Finlay, Right Honorable Sir Robert Bannatyne-Continued.

Question 5-Continued.

Azuni, 1:205, maritime jurisdiction, 429.

Baker, Bathurst to, Sept. 7, 1815, B. C. Ap., 64, maritime jurisdiction, 3-mile
limit, bays, 413.

Bathurst to Baker, Sept. 7, 1815, B. C. Ap., 64, maritime jurisdiction, 3-mile
limit, bays, 413.

Bay: Bathurst to Baker, Sept. 7, 1815, B. C. Ap., 64, 413. Biscay Bay, 434,
439. British contention, 407. British have always exercised jurisdiction
over, 467. British position as to, always the same, 467. Chaleurs Bay, 417,
438. Chesapeake Bay, 411, 438, 447. Delaware, 411, 438. Hudson Bay,
439, 444. In a class by themselves as to jurisdiction, 466. In treaty of
1783 includes all bays, 411. Kent, p. 97, 416. Miramichi Bay, 438. Not
defined, Adams to American commissioners, July 28, 1818, B. C. Ap., 84,
414; Adams to Russell, 1822, B. C. C. Ap., 163, and May 3, 1822, B. C.
C. Ap., 161, 413. "Of His Majesty's dominions" is purely geographical
expression, 418. Spezia Bay, 439. Treaty of 1794, B. C. Ap., 23, 412.
United States contention as to, 17-18, 407. Wheaton, 417. See Maritime
jurisdiction.

Bays on Nova Scotia coast, 408-9.

Behring Sea case, British position, maritime jurisdiction, 457.

Biscay, Bay of, 434, 439.

Bishop, sec. 105, maritime jurisdiction, 438.

Blackburn's opinion in Conception Bay case, 415.

Bluntschli, sec. 309, maritime jurisdiction, 444.

Bonfils, 299, maritime jurisdiction, 455.

British contention, 407.

British have always exercised jurisdiction over bays, 467.

British position as to bays always same, 467.

Burlamaqui, vol. 3, ch. 8, art. IX, maritime jurisdiction, 425.

Bynkershoek, ch. 2, maritime jurisdiction, 425.

Calvo, T., secs. 353, 355, 356, 357, 367, maritime jurisdiction, 450.
Cape Breton, 409.

De Casaregis, maritime jurisdiction, 425.

Cases cited: "Alleganean," 4 Moore's Int. Arb. 4333, 447. Conception
Bay case, L. R. 2 App. Cases (1877) 394, 415. Moray Firth, 1906, 457-9.
Queen v. Cunningham, Bell's Crown Cases Reserved 72, maritime jurisdic-
tion, 434-437. Queen v. Keyn, L. R. (1876) 2d Ex. Div. 63, maritime
jurisdiction, 440.

Cauchy, maritime jurisdiction, 437.

Chaleurs Bay: 417, 438. Lyman, 2:100, 417.

Channel, St. George's, 444.

Chesapeake Bay, 411, 438, 449.

Chitty, maritime jurisdiction, 430.

Conception Bay case, L. R. 2 App. Cases (1877) 894, 415.

Continental Congress: Committee report, 1782, B. C. C. Ap., 29, 3-league
limit, 410. Resolution of, 1779, B. C. C. Ap., 20, 3 league limit, 410.
Commissioner's instructions regarding commercial treaty with Great Britain,
1779, B. C. C. Ap., 23, 3-league limit, 410.

Cunningham, Queen v., Bell's Crown Cases Reserved, 72, maritime jurisdic-
tion, 434-437.

de Cussy, 1856, 1:91, 97, sec. 41, maritime jurisdiction, 433.

Dana's argument, 1877, Halifax arbitration, maritime jurisdiction, 443.
Delaware Bay: 411, 438. Wheaton, 417.

Despagnet, sec. 413, maritime jurisdiction, 451.

Finlay, Right Honorable Sir Robert Bannatyne-Continued.
Question 5-Continued.

Farnham, p. 25, maritime jurisdiction, 454.

Field, p. 15, maritime jurisdiction, 440.

