate means ment Michael Walzer military action military force moral Muslims non-combatants operations organisations paciﬁsm political possible pre-emptive principle question reason recognised reﬂection requires responsibility right intention rogue regimes rules Rwanda Security Council self-defence signiﬁcant speciﬁc strategic sufﬁcient target terrorism terrorists thinking threat tion tradition troops United Nations unjust war tradition wars
Seite 293 - No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory.
Seite 43 - The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively.
Seite 203 - This unfortunate event, it is to be hoped, will in future prevent ministers from pretending to direct operations of war in a country at three thousand miles distance, of which they have so little knowledge as not to be able to distinguish between good, bad, or interested advices, or to give positive orders...
Seite 43 - While the United States will constantly strive to enlist the support of the international community, we will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary, to exercise our right of self-defense by acting preemptively against such terrorists, to prevent them from doing harm against our people and our country; and denying further sponsorship, support, and sanctuary to terrorists by convincing or compelling states to accept their sovereign responsibilities.
Seite 54 - Union, including the eventual framing of a common defence policy, which might in time lead to a common defence.
Seite 254 - I mean the fundamental freedom of each individual, enshrined in the charter of the UN and subsequent international treaties — has been enhanced by a renewed and spreading consciousness of individual rights. When we read the charter today, we are more than ever conscious that its aim is to protect individual human beings, not to protect those who abuse them....