| Elizabeth C. Benton - 1994 - 252 Seiten
...Circuit has declared that an infringer with actual notice of a patent has an affirmative duty to 3. Underwater Devices, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen, Co., 717 F.2d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1983). 4. 35 USCA § 282 (West 1984 & Supp. 1993). ("A patent shall be presumed valid . . . . The burden of... | |
| Thomas Dreier - 2002 - 700 Seiten
...patentverletzend ist; das schließt die Verpflichtung zur Konsultierung eines Patentanwaltes mit ein; vgl. zB Underwater Devices Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., 717 F.2d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1983); Central Soya Co., Inc. v. Geo A. Hormel & Co., 723 F.2d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1983), sowie die Nachweise... | |
| Thronson, Roth, Grossman - 1403 Seiten
...filed to allege that the defendant's infringement was willful." See Empirical Statistics on Willful Patent Infringement, 15 Fed. Cir. BJ 227 (2004). Additional...Underwater Devices, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Ill F.2d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1983). The decision speaks of an accused infringer having an affirmative duty... | |
| Hugh B. Wellons - 2007 - 1016 Seiten
...F.2d 1 101, 1 1 10 (Fed. Cir. 1986); Bott v. Four Star Corp., 807 F.2d 1567, 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1986); Underwater Devices, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., 717 F.2d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1983). 160. Underwater Devices, 111 F.2d at 1389-90. 161. Id. at 1390. 162. Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible... | |
| |