Fiore, T., maritime jurisdiction, 438-9.

FITZPATRICK: right of Americans to enter bays, 422.
France, treaties of. See Treaties cited.

Fuca Straits and Oregon boundary arbitration: maritime jurisdiction, 455;
treaty providing for, 1846, B. C. Ap., 32, 455.
Galiani, maritime jurisdiction, 426–7.

Godey, maritime jurisdiction, 452.

Great Britain, treaties of. See Treaties cited.

Grotius, Bk. 2, ch. 3, sec. 7, 8, maritime jurisdiction, 424.

Gulf of Mexico, 444.

Gulf of St. Lawrence, 409.

Halifax arbitration, 1877: Dana's argument, maritime jurisdiction, 443.

Hall, p. 154, maritime jurisdiction, 454.

Halleck, 1:67, 191, maritime jurisdiction, 441, 454.

Hautefeuille, 1:57, maritime jurisdiction, 434.

Hecate Straits case, maritime jurisdiction, 464-6.
Holtzendorff, 2:458, maritime jurisdiction, 450.

Hudson Bay, 439, 444.

Imbart-Latour, ch. 1, sec. 3, ch. 2, sec. 3, maritime jurisdiction, 450.
Institut de Droit International, 1894, 1895, maritime jurisdiction, 452.
International law writers cited: Azuni, 1:205, 429. Bishop, sec. 105, maritime
jurisdiction, 438. Blackburn's opinion in Conception Bay case, 415.
Bluntschli, sec 309, maritime jurisdicton, 444. Bonfils, 299, maritime juris-
diction, 455. Burlamaqui, vol. 3, ch. 8, art. IX, maritime jurisdiction, 425;
Bynkershoek, ch. 2, maritime jurisdiction, 425. Calvo, T., secs. 353, 355, 356,
357, 367, maritime jurisdiction, 450. De Casaregis, maritime jurisdiction,
425. Cauchy, maritime jurisdiction, 437. Chitty, maritime jurisdiction,
430. de Cussy, 1:91, 97, sec. 41, maritime jurisdiction, 433. Despagnet,
sec. 413, maritime jurisdiction, 451. Farnham, p. 25, maritime jurisdiction,
454. Field, p. 15, maritime jurisdiction, 440. Fiore, T., maritime jurisdic-
tion, 438-9. Galiani, maritime jurisdiction, 426-7. Godey, maritime juris-
diction, 452. Grotius, Bk. 2, ch. 3, sec. 7, 8, maritime jurisdiction, 424. Hall,
p. 154, maritime jurisdiction, 454. Halleck, 1:167, 191, maritime jurisdic-
tion, 441, 454. Hautefeuille, 1:57 maritime jurisdiction, 434. Holtzendorff,
2:468, maritime jurisdiction, 450. Imbart-Latour, ch. 1, sec. 3, ch. 2, sec. 3,
maritime jurisdiction, 450. Kent, maritime jurisdiction, bays, 416-17.
Klüber, sec. 130, 131, maritime jurisdiction, 430–431. Lapradelle, Revue gén-
érale de droit international public, vol. 5, maritime jurisdiction, 453. Lyman,
2:100, 417. G. F. von Martens, sec. 40, 41, 42, maritime jurisdiction, 428-9.
Massé, maritime jurisdiction, 431-432. Mérignhac, maritime jurisdiction,
454. Nys, maritime jurisdiction, 453. Oppenheim, 1:246, maritime jurisdic-
tion, 454. Ortolan, Bk. 2, ch. 8, p. 145, 158, maritime jurisdiction, 437. Perels,
pp. 28, 34, maritime jurisdiction, 446. Phillimore, 1:284, maritime juris-
diction, 442. Puffendorf, Bk. 4, ch. 5, sec. 8, maritime jurisdiction, 424.
Rayneval, sec. 10, maritime jurisdiction, 431. Riquelme, maritime jurisdic-
tion, 433. Rivier, maritime jurisdiction, 452. Schücking, maritime juris-
diction, 452. Taylor, sec. 229, maritime jurisdiction, 453. Twiss, p. 293 et
seq., maritime jurisdiction, 445. Vattel, sec. 289, 291, 294, maritime juris-
diction, 425. Westlake, maritime jurisdiction, 454. Wharton, 267, mari-
time jurisdiction, 449. Wheaton, "Bays," King's Chambers, Delaware
Bay, 417. Woolsey, sec. 60, maritime jurisdiction, 450.

