Parties, Politics, and the Sectional Conflict in Tennessee, 1832-1861
Univ. of Tennessee Press, 1997 - 371 Seiten
Tennessee's fiercely competitive two-party politics during the late antebellum era roused extraordinary popular interest and molded leaders of national stature. Better than any previous historian, Jonathan Atkins explains why voters in the Volunteer State responded so enthusiastically to partisan appeals. -- Daniel W. Crofts, Trenton State CollegeIn this thought-provoking study, Jonathan M. Atkins provides a fresh look at the partisan ideological battles that marked the political culture of antebellum Tennessee. He argues that the legacy of party politics was a key factor in shaping Tennessee's hesitant course during the crisis of Union in 1860-61.Between the Jacksonian era and the outbreak of the Civil War, Atkins demonstrates, the competition between Democrats and Whigs in Tennessee was as heated as any in the country. The conflict centered largely on differing conceptions of republican liberty and each party's contention that the other posed a serious threat to that liberty. As the slavery question pushed to the forefront of national politics, Tennessee's parties absorbed the issue into the partisan tumult that already existed. Both parties pledged to defend southern interests while preserving the integrity of the Union. Appeals for the defense of liberty and Union interests proved effective with voters and profoundly influenced the state's actions during the secession crisis. The belief that a new national Union party could preserve the Union while checking the Lincoln administration encouraged voters initially to reject secession. With the outbreak of war, however, West and Middle Tennesseans chose to accept disunion to avoid what they saw as coercion and military despotismby the North. East Tennesseans, meanwhile, preferred loyalty to the Union over membership in a Southern confederacy dominated by a slaveholding aristocracy.No previous book has so clearly detailed the role of party politics and ideology in Tennessee's early history. As Atkins shows, the ideological debate helps to explain not only the character and survival of Tennessee's party system but also the persistent strength of unionism in a state that ultimately joined the Southern cause.
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
accept administration American Andrew Jackson Andrew Johnson Appeal argued Assembly attempt bank Bell bill Brown Buren called Campbell Papers candidate carry cause charged citizens claimed Clarksville Clay compromise Congress Constitution continued convention counties crisis David defend delegates Democrats division East Tennessee economic election electorate encouraged favor federal force governor Harris Henry hope House issue Jackson James John Jones Journal July June Knoxville leaders legislature maintained majority meeting Memphis Middle Nashville Republican Banner Nashville Union Nashville Whig national bank nomination North northern opponents opposition party party's pass percent political politicians Polk popular position presented president presidential Press principles question represented resolutions result Senate Sept session slave slavery South southern southern rights stand state's Tennes Tennessee's territories tion True Union and American Unionists United vote voters Weaver West Whig White William
Seite 348 - May 8 the committee submitted its report, together with two bills, one to admit California as a State, to establish territorial governments for Utah and New Mexico, and making proposals to Texas for the establishment of her western and northern boundaries, and the other to suppress the slave trade in the District of Columbia.
Alle Ergebnisse von Google Books »
A Perfect War of Politics: Parties, Politicians, and Democracy in Louisiana ...
John M. Sacher
Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2003