Elder, Honorable Samuel J.-Continued. Question 7-Continued. Statutes cited: Imperial: Order in council, 1830, B. C. Ap., 570-1, com- "Touch and trade," 1818 treaty has no application to right to, Manning's Trade from fishing vessel, or fish from trading vessel, LAMMASCH, 1587-8. Trading and fishing, no mention of impropriety of both, Grey to Reid, Feb. Trading and fishing permitted by United States register, 1588. Trading by inhabitants who are fishing, 1582-3. Trading privileges may be exercised by fishing vessels if authorized by Trading rights, general, fishing vessels claim under, right to buy bait and Trading vessels, United States inhabitants entitled to fish from, DRAGO, 1587. West, Bayard to, May 10, 1886, U. S. C. Ap., 764, extension of reciprocal Ewart, John S., K. C. Question 1, pp. 1367-1443. (July 18, 19, 1910.) Adams' diary, Nov. 29, 1782, B. C. C. Ap., 103, "right" to ocean fishery Adams drafted plan 1783 treaty using "liberty," 1376. Adams' Memoirs, Dec. 14, 1814, B. C. C. Ap., 147, treaty right a continua- Adams to Castlereagh, Jan. 22, 1816, B. C. Ap., 74, partition theory, 1433. Adams to Monroe, Sept. 19, 1815, B. C. Ap., 65, partition theory, 1432. Adams to Russell, May 3, 1822, B. C. C. Ap., 156, treaty right a continuance Adams to Thomas, Aug. 10, 1822, U. S. C. Ap., 318: Americans discovered Adams, C. F.: B. C. C. Ap., 105, "right" to ocean fishery and "liberty" to Advantages of British fishermen, geographical and by treaty, 1422. Alaska Packers Association. United States v., 79 Fed. Rep., 152: “in com- Ewart, John S., K. C.-Continued. Question 1-Continued. American commissioners, report of, Dec. 25, 1814, B. C. C. Ap., 150, partition theory, 1432. American, Franco-, controversy, 1404-5. Articles of confederation gave Congress limited authority, 1385. Bait, regulations, imperial statute, 1824, B. C. Ap., 567, GRAY, 1401-2. Boutwell circulars, reason for clause regarding obedience to local regula- British condition in 1782, not helpless, 1374. Canadian regulations, FITZPATRICK, 1407. Canals, right to regulate, 1413. Castlereagh, Adams to, Jan. 22, 1816, B. C. Ap., 74, partition theory, 1433. Colonial charters: Fishing liberties, 1369-71. 1691, Massachusetts charter, Colonial charters, laws regulating fisheries under, B. C. Ap., 770-76, 1370–1. Colonial regulation statutes: Between 1783-1818, 1395-6. 1786, imperial Colonial rights in fishery preserved in 1783 treaty: Livingstone to Washington, Mar. 12, 1783, B. C. C. Ap., 132, 1382. Madison to Randolph, Mar. 12, 1783, B. C. C. Ap., 132, 1383. Colonies not connected governmentally, 1370. Confederation, Articles of, gave Congress limited authority, 1385. Congress, report of committee, 1782, disclaimed right to in-shore fishery, 1372. Construction of treaty, rules, 1368. Cooley, p. 575, right to regulate, 1440. DRAGO: United States position re partition theory, 1428-9. Dunham v. Lamphere, 3 Gray, 268, free fishing to American citizens does not prohibit State regulation, 1391-4. Evarts and Root only objected to regulations, 1439. Evarts-Salisbury correspondence, 1415–20. Evarts to Welsh, Aug. 1, 1879, B. C. Ap., 277, joint regulations, 1425. Exclusion law, LAMMASCH, Forsyth to Stevenson, Feb. 20, 1841, B. C. Ap., 124, 1407. Exclusive, French rights claimed to be, 1404; are not, 1381-2. Exclusive, grant to United States in 1783 not, 1381, 1382. Executive and legislative acts alleged to be violations of treaty, list of requested by tribunal, 1443. Extraterritoriality, Americans claim, 1367. Extraterritoriality, "liberty" is not right of, 1382. Ewart, John S., K. C.-Continued. Question 1-Continued. Fishermen, American, not released from British control by treaty of 1783, 1381. Fisheries conceded to Americans in 1782, reasons for, 1379-80. Fisheries discovered by Americans, Adams to Thomas, Aug. 10, 1822, U. S. Fishery rights insisted on by American commissioners, Fitzherbert to Shel- Fitzherbert to Shelburne, Dec. 4, 1782, B. C. C. Ap., 110, American commissioners insist on fishery rights, 1378-9. FITZPATRICK: Canadian regulations, 1407. Regulation must be authorized by legislation, 1389. Security for fair administration of regulations, 1423. Treaty right subject to preexisting laws, 1418. United States position re partition theory, 1434. Forsyth to Stevenson, Feb. 20, 1841, B. C. Ap., 124, treaty right subject to local legislation, 1406, exclusion law, LAMMASch, 1407. Franco-American controversy, 1404-5. Free fishing did not mean unlimited fishing, 1371. Imperial statute, 1699, Free fishing, 1783 treaty, means freedom previously