Finlay, Right Honorable Sir Robert Bannatyne-Continued.

Question 5-Continued.

Jeffreys' map, 408.

Jurisdiction act of 1878, territorial waters, 441-2.

Jurisdiction, summary of statutes showing exercise of, 468.
Kent: "bays," 416; maritime jurisdiction, 416–17.

Keyn, Queen v., L. R. 1876, 2 Ex. Div. 63, maritime jurisdiction, 440.
King's Chambers, Wheaton, 417.

Klüber, sec. 130, 131, maritime jurisdiction, 430–431.

Lapradelle, Revue générale de droit international public, vol. 5, maritime
jurisdiction, 453.

Lyman, 2: 100, Bay of Chaleur, 417.

Maps, Mitchell's, Jeffreys', 408.

66

Maritime jurisdiction: Alaska Boundary arbitration: British position, 460-
464; not inconsistent with present position, 464. 'Alleganean," case of, 4
Moore's Int. Arb., 4333, 447. Bathurst to Baker, Sept. 7, 1815, B. C. Ap.,
64, 413. British position, Behring Sea case, 457. Dana's argument, 1877,
Halifax arbitration, 443. Definition prior to 1818: Azuni, 1:205, 429;
Burlamaqui, vol. 3, ch. 8, art. IX, 425; Bynkershoek, ch. 2, 425; De
Casaregis, 425; Galiani, 426-7; Grotius, Bk. 2, ch. 3, secs. 7, 8, 424; G. F.
von Martens, secs. 40, 42, 41, 428-9; Puffendorf, Bk. 4, ch. 5, sec. 8, 424;
Vattel, sec. 289, 291, 294, 425–6. Definition since 1818: Bishop, sec. 105,
438; Bluntschli, sec. 309, 444; Bonfils, 299, 455; Calvo, secs. 353, 355,
356, 357, 367, 450; Cauchy, 437; Chitty, 430; de Cussy, 1:91, 97, sec. 41,
433; Despagnet, sec. 413, 451; Farnham, p. 25, 454; Field, p. 15, 440;
Fiore, 438-9; Godey, 452; Hall, 154, 454; Halleck, 1:167, 191, 441, 454;
Hautefeuille, 1:57, 434; Holtzendorff, 2:468, 450; Imbart-Latour, ch. 1,
sec. 3, ch. 2, sec. 3, 450; Klüber, secs. 130, 131, 430-431; Lapradelle, Revue
générale de droit international public, vol. 5, 453; Massé, 431-432; Mérignhac,
454; Nys, 453; Oppenheim, 1:246, 454; Ortolan, Bk. 2, ch. 8, p. 145, 158,
437; Perels, pp. 28, 34, 446; Phillimore, 1:284, 442; Rayneval, sec. 10,
431; Riquelme, 433; Rivier, 452; Schücking, 452; Taylor, sec. 229, 453;
Twiss, 293 et seq., 445; Westlake, 454; Wharton, 267, 449; Woolsey, sec.
60, 450. Encyclopedia of the Laws of England, 455. Institut de Droit
International, 1894, 1895, 452. Hecate Straits case, 464-6. Kent, 416–17;
Moray Firth case, 1906, 457-9. Oregon Boundary and Fuca Straits Arbi-
tration, 455. Treaty providing for, B. C. Ap., 32, 455. Queen v. Cunning-
ham, Bell's Crown Cases Reserved, 72, 434-437. Queen v. Keyn, L. R. 1876,
2 Ex. Div. 63, 440.

G. F. von Martens, secs. 40, 42, 41, maritime jurisdiction, 428-9.

Massé, maritime jurisdiction, 431-432.

