 ... the personal representatives of the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action had he lived against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission. The action must be commenced within...  Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of ... - Seite 598von Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1861Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1897 - 824 Seiten
...477. The statutes of Kansas and Indiana are substantially the same. Each provides that the damages must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or the next of kin, to be distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased. 2. Rut... | |
 | District of Columbia - 1857 - 788 Seiten
...personal representatives. Such action must be commenced within two years, and the damages recovered shall inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, of the deceased, to be distributed in the same manner as his personal property. CHAPTER 121. OF THE... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1880 - 730 Seiten
...statute, the damages recovered of a railroad company for causing the death of a person through negligence must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, and next of kin, to be distributed, etc. PitlsOpinion of the Court. burg, Fort Wayne and Chicago Railway... | |
 | 1892 - 554 Seiten
...representatives of the former may maintain an action therefor." " The damages cannot exceed $10,000, and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or next of kin, lo be distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased." Held, that the wife could... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1901 - 704 Seiten
...same act or omission. This action must be commenced within two years. The damages cannot exceed ten thousand dollars and must inure to the exclusive benefit...distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased." The title of the Indiana act of March 4, 1893, known as the Employers' Liability Art, is... | |
 | 1875 - 870 Seiten
...exception of the statutes of California, and perhaps Iowa, which we shall hereafter notice, the phraseology maintain an action therefor, against the latter, if...exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or the next of kin, to be distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased." (2 Ind.... | |
 | Milo Adams McClelland - 1877 - 588 Seiten
...must be commenced within two years. The damages cannot exceed five thousand dollars, and must enure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children,...distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased.' 2 RS p. 205. Personal property, it may be remarked, of the deceased, in certain contingencies... | |
 | David Rorer - 1879 - 468 Seiten
...against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action had he lived, against the latter for the same act or omission. The action must be commenced...distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased. Under this statute, the Supreme Court of Indiana hold, that an action lies for a wrongful... | |
 | David Rorer - 1879 - 470 Seiten
...against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action had he lived, against the latter for the same act or omission. The action must be commenced...the widow and children, if any, or next of kin, to Le distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased. Under this statute, the Supreme... | |
 | 1894 - 2096 Seiten
...personal estate. But this statute expressly prohibits that disposition. It declares that the damages ''must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any." To hold that these damages could be diverted to the benefit of any one else would be to lly in the... | |
| |