enjoyed by colonists, 1372. Free fishing to American citizens does not prohibit State regulation: Dunham v. Lamphere, 3 Gray, 268, 1391-4. Mass. v. Manchester, 152 Mass. R., 230; 139 U. S., 240, 1394-5. Frelinghuysen, West to, Oct. 9, 1883, U. S. C. Ap., 751, joint regulations, 1425. Frelinghuysen to West, July 11, 1884, U. S. C. Ap., 753, joint regulations, 1426. French rights: Claimed to be exclusive, 1404; but are not, 1381-2. French shore, regulations unnecessary on, 1404. Gallatin and Rush, Adams to, July 28, 1818, B. C. Ap., 85, partition theory, Gardner's letter, B. C. Ap., 502, regulations unreasonable, position of United Geographical advantages of British fishermen, 1422. Governors, Livingstone to the, Feb. 19, 1782, B. C. C. Ap., 30, hazardous Grant of liberty to United States did not prevent similar grant to others, 1381. GRAY: American claim, any regulation is derogation of treaty right, 1386–8. Great Britain, statutes of. See Statutes cited, Imperial. Great Britain's failure to regulate does not indicate inability, 1401. Green, Livingstone to, Jan. 31, 1782, B. C. C. Ap., 30, hazardous position of Grey's memorandum, B. C. Ap., 495, partition theory, 1436-7. Ewart, John S., K. C.-Continued. Question 1-Continued. Halifax commission: 3-mile limit follows sinuosities of coast, Proceedings I: 169,1414-15. Trescott at: American right unlimited, B. C. Ap., 266, 1368-9; rights within 3-mile limit not invasion of territorial jurisdiction, B. C. C. Ap., 187, 1411. Hamilton, Bathurst to, June 21, 1819, B. C. Ap., 99, regulations on Labrador coast, 1401. Harbors, regulations, imperial statute, 1824, B. C. Ap., 567, GRAY, 1401-2. Hoppin, Salibury to, Apr. 3, 1880, B. C. Ap., 278, American fishermen to be regulated, GRAY, 1416-18. Imperial or local regulations, existence of, 1404. Imperial statute, 1699, free fishing not unlimited, 1371-2. "In common": Defined, 1397. Means "on terms of equality," GRAY, 1413–14. United States v. Alaska Packers Association, 79 Fed. Rep., 152, 1397–8. Inhabitants of certain locality, treaty right limited to, 1427. In-shore fishery, congressional committee report, 1782, disclaimed right to, International and interstate relations, distinction, LAMMASCH, 1394–5. Interstate and international relations, distinction, Lammasch, 1394–5. Labrador coast, regulations on, Bathurst to Hamilton, June 21, 1819, B. C. Labrador, regulations in, LAMMASCH, 1407. LAMMASCH: British may make regulations not destructive of treaty right, 1389. Difference between interstate and international relations, 1394–5. Exclusion law, Forsyth to Stevenson, Feb. 20, 1841, B. C. Ap., 124, 1407. Regulations in Labrador, 1407. Right to regulate subject to remonstrance, 1419. Special Agreement, 1909, article 4, provision for agreement to regulations, 1389-90. Imperial statute, 1775, B. C. Ap., 545, Sunday fishing, 1403. United States position re partition theory, 1429. Lamphere, Dunham v., 3 Gray, 268, free fishing to American citizens does not prohibit State regulation, 1391-4. Laws regulating fisheries under colonial charters, B. C. Ap., 770–776, 1370–71. Legislation, treaty cannot be modified by, Welsh to Salisbury, Nov. 7, 1878, Legislation, treaty right subject to local: Forsyth to Stevenson, Feb. 20, 1841, Ewart, John S., K. C.-Continued. Question 1-Continued. Liberties, colonial, in fishery: 1369–71. 1620, Virginia charter, right of King Dunham v. Lamphere, 3 Gray, 268, free fishing to American citizens does not prohibit State regulation, 1391-4. Ownership and regulation of fisheries rested in States after 1783, 1391. License, liberty to fish is not, 1371, 1381. Livingstone to the governors, Feb. 19, 1782, B. C. C. Ap., 30, hazardous Livingstone to Green, Jan. 31, 1782, B. C. C. Ap., 30, hazardous position of Livingstone to Washington, Mar. 12, 1783, B. C. C. Ap., 132, right to fishery Local or Imperial regulations, existence of, 1404. Lowell, Granville to, Oct. 27, 1880, B. C. Ap., 290, joint regulations, 1425. Madison to Randolph, Mar. 12, 1783, B. C. C. Ap., 132, fishery rights same as Maine, statute 1883, B. C. C. Ap., 196, regulation under 1871 treaty, 1420. Manchester, Mass., v., 152 Mass. R. 230, 139 U. S., 240, free fishing to American Massachusetts charter, 1691, right of free fishery reserved to British subjects, Mass. v. Manchester, 152 Mass. R. 230, 139 U. S., 240, free fishing to American Monroe, Adams to, Sept. 19, 1815, B. C. Ap., 65, partition theory, 1432. Negotiations, 1782: 1376–79. Adams' diary, Nov. 29, 1782, B. C. C. Ap., 103, New Brunswick, statutes of. See Statutes cited. |