Mérignhac, maritime jurisdiction, 454.

Mexico, Gulf of, 444.

Miramichi Bay, 438.

Mitchell's map, 408.

Moray Firth case, 1906, 457-9; does not affect present question, 459.

Nova Scotia coasts, bays on, 408-9.

Nys, maritime jurisdiction, 453.

Oppenheim, 1:246, maritime jurisdiction, 454.

Oregon Boundary and Fuca Straits Arbitration: maritime jurisdiction, 455;

treaty providing for, 1846, B. C. Ap., 32, 455.

Ortolan, Bk. 2, ch. 8, p. 145, 158, maritime jurisdiction, 437.

Paris. See Treaties cited.

Perels, pp. 28, 34, maritime jurisdiction, 446.

Finlay, Right Honorable Sir Robert Bannatyne-Continued.
Question 5-Continued.

Phillimore, 1:284, maritime jurisdiction, 442.

Puffendorf, Bk. 4, ch. 5, sec. 8, maritiine jurisdiction, 424.

Queen v. Cunningham, Bell's Crown Cases Reserved, 72, maritime jurisdic-
tion, 434-437.

Queen v. Keyn, L. R. 2 Ex. Div. 63 (1876), maritime jurisdiction, 440.
Rayneval, sec. 10, maritime jurisdiction, 431.

Right of Americans to enter bays, Fitzpatrick, 422.

Riquelme, maritime jurisdiction, 433.

Rivier, maritime jurisdiction, 452.

Russell, Adams to, 1822, B. C. C. Ap., 163, and May 3, 1822, B. C. C. Ap.,

161, "bays" not defined, 413.

St. George's Channel, 444.

St. Lawrence, Gulf of, 409.

Schücking, maritime jurisdiction, 452.

Seward's speech, 1852, six-mile bays, 423.

"Sight test" of maritime jurisdiction, Bishop, sec. 105, 438.

Six-mile bays: Argument of United States as to, 419-422. Seward's speech,

1852, 423. Theory not sanctioned by international law, 423.

Spain, treaties of. See Treaties cited.

Spezia, Bay of, 439.

Statutes cited: Imperial: Territorial waters jurisdiction act of 1878, 441-2.
Summary of statutes showing exercise of jurisdiction, 468.

Taylor, sec. 229, maritime jurisdiction, 453.

Territorial waters jurisdiction act of 1878, 441-2.

Three-league limit: Commissioner's instructions regarding commercial treaty
with Great Britain, 1779, B. C. C. Ap., 23, 410. Continental Congress, com-
mittee report, 1782, B. C. C. Ap., 29, 410. Resolution of Continental Con-
gress, 1779, B. C. C. Ap., 20, 410.

Three-mile limit: Bathurst to Baker, Sept. 7, 1815, B. C. Ap., 64, 413. Certain
as to general coast-line, 466.

Treaties cited: Utrecht, 1713, Great Britain-France, fishing off Nova Scotia,
B. C. Ap., 6, bays, 409. 1763, Great Britain-France-Spain, B. C. Ap., 7,
varying jurisdictional limits off shore of Gulf of St. Lawrence, Nova
Scotia, Cape Breton, 409-10. 1794, Great Britain-United States, B. C.
Ap., 23, bays, 412.

Twiss, p. 293 et seq., maritime jurisdiction, 445.

United States, contention as to bays, 17-18, 407.

United States, treaties of. See Treaties cited.

Utrecht, Treaty of. See Treaties cited.

Vattel, secs. 289, 291, 294, maritime jurisdiction, 425-6.

Westlake, maritime jurisdiction, 454.

Wharton, 267, maritime jurisdiction, 449.

Wheaton, "bays," King's Chambers, Delaware Bay, 417.
Woolsey, sec. 60, maritime jurisdiction, 450.

Question 6, pp. 20-21, 469. (June 6, 17, 1910.)

Bays not included in liberty of fishing on treaty coast, 469.
"Liberty" of fishing on treaty coast does not include bays, 469.
Treaty coast, bays not included in liberty of fishing on, 469.
Question 7, pp. 21-23, 469-471. (June 6, 17, 1910.)
Commercial privileges, 470.

United States seeks to change question, 469.

Robson, Sir William Snowden.

Question 1, pp. 1593-1722. (July 25, 26, 28, 1910.)

Adams, Bathurst to, Oct. 30, 1815, B. C. Ap., 71, "in common," 1648.
Adams, Rush to, Aug. 12, 1824, U. S. C. C., Ap. 122, "in common,"
Franco-American controversy, 1718.

Adams, Gallatin to, Nov. 6, 1818, B. C. Ap., 97, servitudes, 1659.

Adams to Bathurst, Sept. 25, 1815, B. C. Ap., 67: "in common," 1646; regu-
lation, 1626.

Adams to Rush, June 27, 1823, B. C. Ap., 108, French fishery rights, 1632.
Adams to Russell, May 3, 1822, B. C. C. Ap., 162, fisheries before 1783, 1612.
Alexander, Captain, value of services, 1681.

American contention on divided sovereignty, servitudes, stated and discussed,
1594; based on grant and joint ownership, 1595.
American, Franco-, dispute of, 1821-3, 1629-31.

American independence, effect of, 1624.

Americans abandoned claim to joint sovereignty, 1596.

Bagot, Castlereagh to, Mar. 22, 1817, B. C. C. Ap., 177, servitudes, 1659.
Bagot to Monroe, Nov. 27, 1816, B. C. Ap., 77, regulation, 1627.

Baird's report, Dec. 6, 1852, B. C. C. Ap., 181, regulations necessary, 1605.
Bathurst, Adams to, Sept. 25, 1815, B. C. Ap., 67: "in common," 1646;
regulation, 1626.

Bathurst to Adams, Oct. 30, 1815, B. C. Ap., 71, "in common," 1648.

Bond's attitude, Sir Robert, 1598-1601.

Canadian acts complained of by United States, 1681.

Canning, Rush to, May 3, 1824, B. C. Ap., 110, title of United States to
take fish, 1632.

"' 1644.

Cardwell's letter, Apr. 12, 1866, B. C. Ap., 221, "in common,'
Castlereagh to Bagot, Mar. 22, 1817, B. C. C. Ap., 177, servitudes, 1659.
Chateaubriand, Gallatin to, Apr. 2, 1823, B. C. Ap., 105, reply to French con-
tentions, 1630.

Clauss, competency as authority, 1708-9.

Colombia-United States, treaty of 1909, servitudes, B. C. C. Ap., 3, 207, 1661.
"Common fishery" v. "common of fishery," 1646-7.

"Common sea:" 1607; Derby on, 1608.

Custom in servitudes, 1666, 1668-9, 1682, 1683, 1709.

Dawson, Urrutia to, Mar. 15, 1909, B. C. C. Ap., 207, United States-Columbia
treaty, servitudes, 1662.

Dawson to Urrutia, Mar. 23, 1909, B. C. C. Ap., 207, United States-Columbia
treaty, servitudes, 1662.

Definition of servitude, 1663.

Derby on "common sea," 1608.

Dominium: 1678; Drago, 1676; Fitzpatrick, 1676, 1677; LAMMASCH, 1676–7;
LOHMAN, 1676.

DRAGO: Dominium, imperium, 1676. Effect of servitudes on sovereignty,
1674. Public and private property of state, 1679. Servitudes, French law,
1673.

Economic servitudes, 1655-6.

English writers do not mention servitudes prior to 1818, 1694-5.

Evarts to Welsh: Sept. 27, 1878, O. A. Ap., 2280, Halifax award, 1652-3.
Sept. 28, 1878, U. S. C. Ap., 656-7, Fortune Bay, 1651-2.

Eviction of United States, FITZPATRICK, 1635.

"Exclusive" fishery of France, 1718-20.

"Exclusive right," LAMMASCH, 1719.

Executive acts complained of by United States, 1681, 1721,